Active Users:604 Time:14/06/2026 11:11:42 AM
Maybe Xeroxes of abridged texts and dumbed down theology Larry Send a noteboard - 06/10/2011 02:26:58 AM
The Catholic Church was most obviously corrupt and venal when Luther nailed his theses to the church door in Wittenberg. The problem is that, by introducing at once Bibles in the vernacular and the sola scriptura method of theology, each splinter group was a poor copy of what preceded it, to the point where one sees heresies particular to America, such as Jehovah's Witnesses and Mormons, who aren't even Christians because their copy is so garbled and unusable.


True. The further one gets from the actual schism, the worse it gets. It's hard for me to think of a non-ecclesiastical church as being anything more than an echo chamber where the most ignorant can (and do) view themselves as being as knowledgeable as the presumed leaders.

Christians can try to instruct them as to the error of their ways and the crudeness of their scriptures, but at the end of the day all anyone can do with an unrepentant Mormon is feel sorry for them, sigh, shake your head and just ignore their faith.


Quite true. For me, if there is an organization whose history does not date at the latest to the 6th century, that group's theology (or poor excuse for it) will not interest me. Monophysites and Monohelites are much, much more interesting than Campbellites or Mormons.
Illusions fall like the husk of a fruit, one after another, and the fruit is experience. - Narrator, Sylvie

