Ah yes, the wonderful "dissmiss the person who disagrees with me by insulting him tactic"
HyogaRott Send a noteboard - 28/02/2011 02:30:35 PM
As for snobbery, I think "violently stupid" is the best characterization of you possible. You wrote:
"You may like On Walden Pond, I think he was a complete loser that should be hit upside his head with the hammer he was so proud of stealing. You may find The Invisible Man to be a thought provoking insight into racial oppression. I just think the guy should STFU and get on with living his life."
Violent? Certainly. Stupid? Even more so.
Best of luck with that GED, if you ever decide to pursue it.
"You may like On Walden Pond, I think he was a complete loser that should be hit upside his head with the hammer he was so proud of stealing. You may find The Invisible Man to be a thought provoking insight into racial oppression. I just think the guy should STFU and get on with living his life."
Violent? Certainly. Stupid? Even more so.
Best of luck with that GED, if you ever decide to pursue it.
That is an absolute classic in the ELEMENTARY school system:
I disagree
Well you’re stupid.
Why do you hold your opinion.
You are ugly too.
Why won’t you answer my question?
Your mommy is ugly too! and my daddy can beat up your daddy..
My advanced studies English professors in college had other opinions about me but then again I actually cared about their opinions somewhat; yours are meaningless.
Haven't seen that MENSA invite or IQ score from you yet, probably won't either.
Also, still waiting for you to make some sort of justification of your positions; but I am not holding my breath. If you were capable of explaining yourself you would have. Because you have not, one is only left to assume that you can not.
Like many insecure people, when challenged on your so called "expertise" you only react with childish insults and hide behind your self-believed superiority. It is a truly pathetic mannerism and I had hoped for better. Have you sought any sort of counseling? I'm not offering my services, but you should really seek help to deal with your insecurities. It might make you a happier more understanding person.
To quote Mick Foley, Have A Nice Day.

Can someone explain to me how Jordan is not a particularly good writer?
- 21/02/2011 05:41:31 PM
3494 Views
I personally see it as more of RJ being a fantastic story teller, but not a well structured writer.
- 21/02/2011 06:44:21 PM
1924 Views
Re: I personally see it as more of RJ being a fantastic story teller, but not a well structured
- 22/02/2011 10:59:25 PM
1594 Views
What do you think about the Southern Gothic authors?
- 23/02/2011 08:08:26 AM
1414 Views
Re: What do you think about the Southern Gothic authors?
- 23/02/2011 10:51:57 AM
1499 Views
For the same reason that most people think they have above average intelligence.
- 21/02/2011 11:13:34 PM
1912 Views
Re: For the same reason that most people think they have above average intelligence. *NM*
- 22/02/2011 02:39:20 PM
1069 Views
Re: For the same reason that most people think they have above average intelligence.
- 22/02/2011 02:41:37 PM
1386 Views
That's possibly the best explanation of literary criticism I've ever seen.
- 23/02/2011 02:47:12 AM
1472 Views
I can take a shot at that, since nobody else seems willing to.
- 22/02/2011 07:29:20 AM
1986 Views
- 22/02/2011 07:29:20 AM
1986 Views
Re: I can take a shot at that, since nobody else seems willing to.
- 22/02/2011 11:23:38 PM
1620 Views
- 22/02/2011 11:23:38 PM
1620 Views
That has very little to do with anything unless you can provide a real-world analogy to a channeler.
- 22/02/2011 11:30:52 PM
1481 Views
Re: That has very little to do with anything unless you can provide a real-world analogy to a
- 23/02/2011 12:02:24 AM
1494 Views
As far as I'm concerned, the only way to gauge whether an author is good or not is ...
- 22/02/2011 03:58:17 PM
1526 Views
Re: Can someone explain to me how Jordan is not a particularly good writer?
- 22/02/2011 06:27:11 PM
2442 Views
I think it has more to do with limitations imposed by how the story was organized and edited.
- 22/02/2011 07:50:18 PM
1810 Views
That's interesting, and I have a weird agree/disagree here; also, that Adam Roberts sucks
- 23/02/2011 02:15:12 AM
1587 Views
Re: That's interesting, and I have a weird agree/disagree here; also, that Adam Roberts sucks
- 23/02/2011 11:02:14 AM
1533 Views
adam roberts reviews
- 23/02/2011 03:53:49 AM
1650 Views
And I suspect those who prefer the BS books are those who largely read WoT for the story. *NM*
- 23/02/2011 08:06:16 AM
922 Views
Oh GAWD!... not another pointer to Robert Adam's incoherant muckraking
- 24/02/2011 07:47:35 PM
1438 Views
I think DomA answered the question best, but the "do you like it" argument is weak.
- 22/02/2011 10:32:51 PM
1853 Views
Re: I think DomA answered the question best, but the "do you like it" argument is weak.
- 22/02/2011 11:16:24 PM
1750 Views
The Necronomicon isn't actually a book, you know.
*NM*
- 22/02/2011 11:28:29 PM
863 Views
*NM*
- 22/02/2011 11:28:29 PM
863 Views
There are nine, actually...
