Of course, I agree with you, esp since I just put forth the idea you support earlier in the thread.
RugbyPlayingAshaman Send a noteboard - 11/01/2010 04:58:26 PM
"Here's another possibility I hadn't mentioned previously. Maybe even damage below the irreparable state causes severe trouble, like the time/space chaos we've observed in the later books. Things like rooms changing places or the Village in Shiota or Hinderstap."
I said something similar to this ine one of my replies. My argument went like this: There was a lot of damage to the Pattern done during the War of Power, this damage was lessened when balefire stopped being used en masse but it was not halted because the Dark One continued to touch the world. In the current Age, the Pattern may not have fully recovered from this past damage, especially given that the world is still reeling from the W.O.P. and The Breaking, so using balefire in such a way at all may be enough to cause a serious rupture in the Pattern.
I think the best way to envision the Age Lace would be to think of the Narrative Chart AesJedai posted in a separate thread (link is attached). Though the flow of the chart does not show specific character actions, you can chart each character's whereabouts during climactic parts of the War of the Ring. Given a sufficient familiarity with the Book, you can say that removing certain threads causes the entire tapestry of lines to fall apart, because during particular moments, the lives and wellbeings of others depended on the actions of that particular thread. Using WoT terminology, for example, if you balefired Arwen, who in the grand scheme of things had a relatively small part to play in the movie, from time/space before she rescued Frodo, Frodo would be dead, and the entire tapestry would fall into a new form after many fluctuations - the yellow-bordered green line may or may not survive the poisoned wound, or it may not make it to the Ring's Destruction. Given that we don't know the relative importance of each and every thread in the Pattern, nor what these threads were supposed to do in the future, you could cause a major rupture in the Pattern by the removal of many such "one note" players.
I said something similar to this ine one of my replies. My argument went like this: There was a lot of damage to the Pattern done during the War of Power, this damage was lessened when balefire stopped being used en masse but it was not halted because the Dark One continued to touch the world. In the current Age, the Pattern may not have fully recovered from this past damage, especially given that the world is still reeling from the W.O.P. and The Breaking, so using balefire in such a way at all may be enough to cause a serious rupture in the Pattern.
I think the best way to envision the Age Lace would be to think of the Narrative Chart AesJedai posted in a separate thread (link is attached). Though the flow of the chart does not show specific character actions, you can chart each character's whereabouts during climactic parts of the War of the Ring. Given a sufficient familiarity with the Book, you can say that removing certain threads causes the entire tapestry of lines to fall apart, because during particular moments, the lives and wellbeings of others depended on the actions of that particular thread. Using WoT terminology, for example, if you balefired Arwen, who in the grand scheme of things had a relatively small part to play in the movie, from time/space before she rescued Frodo, Frodo would be dead, and the entire tapestry would fall into a new form after many fluctuations - the yellow-bordered green line may or may not survive the poisoned wound, or it may not make it to the Ring's Destruction. Given that we don't know the relative importance of each and every thread in the Pattern, nor what these threads were supposed to do in the future, you could cause a major rupture in the Pattern by the removal of many such "one note" players.
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
Rand the psycho?
06/01/2010 02:53:30 AM
- 1663 Views
I cannot follow your assumptions.
06/01/2010 04:07:33 AM
- 1067 Views
Re: I cannot follow your assumptions.
06/01/2010 04:59:12 AM
- 898 Views
Wait!
06/01/2010 05:10:33 AM
- 1022 Views
Re: Wait!
06/01/2010 05:20:02 AM
- 929 Views
Re: Wait!
06/01/2010 05:58:00 AM
- 898 Views
Re: Wait!
06/01/2010 11:46:13 AM
- 849 Views
I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
06/01/2010 07:30:56 AM
- 974 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
06/01/2010 03:32:24 PM
- 879 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
06/01/2010 09:52:47 PM
- 950 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
06/01/2010 11:19:56 PM
- 857 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
07/01/2010 12:21:50 AM
- 925 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
07/01/2010 12:56:26 AM
- 858 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
07/01/2010 01:46:16 AM
- 916 Views
Of course, I agree with you, esp since I just put forth the idea you support earlier in the thread.
11/01/2010 04:58:26 PM
- 1333 Views
Rand crossed a line
06/01/2010 02:36:42 PM
- 964 Views
Doesn't Balefire remove your thread from the Pattern permanently?
