Active Users:1898 Time:29/07/2026 08:02:51 PM
Maybe Xeroxes of abridged texts and dumbed down theology Larry Send a noteboard - 06/10/2011 02:26:58 AM
The Catholic Church was most obviously corrupt and venal when Luther nailed his theses to the church door in Wittenberg. The problem is that, by introducing at once Bibles in the vernacular and the sola scriptura method of theology, each splinter group was a poor copy of what preceded it, to the point where one sees heresies particular to America, such as Jehovah's Witnesses and Mormons, who aren't even Christians because their copy is so garbled and unusable.


True. The further one gets from the actual schism, the worse it gets. It's hard for me to think of a non-ecclesiastical church as being anything more than an echo chamber where the most ignorant can (and do) view themselves as being as knowledgeable as the presumed leaders.

Christians can try to instruct them as to the error of their ways and the crudeness of their scriptures, but at the end of the day all anyone can do with an unrepentant Mormon is feel sorry for them, sigh, shake your head and just ignore their faith.


Quite true. For me, if there is an organization whose history does not date at the latest to the 6th century, that group's theology (or poor excuse for it) will not interest me. Monophysites and Monohelites are much, much more interesting than Campbellites or Mormons.
Illusions fall like the husk of a fruit, one after another, and the fruit is experience. - Narrator, Sylvie

