Active Users:1264 Time:01/08/2026 02:29:14 PM
I doubt that. Fanatic-Templar Send a noteboard - 08/03/2010 01:21:32 AM
I understand what you're saying (I think), but I would word it differently.

Ishamael's beliefs are, by our definition, evil.

Therefore, Ishamael is, by our definition, evil.

But, Ishamael doesn't believe he is evil, nor does he believe the DO is evil, nor does he believe in evil. He simply believes what he believes, and doesn't care about any arbitrary label of that belief as Good or Evil.


I'm fairly certain that Ishamael knows what he's doing is evil. He simply believes that the ends justify the means.
The first rule of being a ninja is "do no harm". Unless you intend to do harm, then do lots of harm.
~Master Splinter

Victorious in Bergioyn's legendary 'Reverse Mafia'. *MySmiley*
Reply to message
Ishamael's nature - 01/03/2010 05:27:48 PM 1970 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 01/03/2010 07:15:54 PM 991 Views
Sisyphus *NM* - 02/03/2010 02:27:06 AM 360 Views
Not a question of intelligence. Rather, a different way of thinking... - 01/03/2010 07:23:37 PM 1009 Views
I agree, except with your statement on what Ishamael's area of expertise is ... - 02/03/2010 03:17:13 PM 819 Views
Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil - 02/03/2010 04:38:06 PM 857 Views
Are you saying that philosophers are inherently more intelligent than other academics? - 02/03/2010 04:53:13 PM 741 Views
Maybe - 02/03/2010 06:00:20 PM 827 Views
Crap - 02/03/2010 08:58:12 PM 782 Views
I think the averages are averages. - 03/03/2010 01:14:41 AM 727 Views
Re: Crap - 05/03/2010 08:46:56 PM 732 Views
Re: Crap - 07/03/2010 11:36:16 PM 685 Views
I love IQ tests. - 08/03/2010 01:18:10 AM 660 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil - 02/03/2010 05:30:43 PM 794 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil - 07/03/2010 11:31:14 PM 720 Views
I'm not an expert on nihilism, but ... - 08/03/2010 05:22:33 PM 856 Views
I doubt that. - 08/03/2010 01:21:32 AM 684 Views
Re: I doubt that. - 08/03/2010 12:41:43 PM 663 Views
Yep, I agree. - 08/03/2010 05:58:03 PM 771 Views
This ties in with his parallel to Lucifer. - 03/03/2010 12:57:37 AM 769 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 01:49:19 AM 805 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 02:51:44 PM 763 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 07:31:32 PM 721 Views
Both of us are saying the same thing - 03/03/2010 01:46:57 PM 705 Views
sorry, took "evil" too literally and - 03/03/2010 07:02:01 PM 671 Views
Found a great theory about Ishamael and his logic on theoryland - 02/03/2010 02:48:02 PM 1222 Views
Nice - 02/03/2010 04:41:05 PM 738 Views
Impressive - 02/03/2010 07:24:09 PM 720 Views
I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least... - 08/03/2010 01:47:47 AM 733 Views
Re: I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least... - 08/03/2010 12:37:27 PM 677 Views
Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern. - 08/03/2010 06:23:19 PM 746 Views
Re: Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern. - 09/03/2010 01:54:26 PM 722 Views
Because there is a Creator. - 09/03/2010 05:57:16 PM 659 Views
faulty assumptions - 10/03/2010 05:05:23 AM 662 Views
Impossible. - 10/03/2010 06:22:43 AM 671 Views
maybe an analogy will help - 10/03/2010 12:55:37 PM 1069 Views
But therein lies the problem. - 10/03/2010 04:58:42 PM 643 Views
your own argument is self defeating - 11/03/2010 08:10:36 AM 689 Views
Anyway I just realized this point is irrelevant to the original theory - 11/03/2010 08:14:20 AM 666 Views
Yes, I said that at the very beginning: *NM* - 11/03/2010 05:44:19 PM 312 Views
Your reasons and mine for irrelevancy are different.. *NM* - 12/03/2010 05:12:52 AM 299 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 10:43:16 PM 761 Views
I don't know if this has any basis in fact... - 04/03/2010 02:44:26 AM 890 Views

Reply to Message