Active Users:2448 Time:24/10/2026 07:16:48 PM
Overwhelm Lanfear, not match her. *NM* fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 29/10/2012 08:26:09 PM
Because of the fact that it doesn't seem possible to have negative strength in the OP. I don't know if RJ realized that a normal distribution would mean negative strength is possible, though.

The more I think about it, the more I think it has to be skewed. It's the only way Egwene and Aviendha can both be above the overall population mean given the quote about both of them together matching Lanfear.

And now, I've spent about 3x as much time thinking about this as I had wanted to :<img class=' />
Reply to message
The Bell Curve revisited - 29/10/2012 09:44:09 AM 1811 Views
Re: The Bell Curve revisited - 29/10/2012 10:21:27 AM 1173 Views
That's incorrect... - 29/10/2012 10:26:49 AM 1742 Views
Re: That's incorrect... - 29/10/2012 10:36:32 AM 1133 Views
RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right... - 29/10/2012 02:11:19 PM 1076 Views
Response to a few of your poorly researched points... - 29/10/2012 02:31:17 PM 1018 Views
Re: RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right... - 29/10/2012 02:37:33 PM 1001 Views
Exactly... - 29/10/2012 02:39:30 PM 1004 Views
there are dozens of reasons for this - 29/10/2012 08:18:18 PM 1028 Views
Excellent point. - 29/10/2012 08:24:37 PM 1062 Views
Re: there are dozens of reasons for this - 29/10/2012 09:07:35 PM 965 Views
Again I don't argue that genetics play no role - 30/10/2012 01:57:24 AM 957 Views
Re: Again I don't argue that genetics play no role - 30/10/2012 07:07:17 AM 966 Views
I don't think it plays much role in the plot - 30/10/2012 03:17:55 PM 1146 Views
Once again just so,we are clear on my stance with Genetics and Strength - 30/10/2012 03:27:11 PM 955 Views
That the 1000 Novices aren't a random sample of the population? - 29/10/2012 08:23:47 PM 897 Views
And why would it be biased towards those with lower strength? - 29/10/2012 09:11:25 PM 921 Views
Absolutely no reason... - 30/10/2012 01:35:35 AM 1017 Views
Re: Absolutely no reason... - 30/10/2012 06:43:54 AM 930 Views
Only if it was a random sampling. Which this is not. - 30/10/2012 01:58:34 PM 1019 Views
That's exactly the point. I want you to explain why it wasn't random. - 30/10/2012 02:14:59 PM 944 Views
It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample! - 30/10/2012 02:43:03 PM 933 Views
Re: It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample! - 30/10/2012 02:47:30 PM 925 Views
Go read a stats text will you? - 30/10/2012 02:54:16 PM 916 Views
Done - 31/10/2012 09:34:11 AM 1723 Views
You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 10/11/2012 10:14:19 PM 1226 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 11:37:16 AM 1045 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 07:14:48 PM 898 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 08:33:59 PM 1724 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 08:43:19 PM 1298 Views
Still nothing? - 10/11/2012 03:33:15 PM 1061 Views
Still doesn't explain the difference - 30/10/2012 07:01:53 PM 880 Views
Re: Still doesn't explain the difference - 10/11/2012 10:21:00 PM 960 Views
Yes that totally makes sense - 30/10/2012 08:07:16 AM 1042 Views
Thank you! *NM* - 30/10/2012 10:19:15 AM 496 Views
That's not what happened... - 30/10/2012 02:01:52 PM 1022 Views
Re: That's not what happened... - 30/10/2012 02:15:57 PM 926 Views
Who said it would? - 30/10/2012 02:44:17 PM 947 Views
let's not mix up "random" and "representative" - 30/10/2012 05:28:09 PM 1007 Views
Doesn't mean RJ applied it to his series - 30/10/2012 08:23:29 AM 1032 Views
But of course he did.. - 30/10/2012 02:13:07 PM 1080 Views
I hate to get into these things - 29/10/2012 05:45:50 PM 1107 Views
I would love for you to be right, because it would solve all our problems, but 0 is the challenge... - 29/10/2012 07:56:34 PM 1091 Views
In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed - 29/10/2012 08:20:52 PM 1085 Views
Overwhelm Lanfear, not match her. *NM* - 29/10/2012 08:26:09 PM 568 Views
Truth is, Moiraine was being overly optimistic... - 29/10/2012 08:39:17 PM 1018 Views
You're pathetic... - 30/10/2012 01:20:01 AM 929 Views
The quote isn't specific - 30/10/2012 08:32:36 AM 1052 Views
Its highly specific... - 30/10/2012 02:15:38 PM 875 Views
Yet neither of them are at full potential and at least equal a Forsaken - 30/10/2012 03:45:24 PM 1550 Views
Honestly! - 30/10/2012 02:07:37 AM 995 Views
Re: In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed - 29/10/2012 09:10:27 PM 994 Views
Lots of people mean perfectly normal distribution when they say it - 30/10/2012 05:25:35 PM 946 Views
Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame? - 30/10/2012 12:04:01 AM 1149 Views
Re: Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame? - 30/10/2012 09:33:44 AM 1075 Views
Are you sure about that? - 30/10/2012 12:03:43 PM 1051 Views
Re: Are you sure about that? - 30/10/2012 12:19:34 PM 967 Views
That doesn't seem a coherent narrative to me - 30/10/2012 04:26:25 PM 1303 Views
Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola - 30/10/2012 05:16:40 PM 1072 Views
Re: Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola - 30/10/2012 05:54:41 PM 939 Views
We do not know if Cadsuane or any of the Forsaken are Sparkers - 30/10/2012 10:33:55 PM 1111 Views
you're confusing 2 things - 30/10/2012 04:27:32 AM 1238 Views
+1 *NM* - 30/10/2012 09:17:07 AM 1102 Views
Re: you're confusing 2 things - 30/10/2012 09:21:39 AM 1098 Views
Not true... - 30/10/2012 11:49:57 AM 1064 Views
One thing - 30/10/2012 05:23:17 PM 1031 Views
That's the problem. The BC RJ has "built" has a minimum and a maximum value - 30/10/2012 05:48:55 PM 1051 Views

Reply to Message