Je suis méchant.
Reply to message
Mormons - 03/10/2011 05:46:10 AM 2733 Views
Questions. - 03/10/2011 11:13:25 AM 1460 Views
Ooh! Ooh! - 03/10/2011 11:18:38 AM 1310 Views
I don't watch it. - 04/10/2011 01:34:53 AM 1360 Views
Re: Questions. - 03/10/2011 01:28:28 PM 1430 Views
Re: Questions. - 03/10/2011 01:31:13 PM 1271 Views
Why did I look up what Quorn is? I didn't need to know that. *NM* - 03/10/2011 02:04:20 PM 785 Views
Wyld Stallyns!! - 03/10/2011 03:26:54 PM 1210 Views
STATION! *NM* - 03/10/2011 11:00:35 PM 709 Views
Re: One of the best replies, ever, on the internet. *NM* - 06/10/2011 02:43:07 AM 755 Views
....did we just get door-to-door'd...ONLINE?!?! *NM* - 03/10/2011 11:34:19 AM 733 Views
Nope. - 04/10/2011 01:32:43 AM 1293 Views
there's no real point to it - 04/10/2011 02:37:24 AM 2318 Views
We could use an evil cackling smilie, we do have some other evil ones - 04/10/2011 02:49:12 AM 1266 Views
wasn't going to argue... *NM* - 04/10/2011 02:57:00 AM 724 Views
Do you ever giggle at the name "Moroni?" - 03/10/2011 11:39:55 AM 1382 Views
There are Mormon literalists? Seriously? *NM* - 03/10/2011 03:02:18 PM 725 Views
I know they don't have multiple wives anymore, so no misconception there - 03/10/2011 01:23:50 PM 1291 Views
There are Fundamentalist "Mormons" who do... - 03/10/2011 11:32:56 PM 1190 Views
Don't get me wrong by the way, I've met wonderful Mormons - 04/10/2011 12:22:03 PM 1267 Views
Question: Why are you such a faggot? *NM* - 03/10/2011 02:23:45 PM 628 Views
Answer: because it's the only way he could return your burning love for him. - 03/10/2011 03:24:23 PM 853 Views
Oh dont be such a fuddy duddy. - 03/10/2011 10:42:06 PM 850 Views
Better a faggot than a fuckwad. Cheers fuckwad! *NM* - 04/10/2011 01:27:20 AM 743 Views
Well, I suppose you'ld be the one to know. *NM* - 04/10/2011 01:54:35 AM 686 Views
Really? You really just pulled a "takes one to know one"? *NM* - 04/10/2011 04:19:22 PM 803 Views
Re: You embarrass yourself. *NM* - 04/10/2011 01:56:02 AM 636 Views
I'll tell you whats embarresing... - 04/10/2011 02:08:02 AM 960 Views
That is hilarious. - 04/10/2011 03:10:50 AM 855 Views
Goodness.. - 04/10/2011 03:20:30 AM 798 Views
Re: - 04/10/2011 03:28:25 AM 817 Views
You know, my mother had a saying. - 04/10/2011 03:39:32 AM 855 Views
I think it's safe to say ... - 04/10/2011 04:09:17 AM 764 Views
I'm not sure which would be sadder... - 04/10/2011 11:32:55 AM 904 Views
*NM* - 04/10/2011 12:19:01 PM 719 Views
Re: You flatter me. *NM* - 04/10/2011 01:31:01 PM 762 Views
OK, you need to delete the "Re:" You're using it incorrectly - 04/10/2011 01:55:53 PM 782 Views
"Re" doesn't have to mean "reply", it can also mean "regarding". - 04/10/2011 02:01:31 PM 784 Views
Re: Re: - 04/10/2011 02:06:58 PM 817 Views
Re: Re: - 04/10/2011 02:12:57 PM 777 Views
Re: Also. - 04/10/2011 02:08:15 PM 820 Views
you are still using it incorrectly. *NM* - 04/10/2011 02:09:48 PM 752 Views
He's doing it on purpose though. - 04/10/2011 03:31:39 PM 887 Views
Re: Yeah, it's just a shtick... - 04/10/2011 03:47:17 PM 795 Views
Those were the good old days. - 04/10/2011 04:02:33 PM 798 Views
*NM* - 04/10/2011 10:02:30 PM 699 Views
I agree, it's driving me nuts *NM* - 04/10/2011 02:36:45 PM 683 Views
That's not quite right, actually. - 04/10/2011 03:25:54 PM 716 Views
Disagree. *NM* - 04/10/2011 10:04:09 PM 736 Views
Considering that "CaptainHammer" is LDS, I'd rather doubt he's gay. - 04/10/2011 02:32:56 AM 754 Views
Heh. Oh, Ryan. - 04/10/2011 04:36:43 PM 909 Views
*sigh* to all of you above.... - 04/10/2011 03:06:21 AM 799 Views
I thought that was "Do not talk about /b/"? *NM* - 04/10/2011 03:12:52 AM 792 Views
i don't know, but if THAT is the first rule... - 04/10/2011 03:41:20 AM 756 Views
Please explain why you think we should consider you Christians. - 03/10/2011 04:33:06 PM 1458 Views
you know, that does make me wonder though - 03/10/2011 04:58:21 PM 1331 Views
We're not as immovable as we are sometimes portrayed. - 03/10/2011 05:27:17 PM 1304 Views
"Even Christ didn't do that"? I can't agree. - 03/10/2011 09:00:34 PM 1322 Views
