Active Users:665 Time:04/06/2026 04:37:00 AM
Re: there are dozens of reasons for this Tor Send a noteboard - 29/10/2012 09:07:35 PM
Look at the TR for instance. We've seen many more uber-channelers come from that tiny region and a much higher % that would be expected from such a small region. Dozens of men and women have been picked up by both Towers from the TR and they are ALL strong enough to be AS.

You are both trying to apply a total population % to isolated regional variations and tiny populations of the overall channeling pool.


Again, 1000 is not a tiny sample, and, also again, aren't you now saying that genetics is relevant to sampling strength? What other explanation could there be for regional variations?
Fram kamerater!
Reply to message
The Bell Curve revisited - 29/10/2012 09:44:09 AM 1730 Views
Re: The Bell Curve revisited - 29/10/2012 10:21:27 AM 1086 Views
That's incorrect... - 29/10/2012 10:26:49 AM 1666 Views
Re: That's incorrect... - 29/10/2012 10:36:32 AM 1057 Views
RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right... - 29/10/2012 02:11:19 PM 997 Views
Response to a few of your poorly researched points... - 29/10/2012 02:31:17 PM 943 Views
Re: RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right... - 29/10/2012 02:37:33 PM 929 Views
Exactly... - 29/10/2012 02:39:30 PM 922 Views
there are dozens of reasons for this - 29/10/2012 08:18:18 PM 945 Views
Excellent point. - 29/10/2012 08:24:37 PM 987 Views
Re: there are dozens of reasons for this - 29/10/2012 09:07:35 PM 907 Views
Again I don't argue that genetics play no role - 30/10/2012 01:57:24 AM 878 Views
Re: Again I don't argue that genetics play no role - 30/10/2012 07:07:17 AM 876 Views
I don't think it plays much role in the plot - 30/10/2012 03:17:55 PM 1042 Views
Once again just so,we are clear on my stance with Genetics and Strength - 30/10/2012 03:27:11 PM 896 Views
That the 1000 Novices aren't a random sample of the population? - 29/10/2012 08:23:47 PM 837 Views
And why would it be biased towards those with lower strength? - 29/10/2012 09:11:25 PM 854 Views
Absolutely no reason... - 30/10/2012 01:35:35 AM 942 Views
Re: Absolutely no reason... - 30/10/2012 06:43:54 AM 846 Views
Only if it was a random sampling. Which this is not. - 30/10/2012 01:58:34 PM 944 Views
That's exactly the point. I want you to explain why it wasn't random. - 30/10/2012 02:14:59 PM 870 Views
It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample! - 30/10/2012 02:43:03 PM 870 Views
Re: It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample! - 30/10/2012 02:47:30 PM 863 Views
Go read a stats text will you? - 30/10/2012 02:54:16 PM 852 Views
Done - 31/10/2012 09:34:11 AM 1633 Views
You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 10/11/2012 10:14:19 PM 1154 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 11:37:16 AM 972 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 07:14:48 PM 830 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 08:33:59 PM 1639 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 08:43:19 PM 1214 Views
Still nothing? - 10/11/2012 03:33:15 PM 990 Views
Still doesn't explain the difference - 30/10/2012 07:01:53 PM 808 Views
Re: Still doesn't explain the difference - 10/11/2012 10:21:00 PM 895 Views
Yes that totally makes sense - 30/10/2012 08:07:16 AM 984 Views
Thank you! *NM* - 30/10/2012 10:19:15 AM 454 Views
That's not what happened... - 30/10/2012 02:01:52 PM 951 Views
Re: That's not what happened... - 30/10/2012 02:15:57 PM 857 Views
Who said it would? - 30/10/2012 02:44:17 PM 886 Views
let's not mix up "random" and "representative" - 30/10/2012 05:28:09 PM 932 Views
Doesn't mean RJ applied it to his series - 30/10/2012 08:23:29 AM 949 Views
But of course he did.. - 30/10/2012 02:13:07 PM 996 Views
I hate to get into these things - 29/10/2012 05:45:50 PM 1025 Views
I would love for you to be right, because it would solve all our problems, but 0 is the challenge... - 29/10/2012 07:56:34 PM 1020 Views
In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed - 29/10/2012 08:20:52 PM 1001 Views
Overwhelm Lanfear, not match her. *NM* - 29/10/2012 08:26:09 PM 527 Views
Truth is, Moiraine was being overly optimistic... - 29/10/2012 08:39:17 PM 919 Views
You're pathetic... - 30/10/2012 01:20:01 AM 856 Views
The quote isn't specific - 30/10/2012 08:32:36 AM 967 Views
Its highly specific... - 30/10/2012 02:15:38 PM 816 Views
Yet neither of them are at full potential and at least equal a Forsaken - 30/10/2012 03:45:24 PM 1472 Views
Honestly! - 30/10/2012 02:07:37 AM 907 Views
Re: In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed - 29/10/2012 09:10:27 PM 923 Views
Lots of people mean perfectly normal distribution when they say it - 30/10/2012 05:25:35 PM 863 Views
Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame? - 30/10/2012 12:04:01 AM 1058 Views
Re: Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame? - 30/10/2012 09:33:44 AM 984 Views
Are you sure about that? - 30/10/2012 12:03:43 PM 977 Views
Re: Are you sure about that? - 30/10/2012 12:19:34 PM 885 Views
That doesn't seem a coherent narrative to me - 30/10/2012 04:26:25 PM 1225 Views
Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola - 30/10/2012 05:16:40 PM 995 Views
Re: Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola - 30/10/2012 05:54:41 PM 870 Views
We do not know if Cadsuane or any of the Forsaken are Sparkers - 30/10/2012 10:33:55 PM 1010 Views
you're confusing 2 things - 30/10/2012 04:27:32 AM 1153 Views
+1 *NM* - 30/10/2012 09:17:07 AM 1022 Views
Re: you're confusing 2 things - 30/10/2012 09:21:39 AM 1010 Views
Not true... - 30/10/2012 11:49:57 AM 975 Views
One thing - 30/10/2012 05:23:17 PM 952 Views
That's the problem. The BC RJ has "built" has a minimum and a maximum value - 30/10/2012 05:48:55 PM 969 Views

Reply to Message