Je suis méchant.
Reply to message
Mormons - 03/10/2011 05:46:10 AM 2704 Views
Questions. - 03/10/2011 11:13:25 AM 1437 Views
Ooh! Ooh! - 03/10/2011 11:18:38 AM 1287 Views
I don't watch it. - 04/10/2011 01:34:53 AM 1340 Views
Re: Questions. - 03/10/2011 01:28:28 PM 1404 Views
Re: Questions. - 03/10/2011 01:31:13 PM 1244 Views
Why did I look up what Quorn is? I didn't need to know that. *NM* - 03/10/2011 02:04:20 PM 770 Views
Wyld Stallyns!! - 03/10/2011 03:26:54 PM 1183 Views
STATION! *NM* - 03/10/2011 11:00:35 PM 696 Views
Re: One of the best replies, ever, on the internet. *NM* - 06/10/2011 02:43:07 AM 744 Views
....did we just get door-to-door'd...ONLINE?!?! *NM* - 03/10/2011 11:34:19 AM 718 Views
Nope. - 04/10/2011 01:32:43 AM 1271 Views
there's no real point to it - 04/10/2011 02:37:24 AM 2292 Views
We could use an evil cackling smilie, we do have some other evil ones - 04/10/2011 02:49:12 AM 1244 Views
wasn't going to argue... *NM* - 04/10/2011 02:57:00 AM 710 Views
Do you ever giggle at the name "Moroni?" - 03/10/2011 11:39:55 AM 1356 Views
There are Mormon literalists? Seriously? *NM* - 03/10/2011 03:02:18 PM 709 Views
I know they don't have multiple wives anymore, so no misconception there - 03/10/2011 01:23:50 PM 1267 Views
There are Fundamentalist "Mormons" who do... - 03/10/2011 11:32:56 PM 1166 Views
Don't get me wrong by the way, I've met wonderful Mormons - 04/10/2011 12:22:03 PM 1245 Views
Question: Why are you such a faggot? *NM* - 03/10/2011 02:23:45 PM 614 Views
Answer: because it's the only way he could return your burning love for him. - 03/10/2011 03:24:23 PM 840 Views
Oh dont be such a fuddy duddy. - 03/10/2011 10:42:06 PM 835 Views
Better a faggot than a fuckwad. Cheers fuckwad! *NM* - 04/10/2011 01:27:20 AM 732 Views
Well, I suppose you'ld be the one to know. *NM* - 04/10/2011 01:54:35 AM 675 Views
Really? You really just pulled a "takes one to know one"? *NM* - 04/10/2011 04:19:22 PM 784 Views
Re: You embarrass yourself. *NM* - 04/10/2011 01:56:02 AM 622 Views
I'll tell you whats embarresing... - 04/10/2011 02:08:02 AM 945 Views
That is hilarious. - 04/10/2011 03:10:50 AM 839 Views
Goodness.. - 04/10/2011 03:20:30 AM 785 Views
Re: - 04/10/2011 03:28:25 AM 803 Views
You know, my mother had a saying. - 04/10/2011 03:39:32 AM 847 Views
I think it's safe to say ... - 04/10/2011 04:09:17 AM 749 Views
I'm not sure which would be sadder... - 04/10/2011 11:32:55 AM 890 Views
*NM* - 04/10/2011 12:19:01 PM 702 Views
Re: You flatter me. *NM* - 04/10/2011 01:31:01 PM 750 Views
OK, you need to delete the "Re:" You're using it incorrectly - 04/10/2011 01:55:53 PM 763 Views
"Re" doesn't have to mean "reply", it can also mean "regarding". - 04/10/2011 02:01:31 PM 773 Views
Re: Re: - 04/10/2011 02:06:58 PM 802 Views
Re: Re: - 04/10/2011 02:12:57 PM 764 Views
Re: Also. - 04/10/2011 02:08:15 PM 805 Views
you are still using it incorrectly. *NM* - 04/10/2011 02:09:48 PM 741 Views
He's doing it on purpose though. - 04/10/2011 03:31:39 PM 872 Views
Re: Yeah, it's just a shtick... - 04/10/2011 03:47:17 PM 779 Views
Those were the good old days. - 04/10/2011 04:02:33 PM 778 Views
*NM* - 04/10/2011 10:02:30 PM 687 Views
I agree, it's driving me nuts *NM* - 04/10/2011 02:36:45 PM 667 Views
That's not quite right, actually. - 04/10/2011 03:25:54 PM 695 Views
Disagree. *NM* - 04/10/2011 10:04:09 PM 720 Views
Considering that "CaptainHammer" is LDS, I'd rather doubt he's gay. - 04/10/2011 02:32:56 AM 733 Views
Heh. Oh, Ryan. - 04/10/2011 04:36:43 PM 887 Views
*sigh* to all of you above.... - 04/10/2011 03:06:21 AM 783 Views
I thought that was "Do not talk about /b/"? *NM* - 04/10/2011 03:12:52 AM 778 Views
i don't know, but if THAT is the first rule... - 04/10/2011 03:41:20 AM 739 Views
Please explain why you think we should consider you Christians. - 03/10/2011 04:33:06 PM 1429 Views
you know, that does make me wonder though - 03/10/2011 04:58:21 PM 1305 Views
We're not as immovable as we are sometimes portrayed. - 03/10/2011 05:27:17 PM 1279 Views
"Even Christ didn't do that"? I can't agree. - 03/10/2011 09:00:34 PM 1293 Views