I conceded your last point. - 03/10/2011 10:14:28 PM 1166 Views
Point of Anal Retentive Dissent: - 04/10/2011 03:54:00 PM 1239 Views
That concept is alien to the Christian theological understanding, however. - 03/10/2011 10:18:55 PM 1326 Views
I understand what both you and Danny are saying - 04/10/2011 12:19:57 AM 1264 Views
Oh, that's very simple - 04/10/2011 04:02:24 AM 1318 Views
I honestly don't know what it would take. - 04/10/2011 07:41:55 AM 1253 Views
thank you, both of you - 04/10/2011 01:46:05 PM 1255 Views
I love the Nicene Creed. It is such an excellent encapsulation. - 03/10/2011 06:07:53 PM 1338 Views
Agreed. - 04/10/2011 04:44:49 PM 1219 Views
The absolute best part about your post (plus the best thing about Mo's/LDS's) - 03/10/2011 09:02:17 PM 1284 Views
Glad you enjoyed it - 03/10/2011 10:10:39 PM 1391 Views
Though they can cause interesting changes in patterns. - 03/10/2011 10:16:55 PM 1342 Views
We believe that Jesus Christ is the Savior of all mankind, and the only way back to God. - 04/10/2011 01:29:30 AM 1393 Views
If you think the Book of Mormon was well-written, there is really little left to discuss. - 04/10/2011 03:57:08 AM 1555 Views
I never said well-written, I said complex. - 04/10/2011 07:04:24 AM 1430 Views
Ignore facts all you want to. - 05/10/2011 01:07:35 AM 1319 Views
Re: If you think the Book of Mormon was well-written, there is really little left to discuss. - 04/10/2011 07:24:27 AM 1543 Views
Woah nelly. - 04/10/2011 10:04:33 AM 1349 Views
I have to "Wow" as well... racist much? - 04/10/2011 01:52:48 PM 1248 Views
Re: I have to "Wow" as well... racist much? - 04/10/2011 04:42:47 PM 1337 Views
oh well that makes it all better... - 04/10/2011 04:54:14 PM 1351 Views
Exactly - 04/10/2011 06:00:54 PM 1261 Views
Was the twin banging and the gay wedding the same event? - 04/10/2011 06:36:03 PM 1340 Views
I guess this is a variation on Hams punishment; Ghav, at least should know better than to be shocked - 04/10/2011 04:13:59 PM 1234 Views
it's not that we're surprised because it's "novel" - 04/10/2011 04:19:16 PM 1268 Views
It is not NECESSARILY racist. - 04/10/2011 04:39:33 PM 1305 Views
Sure, except ... - 04/10/2011 04:50:53 PM 1328 Views
Yeah, circular logic is fun, isn't it? - 05/10/2011 01:09:25 AM 1295 Views
That sounds really nice. - 04/10/2011 06:38:29 PM 1303 Views
Why wait though? - 05/10/2011 12:12:21 AM 1470 Views
So that Vivien can avoid reading and thinking about the stuff that you just wrote. *NM* - 05/10/2011 12:28:23 AM 665 Views
Ack, not reading and thinking111 - 05/10/2011 12:36:11 AM 1253 Views
Yeah, that's what I thought. - 06/10/2011 05:43:57 PM 1246 Views
I'm satisfied by that explanation. - 06/10/2011 08:51:15 PM 1472 Views
Re: I'm satisfied by that explanation. - 07/10/2011 07:45:29 PM 1278 Views
Oh no you idn't... *waves finger and weaves head* - 04/10/2011 03:53:07 AM 1093 Views
....i don't know what you look like - 04/10/2011 03:54:56 AM 1222 Views
Took the words right out of my mouth, repeatedly. - 04/10/2011 12:49:13 PM 1459 Views
Off-Topic - 05/10/2011 01:14:16 AM 1221 Views
Hmm - 05/10/2011 02:03:13 AM 1413 Views
True - 05/10/2011 02:13:00 AM 1205 Views
I think of Protestantism in terms similar to a Xerox copy. - 05/10/2011 04:57:42 AM 1331 Views
Maybe Xeroxes of abridged texts and dumbed down theology - 06/10/2011 02:26:58 AM 1413 Views
I like that analogy - an echo chamber! *NM* - 08/10/2011 10:44:04 PM 722 Views
Re: Off-Topic - 05/10/2011 02:56:50 AM 1432 Views
Uhh... - 05/10/2011 03:08:49 AM 1192 Views
The people at the Nicene Council and the other councils were not prophets. - 05/10/2011 04:59:50 AM 1344 Views
And you know that because... why, again? - 05/10/2011 07:13:53 AM 1303 Views
Tough Crowd. - 03/10/2011 04:44:31 PM 1375 Views
No questions. Have a nice day. - 03/10/2011 11:40:58 PM 1235 Views
Why don't they have anything approaching a formal theology? *NM* - 04/10/2011 03:58:16 AM 792 Views
Re: Why don't they have anything approaching a formal theology? - 04/10/2011 05:23:12 PM 1357 Views

Reply to Message