Active Users:3426 Time:02/04/2026 11:09:47 AM
Re: The Bell Curve explained... Shannow Send a noteboard - 26/10/2012 01:57:18 PM
Because, (to use the simplest possible example), on a Bell Curve the strongest possible channeler will be exactly twice the strength of the average channeler[...]


That's actually not the case. There is no upper limit inherent in a bell curve, though there may of course be one in this particular case.

Hence the Bell Curve cannot apply to the modern day distribution of known channelers.


Ah, ok. Then I guess we agree.


Well, unless the Bell Curve is intersected by "zero" on the lower side, the problem would be that there must be room on the strength scale for equivalent outliers on both sides.

Meaning that if you have a freakishly strong channeler on the upper side that is 10 standard deviations above the mean, then there must be equal room on the lower side for a very weak channeler that is 10 standard deviations below the mean.

Meaning that the average channeler must fall exactly halfway between these two extremes, given the perfectly symmetrical Bell Curve that is being implied here.
This message last edited by Shannow on 26/10/2012 at 02:02:45 PM
Reply to message
Ch2 : Pevara & Androl and channeling implications - 24/10/2012 06:40:47 PM 3104 Views
Did Perva actually initiate the link or was it Androl? *NM* - 24/10/2012 07:02:15 PM 865 Views
Androl did. *NM* - 25/10/2012 05:10:31 AM 1066 Views
But didn't Nynaeve do it first at the cleansing? - 25/10/2012 12:43:15 PM 1369 Views
Pevara was thinking on very sketchy information. - 25/10/2012 08:56:20 PM 1423 Views
did he start the link? or just take it? - 27/10/2012 07:33:49 AM 1014 Views
I think it's slightly off - 28/10/2012 04:21:05 PM 1259 Views
Re: Ch2 : Pevara & Androl and channeling implications - 25/10/2012 05:13:43 AM 1587 Views
Re: Ch2 : Pevara & Androl and channeling implications - 25/10/2012 04:23:20 PM 1306 Views
Re: Ch2 : Pevara & Androl and channeling implications - 25/10/2012 09:52:03 PM 1364 Views
Travelling - 25/10/2012 08:56:41 AM 1347 Views
Yes that's a pet theory of mine - 25/10/2012 04:21:53 PM 1363 Views
Re: Yes that's a pet theory of mine - 25/10/2012 06:12:21 PM 1333 Views
Re: Yes that's a pet theory of mine - 25/10/2012 08:50:15 PM 1207 Views
Re: Yes that's a pet theory of mine - 25/10/2012 09:45:26 PM 1365 Views
Weren't there 150 or so at Maradon? *NM* - 26/10/2012 03:29:53 PM 767 Views
Re: Yes that's a pet theory of mine - 26/10/2012 08:49:58 PM 1433 Views
Perhaps, but if no on in the AoL could do it when mixed circles were common - 28/10/2012 04:22:20 PM 1137 Views
How strong Pevara is... - 25/10/2012 07:08:26 PM 1496 Views
I'm pretty sure Moiraine is closer to 30... - 25/10/2012 07:41:37 PM 1131 Views
Agreed - 25/10/2012 08:37:24 PM 1276 Views
So... the old story of ignore the bell curve, eh? - 26/10/2012 01:40:49 AM 1231 Views
No, I fully respect the bell curve - 26/10/2012 01:51:34 PM 1261 Views
That was disproved long ago... - 26/10/2012 01:36:24 AM 1297 Views
But Moiraine isn't 'exceptionally strong' - 26/10/2012 05:16:10 AM 1284 Views