- 23/02/2011 12:04:55 AM
1704 Views
Lovecraft's Necronomicon was fictitious. If you want to count fanfiction, fine. *NM*
- 23/02/2011 12:38:07 AM
934 Views
Based on how poorly worded that response was, I'm not sure what to think of it. *NM*
- 23/02/2011 12:13:00 AM
942 Views
I hope I am misunderstanding you.
- 23/02/2011 10:57:47 PM
1359 Views
Re: I hope I am misunderstanding you.
- 24/02/2011 10:41:09 AM
1520 Views
If the core of the story is all that matters, why read a book
- 24/02/2011 10:32:01 PM
1465 Views
Re: If the core of the story is all that matters, why read a book
- 24/02/2011 11:23:42 PM
1444 Views
So wait, style is good?
- 25/02/2011 12:32:07 AM
1737 Views
That depends...
- 23/02/2011 03:00:35 AM
1651 Views
I didn't say aesthetics was the primary criterion. I named three criteria.
- 23/02/2011 05:39:03 AM
1526 Views
the "do you like it" is the most important criterion
- 23/02/2011 10:45:17 PM
1488 Views
If you don't mind me asking...
- 24/02/2011 01:05:12 AM
1409 Views
I don't mind that you ask, but I'm not going to engage in a defense of literature.
- 24/02/2011 05:35:27 PM
1368 Views
Re: I don't mind that you ask, but I'm not going to engage in a defense of literature.
- 24/02/2011 11:26:55 PM
1437 Views
I'm sure you have a wonderful job awaiting in fast food service.
- 25/02/2011 01:57:15 AM
1505 Views
Re: I'm sure you have a wonderful job awaiting in fast food service.
- 25/02/2011 08:56:06 AM
1446 Views
...
- 25/02/2011 01:07:22 AM
1340 Views
It is not a serious question.
- 25/02/2011 01:53:59 AM
1479 Views
Is that so?
- 25/02/2011 05:58:31 AM
1613 Views
I'm not fixated with Jordan.
- 25/02/2011 03:13:56 PM
1456 Views
Then why do you keep trying to qualify the passage in relation to him?
- 25/02/2011 06:29:31 PM
1495 Views
You're conflating two things.
- 25/02/2011 07:32:59 PM
1585 Views
All right, now we're getting somewhere.
- 26/02/2011 12:40:57 AM
1454 Views
Okay, here you go. I am giving you the benefit of the doubt as to your sincerity.
- 26/02/2011 03:20:44 PM
1296 Views
Thank you, and I agree with all your explanations. *NM*
- 26/02/2011 07:28:09 PM
842 Views
No, it is a serious question, just one that can never be seriously answered.
- 25/02/2011 03:28:48 PM
1487 Views
Your opinion isn't as valid as anyone else's if that's your opinion.
- 25/02/2011 04:44:57 PM
1593 Views
Re: Your opinion isn't as valid as anyone else's if that's your opinion.
- 25/02/2011 06:05:18 PM
1933 Views
I'm not wasting my time proving something to an internet moron and troll like you.
- 25/02/2011 07:36:19 PM
1336 Views
Ah yes, the wonderful "dissmiss the person who disagrees with me by insulting him tactic"
- 28/02/2011 02:30:35 PM
1334 Views
Re: Your opinion isn't as valid as anyone else's if that's your opinion.
- 26/02/2011 11:06:26 AM
1325 Views
Re: I find this whole thing elitist and more than a bit silly
- 23/02/2011 06:45:05 AM
1645 Views
Why do you think mind-expanding literature is restricted to the classics?
- 23/02/2011 08:03:59 AM
1349 Views
Re: Why do you think mind-expanding literature is restricted to the classics?
- 23/02/2011 09:25:10 AM
1528 Views
Of course people read for pleasure.
- 23/02/2011 09:04:24 PM
1375 Views
Ok...
- 24/02/2011 08:59:27 AM
1376 Views
"Yeah well, that's, like, just your opinion, man." Good argument.
- 24/02/2011 03:43:24 PM
1486 Views
I'm curious to hear who Tom and DomA consider a "very good writer"?
- 24/02/2011 05:49:13 PM
1493 Views
Among living writers?
- 24/02/2011 08:16:08 PM
1543 Views
My list would be similar...
- 26/02/2011 07:24:11 AM
1650 Views
That was a very good list.
- 26/02/2011 03:07:31 PM
1566 Views
Re: That was a very good list.
- 27/02/2011 04:51:43 AM
1556 Views
Oh, and another question
- 27/02/2011 05:28:47 PM
1228 Views
Re: Oh, and another question
- 01/03/2011 03:42:02 AM
1503 Views
I think the two of you have taken too narrow a meaning of 'great'
- 27/02/2011 11:14:30 AM
1675 Views
Re: I think the two of you have taken too narrow a meaning of 'great'
- 28/02/2011 11:51:49 PM
1570 Views
Re: I think the two of you have taken too narrow a meaning of 'great'
- 03/03/2011 12:01:30 AM
1571 Views
Re: I think the two of you have taken too narrow a meaning of 'great'
- 03/03/2011 02:17:06 PM
1464 Views
He's a great storyteller, but his prose is somewhat uninspiring. *NM*
- 27/02/2011 07:28:00 PM
955 Views
