Active Users:646 Time:16/02/2026 06:31:22 PM
Re: Crap RugbyPlayingAshaman Send a noteboard - 05/03/2010 08:46:56 PM
I am a lowly grunt-turned-electrical engineer and I like to think I would score better on an IQ test than the more than average theologian. Is some of that conceit? Maybe. But, I think your typical theologian is a charlatan.


And I would agree with you.

I've been in too many discussions or debates with philosophers that hinge on their manipulation of logic and sophistry to be convinced that their intelligence is that impressive.
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
Reply to message
Ishamael's nature - 01/03/2010 05:27:48 PM 1875 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 01/03/2010 07:15:54 PM 888 Views
Sisyphus *NM* - 02/03/2010 02:27:06 AM 313 Views
Not a question of intelligence. Rather, a different way of thinking... - 01/03/2010 07:23:37 PM 918 Views
I agree, except with your statement on what Ishamael's area of expertise is ... - 02/03/2010 03:17:13 PM 729 Views
Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil - 02/03/2010 04:38:06 PM 767 Views
Are you saying that philosophers are inherently more intelligent than other academics? - 02/03/2010 04:53:13 PM 659 Views
Maybe - 02/03/2010 06:00:20 PM 728 Views
Crap - 02/03/2010 08:58:12 PM 703 Views
I think the averages are averages. - 03/03/2010 01:14:41 AM 638 Views
Re: Crap - 05/03/2010 08:46:56 PM 613 Views
Re: Crap - 07/03/2010 11:36:16 PM 600 Views
I love IQ tests. - 08/03/2010 01:18:10 AM 574 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil - 02/03/2010 05:30:43 PM 697 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil - 07/03/2010 11:31:14 PM 624 Views
I'm not an expert on nihilism, but ... - 08/03/2010 05:22:33 PM 777 Views
I doubt that. - 08/03/2010 01:21:32 AM 595 Views
Re: I doubt that. - 08/03/2010 12:41:43 PM 579 Views
Yep, I agree. - 08/03/2010 05:58:03 PM 685 Views
This ties in with his parallel to Lucifer. - 03/03/2010 12:57:37 AM 666 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 01:49:19 AM 706 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 02:51:44 PM 674 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 07:31:32 PM 630 Views
Both of us are saying the same thing - 03/03/2010 01:46:57 PM 606 Views
sorry, took "evil" too literally and - 03/03/2010 07:02:01 PM 576 Views
Found a great theory about Ishamael and his logic on theoryland - 02/03/2010 02:48:02 PM 1093 Views
Nice - 02/03/2010 04:41:05 PM 643 Views
Impressive - 02/03/2010 07:24:09 PM 637 Views
I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least... - 08/03/2010 01:47:47 AM 641 Views
Re: I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least... - 08/03/2010 12:37:27 PM 594 Views
Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern. - 08/03/2010 06:23:19 PM 634 Views
Re: Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern. - 09/03/2010 01:54:26 PM 629 Views
Because there is a Creator. - 09/03/2010 05:57:16 PM 572 Views
faulty assumptions - 10/03/2010 05:05:23 AM 577 Views
Impossible. - 10/03/2010 06:22:43 AM 583 Views
maybe an analogy will help - 10/03/2010 12:55:37 PM 984 Views
But therein lies the problem. - 10/03/2010 04:58:42 PM 557 Views
your own argument is self defeating - 11/03/2010 08:10:36 AM 592 Views
Anyway I just realized this point is irrelevant to the original theory - 11/03/2010 08:14:20 AM 561 Views
Yes, I said that at the very beginning: *NM* - 11/03/2010 05:44:19 PM 266 Views
Your reasons and mine for irrelevancy are different.. *NM* - 12/03/2010 05:12:52 AM 253 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 10:43:16 PM 654 Views
I don't know if this has any basis in fact... - 04/03/2010 02:44:26 AM 782 Views

Reply to Message