Not particularly strong evidence for that last. - 26/10/2012 05:36:54 AM 1307 Views
But we know that it takes significantly more strength to maintain multiple weaves - 26/10/2012 08:14:58 AM 1239 Views
Not true - 27/10/2012 09:15:51 PM 1217 Views
Not accurate - 27/10/2012 09:31:05 PM 1145 Views
The Bell Curve explained... - 26/10/2012 10:27:34 AM 1215 Views
Re: The Bell Curve explained... - 26/10/2012 11:40:04 AM 1206 Views
Re: The Bell Curve explained... - 26/10/2012 12:32:01 PM 1127 Views
Re: The Bell Curve explained... - 26/10/2012 12:48:51 PM 1258 Views
Re: The Bell Curve explained... - 26/10/2012 01:07:39 PM 1224 Views
Re: The Bell Curve explained... - 26/10/2012 01:18:32 PM 1361 Views
Re: The Bell Curve explained... - 26/10/2012 01:57:18 PM 1293 Views
Re: The Bell Curve explained... - 28/10/2012 02:07:39 PM 1173 Views
Yet Sharina, Nynaeve etc exist, thus the BC is the same - 27/10/2012 09:39:58 PM 1434 Views
The curve is OBVIOUSLY the same... - 28/10/2012 01:50:37 AM 1068 Views
Re: The curve is OBVIOUSLY the same... - 28/10/2012 02:01:59 PM 1162 Views
You need to go read RJ's quotes: - 28/10/2012 02:41:49 PM 1266 Views
Re: You need to go read RJ's quotes: - 28/10/2012 05:39:12 PM 1083 Views
I need to come and save you from blatant fallacies being spouted by the loonies. - 28/10/2012 05:56:21 PM 1090 Views
This is like watching a train-wreck. - 29/10/2012 02:58:51 AM 1081 Views
Re: This is like watching a train-wreck. - 29/10/2012 01:10:35 PM 1286 Views
So what's your conclusion? - 29/10/2012 02:14:33 PM 1071 Views
His conclusion is that RJ was right about the books he wrote... - 29/10/2012 02:19:59 PM 1183 Views
Pretty much... - 30/10/2012 12:57:41 AM 1266 Views
Excellent points... - 29/10/2012 02:16:39 PM 1046 Views
Re: Excellent points... - 29/10/2012 02:47:30 PM 1253 Views
You seem confused. - 29/10/2012 03:22:47 PM 1034 Views
Re: You seem confused. - 29/10/2012 03:41:48 PM 1073 Views
I think the point is that the AS didn't go force every woman in the area - 29/10/2012 07:57:59 PM 1025 Views
Re: You seem confused. - 29/10/2012 08:23:22 PM 1268 Views
Re: You seem confused. - 29/10/2012 08:57:11 PM 1182 Views
He drew graphs! - 30/10/2012 12:49:09 AM 1083 Views
Re: He drew graphs! - 30/10/2012 07:43:54 AM 1229 Views
Re: He drew graphs! - 30/10/2012 01:57:05 PM 1126 Views
Re: Excellent points... - 30/10/2012 12:20:00 AM 1145 Views
Re: Excellent points... - 30/10/2012 07:49:57 AM 1122 Views
Re: Excellent points... - 30/10/2012 01:05:45 PM 1529 Views
Re: Excellent points... - 30/10/2012 01:25:11 PM 1162 Views
Re: Excellent points... - 30/10/2012 12:20:17 AM 1247 Views
AS recruiting is minimal - 28/10/2012 10:41:29 PM 1107 Views
Re: You need to go read RJ's quotes: - 29/10/2012 02:23:27 AM 1093 Views
Re: You need to go read RJ's quotes: - 29/10/2012 07:33:44 AM 1096 Views
Huh? - 29/10/2012 02:26:27 PM 1168 Views
Re: Huh? - 29/10/2012 02:42:07 PM 1060 Views
You don't seem to know what random means... - 29/10/2012 03:25:57 PM 1101 Views
Re: You don't seem to know what random means... - 29/10/2012 03:36:45 PM 1094 Views
