Active Users:786 Time:04/06/2026 05:42:44 AM
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... Tor Send a noteboard - 11/11/2012 11:37:16 AM
This is not a thought experiment. It is a thoughtless experiment.


Strength in the power is essentially like a random number, handed out to potential channelers at birth. The value of that number, or even if you have one, isn't known until you get tested. So how is it different from my second example with the coins?

Also, I didn't say I expected the same number of heads and tails, but roughly the same number, which is very reasonable. I can explain the maths, if you like.

Finally, I'm going to hazard a guess. Are you by any chance an engineer?
Fram kamerater!
Reply to message
The Bell Curve revisited - 29/10/2012 09:44:09 AM 1731 Views
Re: The Bell Curve revisited - 29/10/2012 10:21:27 AM 1087 Views
That's incorrect... - 29/10/2012 10:26:49 AM 1666 Views
Re: That's incorrect... - 29/10/2012 10:36:32 AM 1057 Views
RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right... - 29/10/2012 02:11:19 PM 997 Views
Response to a few of your poorly researched points... - 29/10/2012 02:31:17 PM 943 Views
Re: RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right... - 29/10/2012 02:37:33 PM 929 Views
Exactly... - 29/10/2012 02:39:30 PM 923 Views
there are dozens of reasons for this - 29/10/2012 08:18:18 PM 945 Views
Excellent point. - 29/10/2012 08:24:37 PM 987 Views
Re: there are dozens of reasons for this - 29/10/2012 09:07:35 PM 907 Views
Again I don't argue that genetics play no role - 30/10/2012 01:57:24 AM 880 Views
Re: Again I don't argue that genetics play no role - 30/10/2012 07:07:17 AM 878 Views
I don't think it plays much role in the plot - 30/10/2012 03:17:55 PM 1043 Views
Once again just so,we are clear on my stance with Genetics and Strength - 30/10/2012 03:27:11 PM 898 Views
That the 1000 Novices aren't a random sample of the population? - 29/10/2012 08:23:47 PM 837 Views
And why would it be biased towards those with lower strength? - 29/10/2012 09:11:25 PM 855 Views
Absolutely no reason... - 30/10/2012 01:35:35 AM 943 Views
Re: Absolutely no reason... - 30/10/2012 06:43:54 AM 847 Views
Only if it was a random sampling. Which this is not. - 30/10/2012 01:58:34 PM 946 Views
That's exactly the point. I want you to explain why it wasn't random. - 30/10/2012 02:14:59 PM 870 Views
It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample! - 30/10/2012 02:43:03 PM 872 Views
Re: It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample! - 30/10/2012 02:47:30 PM 864 Views
Go read a stats text will you? - 30/10/2012 02:54:16 PM 853 Views
Done - 31/10/2012 09:34:11 AM 1634 Views
You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 10/11/2012 10:14:19 PM 1155 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 11:37:16 AM 974 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 07:14:48 PM 830 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 08:33:59 PM 1639 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 08:43:19 PM 1215 Views
Still nothing? - 10/11/2012 03:33:15 PM 992 Views
Still doesn't explain the difference - 30/10/2012 07:01:53 PM 808 Views
Re: Still doesn't explain the difference - 10/11/2012 10:21:00 PM 895 Views
Yes that totally makes sense - 30/10/2012 08:07:16 AM 985 Views
Thank you! *NM* - 30/10/2012 10:19:15 AM 454 Views
That's not what happened... - 30/10/2012 02:01:52 PM 951 Views
Re: That's not what happened... - 30/10/2012 02:15:57 PM 858 Views
Who said it would? - 30/10/2012 02:44:17 PM 886 Views
let's not mix up "random" and "representative" - 30/10/2012 05:28:09 PM 933 Views
Doesn't mean RJ applied it to his series - 30/10/2012 08:23:29 AM 950 Views
But of course he did.. - 30/10/2012 02:13:07 PM 997 Views
I hate to get into these things - 29/10/2012 05:45:50 PM 1025 Views
I would love for you to be right, because it would solve all our problems, but 0 is the challenge... - 29/10/2012 07:56:34 PM 1020 Views
In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed - 29/10/2012 08:20:52 PM 1002 Views
Overwhelm Lanfear, not match her. *NM* - 29/10/2012 08:26:09 PM 527 Views
Truth is, Moiraine was being overly optimistic... - 29/10/2012 08:39:17 PM 919 Views
You're pathetic... - 30/10/2012 01:20:01 AM 856 Views
The quote isn't specific - 30/10/2012 08:32:36 AM 967 Views
Its highly specific... - 30/10/2012 02:15:38 PM 817 Views
Yet neither of them are at full potential and at least equal a Forsaken - 30/10/2012 03:45:24 PM 1474 Views
Honestly! - 30/10/2012 02:07:37 AM 908 Views
Re: In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed - 29/10/2012 09:10:27 PM 925 Views
Lots of people mean perfectly normal distribution when they say it - 30/10/2012 05:25:35 PM 865 Views
Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame? - 30/10/2012 12:04:01 AM 1060 Views
Re: Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame? - 30/10/2012 09:33:44 AM 985 Views
Are you sure about that? - 30/10/2012 12:03:43 PM 978 Views
Re: Are you sure about that? - 30/10/2012 12:19:34 PM 886 Views
That doesn't seem a coherent narrative to me - 30/10/2012 04:26:25 PM 1225 Views
Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola - 30/10/2012 05:16:40 PM 995 Views
Re: Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola - 30/10/2012 05:54:41 PM 870 Views
We do not know if Cadsuane or any of the Forsaken are Sparkers - 30/10/2012 10:33:55 PM 1012 Views
you're confusing 2 things - 30/10/2012 04:27:32 AM 1153 Views
+1 *NM* - 30/10/2012 09:17:07 AM 1023 Views
Re: you're confusing 2 things - 30/10/2012 09:21:39 AM 1011 Views
Not true... - 30/10/2012 11:49:57 AM 977 Views
One thing - 30/10/2012 05:23:17 PM 952 Views
That's the problem. The BC RJ has "built" has a minimum and a maximum value - 30/10/2012 05:48:55 PM 971 Views

Reply to Message