06/01/2010 02:55:38 PM
- 944 Views
No, RJ stated balefired people can be reborn. *NM*
06/01/2010 03:26:00 PM
- 454 Views
But not in this turning of the Wheel. So they'd miss out on MANY lifetimes.
06/01/2010 05:46:04 PM
- 874 Views
No, balefire just kills you backwards in time. It is not super-death. *NM*
06/01/2010 09:58:18 PM
- 482 Views
LOL ... super-death!
06/01/2010 11:59:31 PM
- 822 Views
Yes it was.
06/01/2010 06:51:15 PM
- 934 Views
Re: Yes it was.
06/01/2010 07:16:14 PM
- 853 Views
Re: Yes it was.
06/01/2010 08:58:40 PM
- 897 Views
Re: Yes it was.
06/01/2010 10:47:11 PM
- 891 Views
let me ask the question in a different way
06/01/2010 11:26:43 PM
- 896 Views
Re: let me ask the question in a different way
06/01/2010 11:40:56 PM
- 888 Views
actually that quote supports my thoughts
06/01/2010 11:50:40 PM
- 912 Views
Re: actually that quote supports my thoughts
07/01/2010 12:10:07 AM
- 841 Views
yet it could take him some undetermined amount of time to figure out your dead?
07/01/2010 12:34:34 AM
- 829 Views
Re: yet it could take him some undetermined amount of time to figure out your dead?
07/01/2010 01:13:40 AM
- 803 Views
Meh. I just think advocating mass-murder is the opposite direction RJ meant for this to take.
07/01/2010 12:00:44 AM
- 937 Views
Sigh. What mass murder?
07/01/2010 12:15:01 AM
- 788 Views
In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 03:14:32 PM
- 863 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 03:57:43 PM
- 872 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 07:13:21 PM
- 887 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 07:52:24 PM
- 832 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 08:56:43 PM
- 898 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 09:26:01 PM
- 848 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 09:30:45 PM
- 784 Views
Personally I'm kind of sick of Rand being the only person killing FS!
07/01/2010 09:42:57 PM
- 955 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 09:56:02 PM
- 891 Views
OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol:
07/01/2010 10:30:19 PM
- 876 Views
Yes. Anakin Skywalker all over again
06/01/2010 11:01:02 PM
- 970 Views
Meh
06/01/2010 11:30:24 PM
- 808 Views
The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
06/01/2010 11:33:32 PM
- 815 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
06/01/2010 11:50:37 PM
- 897 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
06/01/2010 11:55:03 PM
- 857 Views
I do have to guiltily say, though, that if Rand had balefired the Seanchan and THEN became good...
07/01/2010 12:03:20 AM
- 864 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
07/01/2010 12:23:11 AM
- 803 Views
I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
07/01/2010 12:52:25 AM
- 814 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
07/01/2010 01:24:32 AM
- 880 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
07/01/2010 03:33:52 PM
- 828 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
07/01/2010 04:28:18 PM
- 968 Views
right cause all Generals are so well versed in medical conditions
07/01/2010 09:44:09 PM
- 918 Views

Nice way to avoid the argument.
07/01/2010 10:00:17 PM
- 865 Views
I'm just done talking in circles. You seem to think that because people
07/01/2010 11:53:05 PM
- 906 Views
I concede
07/01/2010 01:09:11 AM
- 807 Views
You weren't wrong overall, but there were some serious flaws in your reasoning.
07/01/2010 02:43:17 AM
- 914 Views
Morals are subjective anyhow,
07/01/2010 06:23:09 AM
- 894 Views
Re: Morals are subjective anyhow,
07/01/2010 03:23:59 PM
- 818 Views
I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention
09/01/2010 12:00:02 AM
- 896 Views
You are treating Graendal's "pets" as though they were enemy combatants
07/01/2010 03:40:03 PM
- 949 Views
Like I give a damn what a group of professional killers would do.
08/01/2010 11:39:11 PM
- 812 Views
Graendal captured these people as part of the Shadows offensive, Operation Chaos Rules
09/01/2010 12:00:40 AM
- 1121 Views
Well, I still liked your first argument. It's a freaking war. The argument ...
07/01/2010 07:08:53 PM
- 849 Views