I conceded your last point. - 03/10/2011 10:14:28 PM 1144 Views
Point of Anal Retentive Dissent: - 04/10/2011 03:54:00 PM 1212 Views
That concept is alien to the Christian theological understanding, however. - 03/10/2011 10:18:55 PM 1294 Views
I understand what both you and Danny are saying - 04/10/2011 12:19:57 AM 1240 Views
Oh, that's very simple - 04/10/2011 04:02:24 AM 1289 Views
I honestly don't know what it would take. - 04/10/2011 07:41:55 AM 1231 Views
thank you, both of you - 04/10/2011 01:46:05 PM 1229 Views
I love the Nicene Creed. It is such an excellent encapsulation. - 03/10/2011 06:07:53 PM 1315 Views
Agreed. - 04/10/2011 04:44:49 PM 1196 Views
The absolute best part about your post (plus the best thing about Mo's/LDS's) - 03/10/2011 09:02:17 PM 1258 Views
Glad you enjoyed it - 03/10/2011 10:10:39 PM 1366 Views
Though they can cause interesting changes in patterns. - 03/10/2011 10:16:55 PM 1322 Views
We believe that Jesus Christ is the Savior of all mankind, and the only way back to God. - 04/10/2011 01:29:30 AM 1363 Views
If you think the Book of Mormon was well-written, there is really little left to discuss. - 04/10/2011 03:57:08 AM 1529 Views
I never said well-written, I said complex. - 04/10/2011 07:04:24 AM 1399 Views
Ignore facts all you want to. - 05/10/2011 01:07:35 AM 1298 Views
Re: If you think the Book of Mormon was well-written, there is really little left to discuss. - 04/10/2011 07:24:27 AM 1513 Views
Woah nelly. - 04/10/2011 10:04:33 AM 1328 Views
I have to "Wow" as well... racist much? - 04/10/2011 01:52:48 PM 1223 Views
Re: I have to "Wow" as well... racist much? - 04/10/2011 04:42:47 PM 1318 Views
oh well that makes it all better... - 04/10/2011 04:54:14 PM 1326 Views
Exactly - 04/10/2011 06:00:54 PM 1240 Views
Was the twin banging and the gay wedding the same event? - 04/10/2011 06:36:03 PM 1311 Views
I guess this is a variation on Hams punishment; Ghav, at least should know better than to be shocked - 04/10/2011 04:13:59 PM 1203 Views
it's not that we're surprised because it's "novel" - 04/10/2011 04:19:16 PM 1241 Views
It is not NECESSARILY racist. - 04/10/2011 04:39:33 PM 1286 Views
Sure, except ... - 04/10/2011 04:50:53 PM 1304 Views
Yeah, circular logic is fun, isn't it? - 05/10/2011 01:09:25 AM 1251 Views
That sounds really nice. - 04/10/2011 06:38:29 PM 1278 Views
Why wait though? - 05/10/2011 12:12:21 AM 1436 Views
So that Vivien can avoid reading and thinking about the stuff that you just wrote. *NM* - 05/10/2011 12:28:23 AM 648 Views
Ack, not reading and thinking111 - 05/10/2011 12:36:11 AM 1234 Views
Yeah, that's what I thought. - 06/10/2011 05:43:57 PM 1220 Views
I'm satisfied by that explanation. - 06/10/2011 08:51:15 PM 1443 Views
Re: I'm satisfied by that explanation. - 07/10/2011 07:45:29 PM 1258 Views
Oh no you idn't... *waves finger and weaves head* - 04/10/2011 03:53:07 AM 1071 Views
....i don't know what you look like - 04/10/2011 03:54:56 AM 1197 Views
Took the words right out of my mouth, repeatedly. - 04/10/2011 12:49:13 PM 1433 Views
Off-Topic - 05/10/2011 01:14:16 AM 1196 Views
Hmm - 05/10/2011 02:03:13 AM 1384 Views
True - 05/10/2011 02:13:00 AM 1179 Views
I think of Protestantism in terms similar to a Xerox copy. - 05/10/2011 04:57:42 AM 1296 Views
Maybe Xeroxes of abridged texts and dumbed down theology - 06/10/2011 02:26:58 AM 1388 Views
I like that analogy - an echo chamber! *NM* - 08/10/2011 10:44:04 PM 705 Views
Re: Off-Topic - 05/10/2011 02:56:50 AM 1412 Views
Uhh... - 05/10/2011 03:08:49 AM 1168 Views
The people at the Nicene Council and the other councils were not prophets. - 05/10/2011 04:59:50 AM 1320 Views
And you know that because... why, again? - 05/10/2011 07:13:53 AM 1277 Views
Tough Crowd. - 03/10/2011 04:44:31 PM 1353 Views
No questions. Have a nice day. - 03/10/2011 11:40:58 PM 1213 Views
Why don't they have anything approaching a formal theology? *NM* - 04/10/2011 03:58:16 AM 777 Views
Re: Why don't they have anything approaching a formal theology? - 04/10/2011 05:23:12 PM 1331 Views

Reply to Message