Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame?
TheCrownless Send a noteboard - 30/10/2012 12:04:01 AM
I was always under the impression that they relied on people who came to the tower, they did very little active recruitment and relied on people coming to the Tower, very few of these will be wilders (who are supposed to be stronger?). That way most modern Aes Sedai representation is below what would be "average".
I don't agree about the circle maths though, I always got the impression being in a circle allowed you to do things you couldn't do as 3 individuals but your combined "power" wasn't that of a single channeler who had the combined strength of the 3 in the circle.
As has been pointed out though, your assertion that the highest is exactly twice as powerful as the middle is wrong though, bell curves by their nature don't allow that kind of detail. It's very possible Rand is an outlier many standard deviations of the mean away from the mean. I imagine in actuality he's rather closer than that but it's worth noting for the calculations as it's impossible for the population to actually be a bell curve.
I don't agree about the circle maths though, I always got the impression being in a circle allowed you to do things you couldn't do as 3 individuals but your combined "power" wasn't that of a single channeler who had the combined strength of the 3 in the circle.
As has been pointed out though, your assertion that the highest is exactly twice as powerful as the middle is wrong though, bell curves by their nature don't allow that kind of detail. It's very possible Rand is an outlier many standard deviations of the mean away from the mean. I imagine in actuality he's rather closer than that but it's worth noting for the calculations as it's impossible for the population to actually be a bell curve.
Come to the dark side, We have candy!
I'm Israel, he's Palestine, its more fun when you pick sides.
I'm Israel, he's Palestine, its more fun when you pick sides.
This message last edited by TheCrownless on 30/10/2012 at 12:12:51 AM
The Bell Curve revisited
- 29/10/2012 09:44:09 AM
1698 Views
Re: The Bell Curve revisited
- 29/10/2012 10:21:27 AM
1057 Views
That's incorrect...
- 29/10/2012 10:26:49 AM
1637 Views
Re: That's incorrect...
- 29/10/2012 10:36:32 AM
1021 Views
Re: That's incorrect...
- 29/10/2012 10:40:27 AM
881 Views
Re: That's incorrect...
- 29/10/2012 10:42:57 AM
869 Views
Hehe...There are a few disputing it vocally. Whether they're in their right mind, well...
- 29/10/2012 10:45:07 AM
975 Views
Re: Hehe...There are a few disputing it vocally. Whether they're in their right mind, well...
- 29/10/2012 10:49:49 AM
861 Views
Re: Hehe...There are a few disputing it vocally. Whether they're in their right mind, well...
- 29/10/2012 10:56:37 AM
950 Views
It's only as skewed as it seems when you make the assumption that the Forsaken
- 31/10/2012 04:34:11 AM
1203 Views
RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right...
- 29/10/2012 02:11:19 PM
963 Views
Re: RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right...
- 29/10/2012 02:37:33 PM
902 Views
there are dozens of reasons for this
- 29/10/2012 08:18:18 PM
920 Views
Re: there are dozens of reasons for this
- 29/10/2012 09:07:35 PM
867 Views
Again I don't argue that genetics play no role
- 30/10/2012 01:57:24 AM
852 Views
Once again just so,we are clear on my stance with Genetics and Strength
- 30/10/2012 03:27:11 PM
861 Views
That the 1000 Novices aren't a random sample of the population?
- 29/10/2012 08:23:47 PM
808 Views
And why would it be biased towards those with lower strength?
- 29/10/2012 09:11:25 PM
823 Views
Absolutely no reason...
- 30/10/2012 01:35:35 AM
918 Views
Re: Absolutely no reason...
- 30/10/2012 06:43:54 AM
819 Views
Only if it was a random sampling. Which this is not.
- 30/10/2012 01:58:34 PM
915 Views
That's exactly the point. I want you to explain why it wasn't random.
- 30/10/2012 02:14:59 PM
840 Views
It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample!
- 30/10/2012 02:43:03 PM
838 Views
Re: It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample!
- 30/10/2012 02:47:30 PM
836 Views
Go read a stats text will you?
- 30/10/2012 02:54:16 PM
826 Views
Done
- 31/10/2012 09:34:11 AM
1605 Views
You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent...
- 10/11/2012 10:14:19 PM
1120 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent...
- 11/11/2012 11:37:16 AM
941 Views
Seriously? I went and looked at some statistics books, and you won't even reply?
- 01/11/2012 12:13:49 PM
938 Views
Yes that totally makes sense
- 30/10/2012 08:07:16 AM
956 Views
- 30/10/2012 08:07:16 AM
956 Views
That's not what happened...
- 30/10/2012 02:01:52 PM
901 Views
I hate to get into these things
- 29/10/2012 05:45:50 PM
986 Views
I would love for you to be right, because it would solve all our problems, but 0 is the challenge...
- 29/10/2012 07:56:34 PM
986 Views
In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed
- 29/10/2012 08:20:52 PM
980 Views
Overwhelm Lanfear, not match her. *NM*
- 29/10/2012 08:26:09 PM
511 Views
Truth is, Moiraine was being overly optimistic...
- 29/10/2012 08:39:17 PM
889 Views
You're pathetic...
- 30/10/2012 01:20:01 AM
826 Views
The quote isn't specific
- 30/10/2012 08:32:36 AM
936 Views
Yet neither of them are at full potential and at least equal a Forsaken
- 30/10/2012 03:45:24 PM
1437 Views
Re: In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed
- 29/10/2012 09:10:27 PM
888 Views
Lots of people mean perfectly normal distribution when they say it
- 30/10/2012 05:25:35 PM
836 Views
Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame?
- 30/10/2012 12:04:01 AM
1025 Views
Re: Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame?
- 30/10/2012 09:33:44 AM
949 Views
Are you sure about that?
- 30/10/2012 12:03:43 PM
945 Views
Re: Are you sure about that?
- 30/10/2012 12:19:34 PM
857 Views
That doesn't seem a coherent narrative to me
- 30/10/2012 04:26:25 PM
1195 Views
Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola
- 30/10/2012 05:16:40 PM
964 Views
Re: Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola
- 30/10/2012 05:54:41 PM
837 Views
We do not know if Cadsuane or any of the Forsaken are Sparkers
- 30/10/2012 10:33:55 PM
978 Views
Re: We do not know if Cadsuane or any of the Forsaken are Sparkers
- 31/10/2012 12:30:52 AM
930 Views
A handful of examples are all we have and we have proof that an extremely strong Channeler
- 31/10/2012 02:58:57 AM
822 Views
you're confusing 2 things
- 30/10/2012 04:27:32 AM
1120 Views
One thing
- 30/10/2012 05:23:17 PM
927 Views
That's the problem. The BC RJ has "built" has a minimum and a maximum value
- 30/10/2012 05:48:55 PM
940 Views
