Active Users:1115 Time:16/12/2025 12:57:55 AM
I doubt that. Fanatic-Templar Send a noteboard - 08/03/2010 01:21:32 AM
I understand what you're saying (I think), but I would word it differently.

Ishamael's beliefs are, by our definition, evil.

Therefore, Ishamael is, by our definition, evil.

But, Ishamael doesn't believe he is evil, nor does he believe the DO is evil, nor does he believe in evil. He simply believes what he believes, and doesn't care about any arbitrary label of that belief as Good or Evil.


I'm fairly certain that Ishamael knows what he's doing is evil. He simply believes that the ends justify the means.
The first rule of being a ninja is "do no harm". Unless you intend to do harm, then do lots of harm.
~Master Splinter

Victorious in Bergioyn's legendary 'Reverse Mafia'. *MySmiley*
Reply to message
Ishamael's nature - 01/03/2010 05:27:48 PM 1847 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 01/03/2010 07:15:54 PM 864 Views
Sisyphus *NM* - 02/03/2010 02:27:06 AM 303 Views
Not a question of intelligence. Rather, a different way of thinking... - 01/03/2010 07:23:37 PM 890 Views
I agree, except with your statement on what Ishamael's area of expertise is ... - 02/03/2010 03:17:13 PM 706 Views
Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil - 02/03/2010 04:38:06 PM 742 Views
Are you saying that philosophers are inherently more intelligent than other academics? - 02/03/2010 04:53:13 PM 636 Views
Maybe - 02/03/2010 06:00:20 PM 702 Views
Crap - 02/03/2010 08:58:12 PM 683 Views
I think the averages are averages. - 03/03/2010 01:14:41 AM 617 Views
Re: Crap - 05/03/2010 08:46:56 PM 583 Views
Re: Crap - 07/03/2010 11:36:16 PM 569 Views
I love IQ tests. - 08/03/2010 01:18:10 AM 553 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil - 02/03/2010 05:30:43 PM 664 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil - 07/03/2010 11:31:14 PM 602 Views
I'm not an expert on nihilism, but ... - 08/03/2010 05:22:33 PM 748 Views
I doubt that. - 08/03/2010 01:21:32 AM 570 Views
Re: I doubt that. - 08/03/2010 12:41:43 PM 555 Views
Yep, I agree. - 08/03/2010 05:58:03 PM 661 Views
This ties in with his parallel to Lucifer. - 03/03/2010 12:57:37 AM 642 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 01:49:19 AM 680 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 02:51:44 PM 642 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 07:31:32 PM 609 Views
Both of us are saying the same thing - 03/03/2010 01:46:57 PM 578 Views
sorry, took "evil" too literally and - 03/03/2010 07:02:01 PM 551 Views
Found a great theory about Ishamael and his logic on theoryland - 02/03/2010 02:48:02 PM 1062 Views
Nice - 02/03/2010 04:41:05 PM 619 Views
Impressive - 02/03/2010 07:24:09 PM 613 Views
I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least... - 08/03/2010 01:47:47 AM 616 Views
Re: I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least... - 08/03/2010 12:37:27 PM 569 Views
Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern. - 08/03/2010 06:23:19 PM 599 Views
Re: Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern. - 09/03/2010 01:54:26 PM 605 Views
Because there is a Creator. - 09/03/2010 05:57:16 PM 542 Views
faulty assumptions - 10/03/2010 05:05:23 AM 553 Views
Impossible. - 10/03/2010 06:22:43 AM 555 Views
maybe an analogy will help - 10/03/2010 12:55:37 PM 959 Views
But therein lies the problem. - 10/03/2010 04:58:42 PM 537 Views
your own argument is self defeating - 11/03/2010 08:10:36 AM 570 Views
Anyway I just realized this point is irrelevant to the original theory - 11/03/2010 08:14:20 AM 536 Views
Yes, I said that at the very beginning: *NM* - 11/03/2010 05:44:19 PM 256 Views
Your reasons and mine for irrelevancy are different.. *NM* - 12/03/2010 05:12:52 AM 243 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 10:43:16 PM 626 Views
I don't know if this has any basis in fact... - 04/03/2010 02:44:26 AM 732 Views

Reply to Message