Active Users:644 Time:16/02/2026 06:31:10 PM
Re: Crap mogi67 Send a noteboard - 07/03/2010 11:36:16 PM
If so, I disagree with you. If you have them all write IQ tests I'm pretty sure that the quantum physicists, theoretical mathematicians etc will trump the philosophers and theologians.


I am a lowly grunt-turned-electrical engineer and I like to think I would score better on an IQ test than the more than average theologian. Is some of that conceit? Maybe. But, I think your typical theologian is a charlatan.


How many theologians do you really know?
Reply to message
Ishamael's nature - 01/03/2010 05:27:48 PM 1875 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 01/03/2010 07:15:54 PM 888 Views
Sisyphus *NM* - 02/03/2010 02:27:06 AM 312 Views
Not a question of intelligence. Rather, a different way of thinking... - 01/03/2010 07:23:37 PM 918 Views
I agree, except with your statement on what Ishamael's area of expertise is ... - 02/03/2010 03:17:13 PM 728 Views
Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil - 02/03/2010 04:38:06 PM 767 Views
Are you saying that philosophers are inherently more intelligent than other academics? - 02/03/2010 04:53:13 PM 659 Views
Maybe - 02/03/2010 06:00:20 PM 728 Views
Crap - 02/03/2010 08:58:12 PM 703 Views
I think the averages are averages. - 03/03/2010 01:14:41 AM 638 Views
Re: Crap - 05/03/2010 08:46:56 PM 612 Views
Re: Crap - 07/03/2010 11:36:16 PM 600 Views
I love IQ tests. - 08/03/2010 01:18:10 AM 574 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil - 02/03/2010 05:30:43 PM 697 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil - 07/03/2010 11:31:14 PM 623 Views
I'm not an expert on nihilism, but ... - 08/03/2010 05:22:33 PM 777 Views
I doubt that. - 08/03/2010 01:21:32 AM 595 Views
Re: I doubt that. - 08/03/2010 12:41:43 PM 579 Views
Yep, I agree. - 08/03/2010 05:58:03 PM 684 Views
This ties in with his parallel to Lucifer. - 03/03/2010 12:57:37 AM 666 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 01:49:19 AM 706 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 02:51:44 PM 673 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 07:31:32 PM 630 Views
Both of us are saying the same thing - 03/03/2010 01:46:57 PM 606 Views
sorry, took "evil" too literally and - 03/03/2010 07:02:01 PM 575 Views
Found a great theory about Ishamael and his logic on theoryland - 02/03/2010 02:48:02 PM 1092 Views
Nice - 02/03/2010 04:41:05 PM 643 Views
Impressive - 02/03/2010 07:24:09 PM 637 Views
I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least... - 08/03/2010 01:47:47 AM 641 Views
Re: I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least... - 08/03/2010 12:37:27 PM 593 Views
Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern. - 08/03/2010 06:23:19 PM 634 Views
Re: Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern. - 09/03/2010 01:54:26 PM 629 Views
Because there is a Creator. - 09/03/2010 05:57:16 PM 572 Views
faulty assumptions - 10/03/2010 05:05:23 AM 577 Views
Impossible. - 10/03/2010 06:22:43 AM 583 Views
maybe an analogy will help - 10/03/2010 12:55:37 PM 984 Views
But therein lies the problem. - 10/03/2010 04:58:42 PM 557 Views
your own argument is self defeating - 11/03/2010 08:10:36 AM 591 Views
Anyway I just realized this point is irrelevant to the original theory - 11/03/2010 08:14:20 AM 560 Views
Yes, I said that at the very beginning: *NM* - 11/03/2010 05:44:19 PM 266 Views
Your reasons and mine for irrelevancy are different.. *NM* - 12/03/2010 05:12:52 AM 253 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 10:43:16 PM 654 Views
I don't know if this has any basis in fact... - 04/03/2010 02:44:26 AM 782 Views

Reply to Message