Active Users:2010 Time:24/10/2026 06:13:43 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
I hate to get into these things HousealThor Send a noteboard - 29/10/2012 05:45:50 PM
In any case, for those who aren’t aware, this thread is based on RJ’s statement that channeler strength in WoT can be represented by a Bell Curve distribution. For those unfamiliar with statistics, a Bell Curve is a perfectly normal distribution, peaking at the average and petering off to either side in a perfectly symmetrical manner.

A Bell Curve by definition means that the distance from the weakest to the strongest channeler is intersected at exactly the 50% mark by the mean (the average channeler). Any skewing of the distribution would mean that the term “Bell Curve” cannot be applied to the distribution. Instead, it would then be either a positively or negatively skewed distribution. But not a Bell Curve.

So the basic rule is that the average channeler has to be exactly half as strong as the strongest channeler. Or to put it differently, a channeler x standard deviations away from the mean on the weak side, must be exactly as far from the mean as a channeler x standard deviations away on the strong side.


And I don't really want to draw any conclusions about the channeling population, but your logic is completely off.

A simple illustration: Any normal distribution is a bell curve, regardless of its standard deviation. So take a normal distribution with a mean of 1 and a standard deviation of 4.1. That means that 9 lies within two standard deviations of the mean, and 1 clearly isn't 50% of 9.
Reply to message
The Bell Curve revisited Shannow - 29/10/2012 09:44:09 AM 1811 Views
Re: The Bell Curve revisited Tor - 29/10/2012 10:21:27 AM 1173 Views
That's incorrect... Shannow - 29/10/2012 10:26:49 AM 1742 Views
Re: That's incorrect... Tor - 29/10/2012 10:36:32 AM 1133 Views
Re: That's incorrect... Shannow - 29/10/2012 10:40:27 AM 976 Views
Re: That's incorrect... Tor - 29/10/2012 10:42:57 AM 961 Views
Hehe...There are a few disputing it vocally. Whether they're in their right mind, well... Shannow - 29/10/2012 10:45:07 AM 1077 Views
Re: Hehe...There are a few disputing it vocally. Whether they're in their right mind, well... Tor - 29/10/2012 10:49:49 AM 964 Views
Re: Hehe...There are a few disputing it vocally. Whether they're in their right mind, well... Shannow - 29/10/2012 10:56:37 AM 1048 Views
It's only as skewed as it seems when you make the assumption that the Forsaken darius_sedai - 31/10/2012 04:34:11 AM 1314 Views
RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right... fionwe1987 - 29/10/2012 02:11:19 PM 1075 Views
Response to a few of your poorly researched points... Shannow - 29/10/2012 02:31:17 PM 1018 Views
Re: RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right... Tor - 29/10/2012 02:37:33 PM 1000 Views
Exactly... Shannow - 29/10/2012 02:39:30 PM 1004 Views
there are dozens of reasons for this darius_sedai - 29/10/2012 08:18:18 PM 1027 Views
Excellent point. fionwe1987 - 29/10/2012 08:24:37 PM 1062 Views
Re: there are dozens of reasons for this Tor - 29/10/2012 09:07:35 PM 965 Views
Again I don't argue that genetics play no role darius_sedai - 30/10/2012 01:57:24 AM 957 Views
Re: Again I don't argue that genetics play no role Tor - 30/10/2012 07:07:17 AM 966 Views
I don't think it plays much role in the plot darius_sedai - 30/10/2012 03:17:55 PM 1146 Views
Once again just so,we are clear on my stance with Genetics and Strength darius_sedai - 30/10/2012 03:27:11 PM 955 Views
That the 1000 Novices aren't a random sample of the population? fionwe1987 - 29/10/2012 08:23:47 PM 897 Views
And why would it be biased towards those with lower strength? Tor - 29/10/2012 09:11:25 PM 921 Views
Absolutely no reason... fionwe1987 - 30/10/2012 01:35:35 AM 1017 Views
Re: Absolutely no reason... Tor - 30/10/2012 06:43:54 AM 930 Views
Only if it was a random sampling. Which this is not. fionwe1987 - 30/10/2012 01:58:34 PM 1019 Views
That's exactly the point. I want you to explain why it wasn't random. Tor - 30/10/2012 02:14:59 PM 944 Views
It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample! fionwe1987 - 30/10/2012 02:43:03 PM 933 Views
