Active Users:499 Time:03/08/2026 05:14:46 PM
It can not be directly effected by the OP HyogaRott Send a noteboard - 14/02/2012 09:08:57 PM
RJ never really explains how it interacts with the OP, but direct use of the OP against it just makes it "harder".

It would stand to reason that the armor would offer protection to some greater or lesser effect against direct OP assault (exploding heads from Ashaman, or Aes Sedai fireballs) and would offere some sort of protection from even indirect assault due to its natural properties (non-conductive, resistant to traumatic impact, etc.) Not saying that an individual channeller couldn't stop a swordsman in full cuendillar plate, helm, and shield 1 on 1, but a group that were so equipped would be much more resistant to the efforts of a channeler trying to stop them with the standard OP indirect effects used in battles.

Even the deathgates and arrows of fire that Rand and Logain used in the big trollock battle would be of greatly reduced effectiveness.

**side note for discussion/speculation, can the edge of a gateway cut cuendillar?
Reply to message
Functional Cuendillar Armor: Possible or impossible? - 10/02/2012 04:45:34 PM 1782 Views
You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion - 10/02/2012 06:29:28 PM 1242 Views
You busted him! I wonder why he would post it again... *NM* - 10/02/2012 07:25:47 PM 649 Views
I suppose I am on a... - 10/02/2012 11:00:47 PM 1180 Views
No, you go back and re-read what everyone said. - 11/02/2012 11:02:47 PM 1255 Views
We're actually losing them by the troves. My apologies. *NM* - 12/02/2012 02:52:01 AM 615 Views
I rest my case. - 10/05/2012 04:34:02 PM 1151 Views
Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion - 11/02/2012 01:37:27 PM 1324 Views
Agreed. - 11/02/2012 06:24:36 PM 1116 Views
why not some plate armor. duh. *NM* - 12/02/2012 09:54:43 PM 660 Views
See? - 10/05/2012 04:35:25 PM 1132 Views
Possible, but hard. - 11/02/2012 01:56:03 AM 1286 Views
scale or plate armor would be quite easy *NM* - 11/02/2012 01:38:47 PM 569 Views
My thought was always about weapons. - 11/02/2012 06:31:45 AM 1384 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. - 12/02/2012 10:51:43 AM 1177 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. - 14/02/2012 01:53:59 PM 1155 Views
Should be perfectly feasible - 11/02/2012 12:28:47 PM 1161 Views
Exactly - 11/02/2012 01:53:24 PM 1172 Views
Certainly possible, but given the effort most women have to put toward changing even a small item - 12/02/2012 05:10:35 AM 1246 Views
Ummm, Warders... - 14/02/2012 01:39:23 PM 1110 Views
How would Cuendillar armour help against channelers? - 14/02/2012 07:58:58 PM 1163 Views
It can not be directly effected by the OP - 14/02/2012 09:08:57 PM 1046 Views
some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. - 14/02/2012 09:52:41 PM 1222 Views
Re: some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. - 14/02/2012 10:54:26 PM 1027 Views
which way is it? - 15/02/2012 04:14:41 AM 1035 Views
Actually I'd call the Seanchan tactically inferior to the White Tower in using the power - 15/02/2012 01:48:55 PM 1153 Views
That's really not my point. - 15/02/2012 03:21:15 PM 1051 Views
My point is - 15/02/2012 03:52:43 PM 1016 Views
Agree on all points *NM* - 15/02/2012 07:06:09 PM 707 Views
I never said that they could not be stopped - 15/02/2012 01:58:41 PM 1131 Views
I really think you're over-estimating how difficult it would be. - 15/02/2012 03:22:44 PM 1103 Views
Not nesecarrily - 15/02/2012 04:01:45 PM 1083 Views
You just said that most of their tactics are indirect. - 15/02/2012 05:44:22 PM 1188 Views
..and you are creating new tactics - 15/02/2012 06:32:02 PM 1063 Views
*shrug* I don't see it as some world-shaking action - 15/02/2012 08:47:40 PM 1023 Views
Not accurate - 15/02/2012 03:54:00 PM 1152 Views
You are thinking too far inside the box - 15/02/2012 04:23:28 PM 1140 Views
I disagree - 15/02/2012 04:43:33 PM 1085 Views
If armor is of no benefit... - 15/02/2012 06:19:30 PM 1028 Views
Missing my point ... Cuendillar armor is impractical not useless - 15/02/2012 07:00:48 PM 1176 Views
nope - 15/02/2012 07:21:03 PM 1026 Views
*Shrug* - 15/02/2012 08:28:48 PM 1195 Views
Re: *Shrug* - 15/02/2012 09:07:24 PM 1348 Views
No way they could pull off what you are talking about with current tech - 16/02/2012 01:55:19 AM 1147 Views
Re: It can not be directly effected by the OP - 15/02/2012 02:37:40 AM 1027 Views
Maybe, maybe not - 15/02/2012 02:12:59 PM 1015 Views
Re: Maybe, maybe not - 15/02/2012 06:11:42 PM 1206 Views
I'll happily amend my initial statement to "maybe even challeling ones" - 15/02/2012 07:03:48 PM 1042 Views
Fair enough. - 16/02/2012 02:08:19 AM 1047 Views
what a lot of people are forgetting with their suggestions of plate armor... - 13/02/2012 02:36:50 PM 1211 Views
Your understanding of how plate armor functions is in error - 14/02/2012 01:45:37 PM 1059 Views
I believe AND I was hoping you would go into the physics of it :p - 14/02/2012 11:01:18 PM 1053 Views
here ya go, I still skipped almost all of the math though. - 15/02/2012 03:00:09 PM 1171 Views
Two things: *NM* - 16/02/2012 04:03:52 PM 635 Views

Reply to Message