RJ never really explains how it interacts with the OP, but direct use of the OP against it just makes it "harder".
It would stand to reason that the armor would offer protection to some greater or lesser effect against direct OP assault (exploding heads from Ashaman, or Aes Sedai fireballs) and would offere some sort of protection from even indirect assault due to its natural properties (non-conductive, resistant to traumatic impact, etc.) Not saying that an individual channeller couldn't stop a swordsman in full cuendillar plate, helm, and shield 1 on 1, but a group that were so equipped would be much more resistant to the efforts of a channeler trying to stop them with the standard OP indirect effects used in battles.
Even the deathgates and arrows of fire that Rand and Logain used in the big trollock battle would be of greatly reduced effectiveness.
**side note for discussion/speculation, can the edge of a gateway cut cuendillar?
It would stand to reason that the armor would offer protection to some greater or lesser effect against direct OP assault (exploding heads from Ashaman, or Aes Sedai fireballs) and would offere some sort of protection from even indirect assault due to its natural properties (non-conductive, resistant to traumatic impact, etc.) Not saying that an individual channeller couldn't stop a swordsman in full cuendillar plate, helm, and shield 1 on 1, but a group that were so equipped would be much more resistant to the efforts of a channeler trying to stop them with the standard OP indirect effects used in battles.
Even the deathgates and arrows of fire that Rand and Logain used in the big trollock battle would be of greatly reduced effectiveness.
**side note for discussion/speculation, can the edge of a gateway cut cuendillar?
Functional Cuendillar Armor: Possible or impossible?
- 10/02/2012 04:45:34 PM
1757 Views
You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion
- 10/02/2012 06:29:28 PM
1221 Views
I suppose I am on a...
- 10/02/2012 11:00:47 PM
1155 Views
Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion
- 10/02/2012 11:04:33 PM
1247 Views
Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion
- 11/02/2012 01:37:27 PM
1300 Views
My thought was always about weapons.
- 11/02/2012 06:31:45 AM
1356 Views
Certainly possible, but given the effort most women have to put toward changing even a small item
- 12/02/2012 05:10:35 AM
1220 Views
Ummm, Warders...
- 14/02/2012 01:39:23 PM
1087 Views
How would Cuendillar armour help against channelers?
- 14/02/2012 07:58:58 PM
1136 Views
It can not be directly effected by the OP
- 14/02/2012 09:08:57 PM
1019 Views
some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such.
- 14/02/2012 09:52:41 PM
1193 Views
Re: some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such.
- 14/02/2012 10:54:26 PM
1001 Views
which way is it?
- 15/02/2012 04:14:41 AM
1012 Views
Actually I'd call the Seanchan tactically inferior to the White Tower in using the power
- 15/02/2012 01:48:55 PM
1120 Views
That's really not my point.
- 15/02/2012 03:21:15 PM
1020 Views
I never said that they could not be stopped
- 15/02/2012 01:58:41 PM
1105 Views
I really think you're over-estimating how difficult it would be.
- 15/02/2012 03:22:44 PM
1075 Views
Not nesecarrily
- 15/02/2012 04:01:45 PM
1054 Views
You just said that most of their tactics are indirect.
- 15/02/2012 05:44:22 PM
1162 Views
..and you are creating new tactics
- 15/02/2012 06:32:02 PM
1035 Views
*shrug* I don't see it as some world-shaking action
- 15/02/2012 08:47:40 PM
988 Views
But it is brand new, and if you're digging holes earth-shaking seems discriptive 
- 15/02/2012 09:14:12 PM
1053 Views
- 15/02/2012 09:14:12 PM
1053 Views
Not accurate
- 15/02/2012 03:54:00 PM
1125 Views
You are thinking too far inside the box
- 15/02/2012 04:23:28 PM
1105 Views
I disagree
- 15/02/2012 04:43:33 PM
1058 Views
If armor is of no benefit...
- 15/02/2012 06:19:30 PM
987 Views
Missing my point ... Cuendillar armor is impractical not useless
- 15/02/2012 07:00:48 PM
1126 Views
nope
- 15/02/2012 07:21:03 PM
994 Views
*Shrug*
- 15/02/2012 08:28:48 PM
1161 Views
Re: *Shrug*
- 15/02/2012 09:07:24 PM
1323 Views
No way they could pull off what you are talking about with current tech
- 16/02/2012 01:55:19 AM
1118 Views
Re: No way they could pull off what you are talking about with current tech
- 16/02/2012 03:23:34 PM
1028 Views
Re: It can not be directly effected by the OP
- 15/02/2012 02:37:40 AM
1000 Views
Maybe, maybe not
- 15/02/2012 02:12:59 PM
984 Views
Re: Maybe, maybe not
- 15/02/2012 06:11:42 PM
1179 Views
I'll happily amend my initial statement to "maybe even challeling ones"
- 15/02/2012 07:03:48 PM
1014 Views
what a lot of people are forgetting with their suggestions of plate armor...
- 13/02/2012 02:36:50 PM
1189 Views
Your understanding of how plate armor functions is in error
- 14/02/2012 01:45:37 PM
1040 Views
I believe AND I was hoping you would go into the physics of it :p
- 14/02/2012 11:01:18 PM
1024 Views