Active Users:991 Time:18/09/2026 12:03:06 PM
It can not be directly effected by the OP HyogaRott Send a noteboard - 14/02/2012 09:08:57 PM
RJ never really explains how it interacts with the OP, but direct use of the OP against it just makes it "harder".

It would stand to reason that the armor would offer protection to some greater or lesser effect against direct OP assault (exploding heads from Ashaman, or Aes Sedai fireballs) and would offere some sort of protection from even indirect assault due to its natural properties (non-conductive, resistant to traumatic impact, etc.) Not saying that an individual channeller couldn't stop a swordsman in full cuendillar plate, helm, and shield 1 on 1, but a group that were so equipped would be much more resistant to the efforts of a channeler trying to stop them with the standard OP indirect effects used in battles.

Even the deathgates and arrows of fire that Rand and Logain used in the big trollock battle would be of greatly reduced effectiveness.

**side note for discussion/speculation, can the edge of a gateway cut cuendillar?
Reply to message
Functional Cuendillar Armor: Possible or impossible? - 10/02/2012 04:45:34 PM 1811 Views
You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion - 10/02/2012 06:29:28 PM 1268 Views
You busted him! I wonder why he would post it again... *NM* - 10/02/2012 07:25:47 PM 659 Views
I suppose I am on a... - 10/02/2012 11:00:47 PM 1207 Views
No, you go back and re-read what everyone said. - 11/02/2012 11:02:47 PM 1276 Views
We're actually losing them by the troves. My apologies. *NM* - 12/02/2012 02:52:01 AM 638 Views
I rest my case. - 10/05/2012 04:34:02 PM 1175 Views
Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion - 11/02/2012 01:37:27 PM 1353 Views
Agreed. - 11/02/2012 06:24:36 PM 1132 Views
why not some plate armor. duh. *NM* - 12/02/2012 09:54:43 PM 692 Views
See? - 10/05/2012 04:35:25 PM 1155 Views
Possible, but hard. - 11/02/2012 01:56:03 AM 1303 Views
scale or plate armor would be quite easy *NM* - 11/02/2012 01:38:47 PM 579 Views
My thought was always about weapons. - 11/02/2012 06:31:45 AM 1402 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. - 12/02/2012 10:51:43 AM 1199 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. - 14/02/2012 01:53:59 PM 1181 Views
Should be perfectly feasible - 11/02/2012 12:28:47 PM 1179 Views
Exactly - 11/02/2012 01:53:24 PM 1195 Views
Certainly possible, but given the effort most women have to put toward changing even a small item - 12/02/2012 05:10:35 AM 1267 Views
Ummm, Warders... - 14/02/2012 01:39:23 PM 1134 Views
How would Cuendillar armour help against channelers? - 14/02/2012 07:58:58 PM 1184 Views
It can not be directly effected by the OP - 14/02/2012 09:08:57 PM 1076 Views
some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. - 14/02/2012 09:52:41 PM 1247 Views
Re: some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. - 14/02/2012 10:54:26 PM 1051 Views
which way is it? - 15/02/2012 04:14:41 AM 1057 Views
Actually I'd call the Seanchan tactically inferior to the White Tower in using the power - 15/02/2012 01:48:55 PM 1192 Views
That's really not my point. - 15/02/2012 03:21:15 PM 1071 Views
My point is - 15/02/2012 03:52:43 PM 1038 Views
Agree on all points *NM* - 15/02/2012 07:06:09 PM 719 Views
I never said that they could not be stopped - 15/02/2012 01:58:41 PM 1154 Views
I really think you're over-estimating how difficult it would be. - 15/02/2012 03:22:44 PM 1137 Views
Not nesecarrily - 15/02/2012 04:01:45 PM 1101 Views
You just said that most of their tactics are indirect. - 15/02/2012 05:44:22 PM 1207 Views
..and you are creating new tactics - 15/02/2012 06:32:02 PM 1083 Views
*shrug* I don't see it as some world-shaking action - 15/02/2012 08:47:40 PM 1054 Views
Not accurate - 15/02/2012 03:54:00 PM 1184 Views
You are thinking too far inside the box - 15/02/2012 04:23:28 PM 1177 Views
I disagree - 15/02/2012 04:43:33 PM 1106 Views
If armor is of no benefit... - 15/02/2012 06:19:30 PM 1055 Views
Missing my point ... Cuendillar armor is impractical not useless - 15/02/2012 07:00:48 PM 1223 Views
nope - 15/02/2012 07:21:03 PM 1058 Views
*Shrug* - 15/02/2012 08:28:48 PM 1235 Views
Re: *Shrug* - 15/02/2012 09:07:24 PM 1377 Views
No way they could pull off what you are talking about with current tech - 16/02/2012 01:55:19 AM 1178 Views
Re: It can not be directly effected by the OP - 15/02/2012 02:37:40 AM 1047 Views
Maybe, maybe not - 15/02/2012 02:12:59 PM 1056 Views
Re: Maybe, maybe not - 15/02/2012 06:11:42 PM 1226 Views
I'll happily amend my initial statement to "maybe even challeling ones" - 15/02/2012 07:03:48 PM 1072 Views
Fair enough. - 16/02/2012 02:08:19 AM 1074 Views
what a lot of people are forgetting with their suggestions of plate armor... - 13/02/2012 02:36:50 PM 1237 Views
Your understanding of how plate armor functions is in error - 14/02/2012 01:45:37 PM 1102 Views
I believe AND I was hoping you would go into the physics of it :p - 14/02/2012 11:01:18 PM 1075 Views
here ya go, I still skipped almost all of the math though. - 15/02/2012 03:00:09 PM 1206 Views
Two things: *NM* - 16/02/2012 04:03:52 PM 653 Views

Reply to Message