Active Users:177 Time:18/05/2024 06:28:02 AM
It can not be directly effected by the OP HyogaRott Send a noteboard - 14/02/2012 09:08:57 PM
RJ never really explains how it interacts with the OP, but direct use of the OP against it just makes it "harder".

It would stand to reason that the armor would offer protection to some greater or lesser effect against direct OP assault (exploding heads from Ashaman, or Aes Sedai fireballs) and would offere some sort of protection from even indirect assault due to its natural properties (non-conductive, resistant to traumatic impact, etc.) Not saying that an individual channeller couldn't stop a swordsman in full cuendillar plate, helm, and shield 1 on 1, but a group that were so equipped would be much more resistant to the efforts of a channeler trying to stop them with the standard OP indirect effects used in battles.

Even the deathgates and arrows of fire that Rand and Logain used in the big trollock battle would be of greatly reduced effectiveness.

**side note for discussion/speculation, can the edge of a gateway cut cuendillar?
Reply to message
Functional Cuendillar Armor: Possible or impossible? - 10/02/2012 04:45:34 PM 1331 Views
You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion - 10/02/2012 06:29:28 PM 778 Views
You busted him! I wonder why he would post it again... *NM* - 10/02/2012 07:25:47 PM 417 Views
I suppose I am on a... - 10/02/2012 11:00:47 PM 685 Views
No, you go back and re-read what everyone said. - 11/02/2012 11:02:47 PM 767 Views
We're actually losing them by the troves. My apologies. *NM* - 12/02/2012 02:52:01 AM 374 Views
I rest my case. - 10/05/2012 04:34:02 PM 667 Views
Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion - 11/02/2012 01:37:27 PM 879 Views
Agreed. - 11/02/2012 06:24:36 PM 671 Views
why not some plate armor. duh. *NM* - 12/02/2012 09:54:43 PM 419 Views
See? - 10/05/2012 04:35:25 PM 662 Views
Possible, but hard. - 11/02/2012 01:56:03 AM 763 Views
scale or plate armor would be quite easy *NM* - 11/02/2012 01:38:47 PM 351 Views
My thought was always about weapons. - 11/02/2012 06:31:45 AM 845 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. - 12/02/2012 10:51:43 AM 716 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. - 14/02/2012 01:53:59 PM 685 Views
Should be perfectly feasible - 11/02/2012 12:28:47 PM 688 Views
Exactly - 11/02/2012 01:53:24 PM 730 Views
Certainly possible, but given the effort most women have to put toward changing even a small item - 12/02/2012 05:10:35 AM 782 Views
Ummm, Warders... - 14/02/2012 01:39:23 PM 624 Views
How would Cuendillar armour help against channelers? - 14/02/2012 07:58:58 PM 664 Views
It can not be directly effected by the OP - 14/02/2012 09:08:57 PM 590 Views
some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. - 14/02/2012 09:52:41 PM 732 Views
Re: some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. - 14/02/2012 10:54:26 PM 571 Views
which way is it? - 15/02/2012 04:14:41 AM 583 Views
Actually I'd call the Seanchan tactically inferior to the White Tower in using the power - 15/02/2012 01:48:55 PM 673 Views
That's really not my point. - 15/02/2012 03:21:15 PM 578 Views
My point is - 15/02/2012 03:52:43 PM 573 Views
Agree on all points *NM* - 15/02/2012 07:06:09 PM 496 Views
I never said that they could not be stopped - 15/02/2012 01:58:41 PM 663 Views
I really think you're over-estimating how difficult it would be. - 15/02/2012 03:22:44 PM 612 Views
Not nesecarrily - 15/02/2012 04:01:45 PM 631 Views
You just said that most of their tactics are indirect. - 15/02/2012 05:44:22 PM 728 Views
..and you are creating new tactics - 15/02/2012 06:32:02 PM 580 Views
*shrug* I don't see it as some world-shaking action - 15/02/2012 08:47:40 PM 592 Views
Not accurate - 15/02/2012 03:54:00 PM 667 Views
You are thinking too far inside the box - 15/02/2012 04:23:28 PM 670 Views
I disagree - 15/02/2012 04:43:33 PM 631 Views
If armor is of no benefit... - 15/02/2012 06:19:30 PM 535 Views
Missing my point ... Cuendillar armor is impractical not useless - 15/02/2012 07:00:48 PM 672 Views
nope - 15/02/2012 07:21:03 PM 541 Views
*Shrug* - 15/02/2012 08:28:48 PM 670 Views
Re: *Shrug* - 15/02/2012 09:07:24 PM 847 Views
Re: It can not be directly effected by the OP - 15/02/2012 02:37:40 AM 578 Views
Maybe, maybe not - 15/02/2012 02:12:59 PM 538 Views
Re: Maybe, maybe not - 15/02/2012 06:11:42 PM 688 Views
I'll happily amend my initial statement to "maybe even challeling ones" - 15/02/2012 07:03:48 PM 581 Views
Fair enough. - 16/02/2012 02:08:19 AM 583 Views
what a lot of people are forgetting with their suggestions of plate armor... - 13/02/2012 02:36:50 PM 740 Views
Your understanding of how plate armor functions is in error - 14/02/2012 01:45:37 PM 580 Views
I believe AND I was hoping you would go into the physics of it :p - 14/02/2012 11:01:18 PM 552 Views
here ya go, I still skipped almost all of the math though. - 15/02/2012 03:00:09 PM 620 Views
Two things: *NM* - 16/02/2012 04:03:52 PM 392 Views

Reply to Message