Active Users:860 Time:06/08/2025 10:03:30 AM
Re: Crap RugbyPlayingAshaman Send a noteboard - 05/03/2010 08:46:56 PM
I am a lowly grunt-turned-electrical engineer and I like to think I would score better on an IQ test than the more than average theologian. Is some of that conceit? Maybe. But, I think your typical theologian is a charlatan.


And I would agree with you.

I've been in too many discussions or debates with philosophers that hinge on their manipulation of logic and sophistry to be convinced that their intelligence is that impressive.
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
Reply to message
Ishamael's nature - 01/03/2010 05:27:48 PM 1797 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 01/03/2010 07:15:54 PM 820 Views
Sisyphus *NM* - 02/03/2010 02:27:06 AM 281 Views
Not a question of intelligence. Rather, a different way of thinking... - 01/03/2010 07:23:37 PM 837 Views
I agree, except with your statement on what Ishamael's area of expertise is ... - 02/03/2010 03:17:13 PM 664 Views
Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil - 02/03/2010 04:38:06 PM 692 Views
Are you saying that philosophers are inherently more intelligent than other academics? - 02/03/2010 04:53:13 PM 589 Views
Maybe - 02/03/2010 06:00:20 PM 655 Views
Crap - 02/03/2010 08:58:12 PM 642 Views
I think the averages are averages. - 03/03/2010 01:14:41 AM 570 Views
Re: Crap - 05/03/2010 08:46:56 PM 543 Views
Re: Crap - 07/03/2010 11:36:16 PM 513 Views
I love IQ tests. - 08/03/2010 01:18:10 AM 509 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil - 02/03/2010 05:30:43 PM 609 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil - 07/03/2010 11:31:14 PM 550 Views
I'm not an expert on nihilism, but ... - 08/03/2010 05:22:33 PM 702 Views
I doubt that. - 08/03/2010 01:21:32 AM 524 Views
Re: I doubt that. - 08/03/2010 12:41:43 PM 511 Views
Yep, I agree. - 08/03/2010 05:58:03 PM 610 Views
This ties in with his parallel to Lucifer. - 03/03/2010 12:57:37 AM 592 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 01:49:19 AM 642 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 02:51:44 PM 588 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 07:31:32 PM 564 Views
Both of us are saying the same thing - 03/03/2010 01:46:57 PM 531 Views
sorry, took "evil" too literally and - 03/03/2010 07:02:01 PM 510 Views
Found a great theory about Ishamael and his logic on theoryland - 02/03/2010 02:48:02 PM 984 Views
Nice - 02/03/2010 04:41:05 PM 577 Views
Impressive - 02/03/2010 07:24:09 PM 572 Views
I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least... - 08/03/2010 01:47:47 AM 569 Views
Re: I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least... - 08/03/2010 12:37:27 PM 519 Views
Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern. - 08/03/2010 06:23:19 PM 552 Views
Re: Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern. - 09/03/2010 01:54:26 PM 544 Views
Because there is a Creator. - 09/03/2010 05:57:16 PM 498 Views
faulty assumptions - 10/03/2010 05:05:23 AM 500 Views
Impossible. - 10/03/2010 06:22:43 AM 497 Views
maybe an analogy will help - 10/03/2010 12:55:37 PM 913 Views
But therein lies the problem. - 10/03/2010 04:58:42 PM 490 Views
your own argument is self defeating - 11/03/2010 08:10:36 AM 521 Views
Anyway I just realized this point is irrelevant to the original theory - 11/03/2010 08:14:20 AM 497 Views
Yes, I said that at the very beginning: *NM* - 11/03/2010 05:44:19 PM 231 Views
Your reasons and mine for irrelevancy are different.. *NM* - 12/03/2010 05:12:52 AM 221 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 10:43:16 PM 581 Views
I don't know if this has any basis in fact... - 04/03/2010 02:44:26 AM 661 Views

Reply to Message