This validates my point (which you have completely disagreed with before) that Aes Sedai make a terrible random sampling. They're a very skewed sample, and the best example of that is the 1000 novices Egwene's proclamation brings.
RJ said that 62.5% of women were strong enough to become Aes Sedai, yet only 20% of Egwene's 1000 novices are strong enough. What possible explanation could there be for this enormous bias?
Even if Aes Sedai only pick up a small percentage of all potential channelers, there is still no logical reason under the sun why this small sample should be so biased towards the weaker side of the Mean.
The sample should still represent the distribution of the larger population it was drawn from.
The Bell Curve revisited
- 29/10/2012 09:44:09 AM
1784 Views
Re: The Bell Curve revisited
- 29/10/2012 10:21:27 AM
1136 Views
That's incorrect...
- 29/10/2012 10:26:49 AM
1709 Views
Re: That's incorrect...
- 29/10/2012 10:36:32 AM
1106 Views
Re: That's incorrect...
- 29/10/2012 10:40:27 AM
955 Views
Re: That's incorrect...
- 29/10/2012 10:42:57 AM
940 Views
Hehe...There are a few disputing it vocally. Whether they're in their right mind, well...
- 29/10/2012 10:45:07 AM
1059 Views
Re: Hehe...There are a few disputing it vocally. Whether they're in their right mind, well...
- 29/10/2012 10:49:49 AM
933 Views
Re: Hehe...There are a few disputing it vocally. Whether they're in their right mind, well...
- 29/10/2012 10:56:37 AM
1029 Views
It's only as skewed as it seems when you make the assumption that the Forsaken
- 31/10/2012 04:34:11 AM
1282 Views
RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right...
- 29/10/2012 02:11:19 PM
1050 Views
Re: RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right...
- 29/10/2012 02:37:33 PM
978 Views
Exactly...
- 29/10/2012 02:39:30 PM
974 Views
there are dozens of reasons for this
- 29/10/2012 08:18:18 PM
1000 Views
Re: there are dozens of reasons for this
- 29/10/2012 09:07:35 PM
947 Views
Again I don't argue that genetics play no role
- 30/10/2012 01:57:24 AM
934 Views
Once again just so,we are clear on my stance with Genetics and Strength
- 30/10/2012 03:27:11 PM
932 Views
That the 1000 Novices aren't a random sample of the population?
- 29/10/2012 08:23:47 PM
878 Views
And why would it be biased towards those with lower strength?
- 29/10/2012 09:11:25 PM
900 Views
Absolutely no reason...
- 30/10/2012 01:35:35 AM
984 Views
Re: Absolutely no reason...
- 30/10/2012 06:43:54 AM
904 Views
Only if it was a random sampling. Which this is not.
- 30/10/2012 01:58:34 PM
993 Views
That's exactly the point. I want you to explain why it wasn't random.
- 30/10/2012 02:14:59 PM
916 Views
It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample!
- 30/10/2012 02:43:03 PM
919 Views
Re: It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample!
- 30/10/2012 02:47:30 PM
909 Views
Go read a stats text will you?
- 30/10/2012 02:54:16 PM
897 Views
Done
- 31/10/2012 09:34:11 AM
1697 Views
You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent...
- 10/11/2012 10:14:19 PM
1208 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent...
- 11/11/2012 11:37:16 AM
1024 Views
Seriously? I went and looked at some statistics books, and you won't even reply?
- 01/11/2012 12:13:49 PM
1015 Views
Yes that totally makes sense
- 30/10/2012 08:07:16 AM
1023 Views
- 30/10/2012 08:07:16 AM
1023 Views
That's not what happened...
- 30/10/2012 02:01:52 PM
997 Views
I hate to get into these things
- 29/10/2012 05:45:50 PM
1079 Views
I would love for you to be right, because it would solve all our problems, but 0 is the challenge...
- 29/10/2012 07:56:34 PM
1068 Views
In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed
- 29/10/2012 08:20:52 PM
1057 Views
Overwhelm Lanfear, not match her. *NM*
- 29/10/2012 08:26:09 PM
554 Views
Truth is, Moiraine was being overly optimistic...
- 29/10/2012 08:39:17 PM
978 Views
You're pathetic...
- 30/10/2012 01:20:01 AM
900 Views
The quote isn't specific
- 30/10/2012 08:32:36 AM
1010 Views
Yet neither of them are at full potential and at least equal a Forsaken
- 30/10/2012 03:45:24 PM
1520 Views
Re: In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed
- 29/10/2012 09:10:27 PM
974 Views
Lots of people mean perfectly normal distribution when they say it
- 30/10/2012 05:25:35 PM
912 Views
Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame?
- 30/10/2012 12:04:01 AM
1113 Views
Re: Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame?
- 30/10/2012 09:33:44 AM
1037 Views
Are you sure about that?
- 30/10/2012 12:03:43 PM
1034 Views
Re: Are you sure about that?
- 30/10/2012 12:19:34 PM
934 Views
That doesn't seem a coherent narrative to me
- 30/10/2012 04:26:25 PM
1279 Views
Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola
- 30/10/2012 05:16:40 PM
1050 Views
Re: Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola
- 30/10/2012 05:54:41 PM
920 Views
We do not know if Cadsuane or any of the Forsaken are Sparkers
- 30/10/2012 10:33:55 PM
1083 Views
Re: We do not know if Cadsuane or any of the Forsaken are Sparkers
- 31/10/2012 12:30:52 AM
1026 Views
A handful of examples are all we have and we have proof that an extremely strong Channeler
- 31/10/2012 02:58:57 AM
901 Views
you're confusing 2 things
- 30/10/2012 04:27:32 AM
1210 Views
One thing
- 30/10/2012 05:23:17 PM
1007 Views
That's the problem. The BC RJ has "built" has a minimum and a maximum value
- 30/10/2012 05:48:55 PM
1023 Views