Personally I just think that 1000 women being allowed to tag along is a drop - 29/10/2012 08:05:33 PM 1184 Views
Re: Personally I just think that 1000 women being allowed to tag along is a drop - 29/10/2012 09:04:02 PM 1219 Views
Geography alone can do this - 30/10/2012 12:39:53 AM 1085 Views
Re: Geography alone can do this - 30/10/2012 09:45:58 AM 1063 Views
Not really - 30/10/2012 02:49:05 PM 1049 Views
Here's why its not random... - 30/10/2012 01:04:18 AM 1064 Views
Re: Here's why its not random... - 30/10/2012 09:42:35 AM 1259 Views
Re: Here's why its not random... - 30/10/2012 01:51:03 PM 1047 Views
Re: Here's why its not random... - 30/10/2012 02:21:04 PM 1109 Views
YEah, there's no point debating this... - 30/10/2012 02:46:39 PM 1115 Views
Genetics plays a role - 30/10/2012 03:03:41 PM 1276 Views
Re: You don't seem to know what random means... - 29/10/2012 08:22:40 PM 1022 Views
Re: You don't seem to know what random means... - 29/10/2012 09:06:08 PM 1138 Views
Why must there be a mechanism? - 30/10/2012 01:06:29 AM 1064 Views
Re: Why must there be a mechanism? - 30/10/2012 09:48:16 AM 1064 Views
Nope... - 30/10/2012 01:43:56 PM 1222 Views
Re: Nope... - 30/10/2012 02:34:51 PM 1071 Views
Oh my... - 30/10/2012 02:50:12 PM 1099 Views
Thought experment time! Hurrah! - 30/10/2012 03:27:01 PM 1061 Views
But it is still possible in your example to get wildly varied results - 30/10/2012 03:30:59 PM 1007 Views
Re: But it is still possible in your example to get wildly varied results - 30/10/2012 03:36:03 PM 1080 Views
LOL - 30/10/2012 04:49:06 PM 1694 Views
Re: Yet Sharina, Nynaeve etc exist, thus the BC is the same - 28/10/2012 01:39:55 PM 1114 Views
The point is there are still people being born in the highest strength categories - 28/10/2012 04:18:55 PM 1156 Views
Re: The point is there are still people being born in the highest strength categories - 28/10/2012 05:21:44 PM 1084 Views
The curve hasn't shifted! - 28/10/2012 05:39:42 PM 1242 Views
The fact is, Moiraine is not half as strong as Lanfear, hence she is below average strength. - 28/10/2012 06:02:04 PM 1119 Views
How is this fact? - 29/10/2012 02:59:49 AM 1204 Views
Re: How is this fact? - 29/10/2012 07:04:15 PM 1107 Views
Not so - 29/10/2012 08:09:29 PM 1077 Views
Re: Not so - 29/10/2012 08:43:16 PM 1205 Views
Sure it is - 30/10/2012 01:43:39 AM 1141 Views
Explain Elza-Merise-Cadsuane then... - 29/10/2012 08:20:14 PM 1086 Views
Re: Explain Elza-Merise-Cadsuane then... - 29/10/2012 08:38:11 PM 1188 Views
Are you blind man? - 30/10/2012 01:12:26 AM 1108 Views
Re: Are you blind man? - 30/10/2012 09:23:37 AM 1133 Views
Cadsuane is just below Egwene... - 30/10/2012 01:37:54 PM 1070 Views
Your strength scores don't square with the Pevara quote - 30/10/2012 03:15:22 PM 1067 Views
Re: The curve hasn't shifted! - 28/10/2012 07:36:36 PM 1095 Views
On Raw strength scores I think you are pretty inline with my thinking - 27/10/2012 09:37:25 PM 1232 Views
And the facing a Foresaken comment is out of context anyway... - 28/10/2012 01:56:12 AM 1235 Views
Excellent point on raw v. Effective strength *NM* - 28/10/2012 04:13:21 PM 766 Views

Reply to Message