Re: It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample! Tor - 30/10/2012 02:47:30 PM 925 Views
Go read a stats text will you? fionwe1987 - 30/10/2012 02:54:16 PM 916 Views
Done Tor - 31/10/2012 09:34:11 AM 1723 Views
You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... fionwe1987 - 10/11/2012 10:14:19 PM 1226 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... Tor - 11/11/2012 11:37:16 AM 1045 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... fionwe1987 - 11/11/2012 07:14:48 PM 898 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... Tor - 11/11/2012 08:33:59 PM 1724 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... Tor - 11/11/2012 08:43:19 PM 1297 Views
Seriously? I went and looked at some statistics books, and you won't even reply? Tor - 01/11/2012 12:13:49 PM 1037 Views
Still nothing? Tor - 10/11/2012 03:33:15 PM 1061 Views
Still doesn't explain the difference Praziquantel - 30/10/2012 07:01:53 PM 879 Views
Re: Still doesn't explain the difference fionwe1987 - 10/11/2012 10:21:00 PM 960 Views
Yes that totally makes sense Sidious - 30/10/2012 08:07:16 AM 1042 Views
Thank you! *NM* Tor - 30/10/2012 10:19:15 AM 496 Views
That's not what happened... fionwe1987 - 30/10/2012 02:01:52 PM 1022 Views
Re: That's not what happened... Tor - 30/10/2012 02:15:57 PM 926 Views
Who said it would? fionwe1987 - 30/10/2012 02:44:17 PM 947 Views
let's not mix up "random" and "representative" darius_sedai - 30/10/2012 05:28:09 PM 1007 Views
Doesn't mean RJ applied it to his series Sidious - 30/10/2012 08:23:29 AM 1032 Views
But of course he did.. fionwe1987 - 30/10/2012 02:13:07 PM 1080 Views
I hate to get into these things HousealThor - 29/10/2012 05:45:50 PM 1107 Views
I would love for you to be right, because it would solve all our problems, but 0 is the challenge... Shannow - 29/10/2012 07:56:34 PM 1090 Views
In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed HousealThor - 29/10/2012 08:20:52 PM 1084 Views
Overwhelm Lanfear, not match her. *NM* fionwe1987 - 29/10/2012 08:26:09 PM 567 Views
Truth is, Moiraine was being overly optimistic... Shannow - 29/10/2012 08:39:17 PM 1018 Views
You're pathetic... fionwe1987 - 30/10/2012 01:20:01 AM 929 Views
The quote isn't specific Sidious - 30/10/2012 08:32:36 AM 1052 Views
Its highly specific... fionwe1987 - 30/10/2012 02:15:38 PM 875 Views
Yet neither of them are at full potential and at least equal a Forsaken darius_sedai - 30/10/2012 03:45:24 PM 1550 Views
Honestly! darius_sedai - 30/10/2012 02:07:37 AM 995 Views
Re: In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed Tor - 29/10/2012 09:10:27 PM 994 Views
Lots of people mean perfectly normal distribution when they say it HousealThor - 30/10/2012 05:25:35 PM 945 Views
Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame? TheCrownless - 30/10/2012 12:04:01 AM 1149 Views
Re: Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame? Tor - 30/10/2012 09:33:44 AM 1075 Views
Are you sure about that? TheCrownless - 30/10/2012 12:03:43 PM 1051 Views
Re: Are you sure about that? Tor - 30/10/2012 12:19:34 PM 967 Views
That doesn't seem a coherent narrative to me TheCrownless - 30/10/2012 04:26:25 PM 1303 Views
Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola darius_sedai - 30/10/2012 05:16:40 PM 1072 Views
Re: Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola TheCrownless - 30/10/2012 05:54:41 PM 938 Views
We do not know if Cadsuane or any of the Forsaken are Sparkers darius_sedai - 30/10/2012 10:33:55 PM 1111 Views
Re: We do not know if Cadsuane or any of the Forsaken are Sparkers TheCrownless - 31/10/2012 12:30:52 AM 1049 Views
A handful of examples are all we have and we have proof that an extremely strong Channeler darius_sedai - 31/10/2012 02:58:57 AM 920 Views
you're confusing 2 things Zaphod - 30/10/2012 04:27:32 AM 1237 Views
+1 *NM* Sidious - 30/10/2012 09:17:07 AM 1102 Views
Re: you're confusing 2 things Simon - 30/10/2012 09:21:39 AM 1098 Views
Not true... Shannow - 30/10/2012 11:49:57 AM 1064 Views
One thing HousealThor - 30/10/2012 05:23:17 PM 1030 Views
That's the problem. The BC RJ has "built" has a minimum and a maximum value darius_sedai - 30/10/2012 05:48:55 PM 1051 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes