Active Users:2045 Time:22/07/2026 06:46:55 AM
You're pathetic... fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 30/10/2012 01:20:01 AM
In truth, Aviendha and Egwene together would not exceed Lanfear's strength. That was Moiraine's desperate hope, but we see that just one book previously, Egwene plus Elayne - who equals Aviendha in strength - could not even come close to matching an undeveloped Rand, who is not yet equal to Lanfear in strength.

This is terribly amusing. One minute Moiraine's quote is the lynchpin of your theory. Then when the actual quote comes out totally rubbishing your theory, it is suddenly a desperate hope. Pathetic.

As for Rand... are you effing kidding me? He shielded them before they could do anything. They weren't even embracing the source when he did it!

Therefore the reality is that at the time of FoH Egwene and Aviendha combined would have no hope of matching Lanfear's raw strength.

Yes. Reality. Of course. Ignore everything that points the other way.
Reply to message
The Bell Curve revisited - 29/10/2012 09:44:09 AM 1759 Views
Re: The Bell Curve revisited - 29/10/2012 10:21:27 AM 1109 Views
That's incorrect... - 29/10/2012 10:26:49 AM 1687 Views
Re: That's incorrect... - 29/10/2012 10:36:32 AM 1085 Views
RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right... - 29/10/2012 02:11:19 PM 1026 Views
Response to a few of your poorly researched points... - 29/10/2012 02:31:17 PM 975 Views
Re: RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right... - 29/10/2012 02:37:33 PM 959 Views
Exactly... - 29/10/2012 02:39:30 PM 952 Views
there are dozens of reasons for this - 29/10/2012 08:18:18 PM 974 Views
Excellent point. - 29/10/2012 08:24:37 PM 1010 Views
Re: there are dozens of reasons for this - 29/10/2012 09:07:35 PM 925 Views
Again I don't argue that genetics play no role - 30/10/2012 01:57:24 AM 907 Views
Re: Again I don't argue that genetics play no role - 30/10/2012 07:07:17 AM 914 Views
I don't think it plays much role in the plot - 30/10/2012 03:17:55 PM 1071 Views
Once again just so,we are clear on my stance with Genetics and Strength - 30/10/2012 03:27:11 PM 915 Views
That the 1000 Novices aren't a random sample of the population? - 29/10/2012 08:23:47 PM 860 Views
And why would it be biased towards those with lower strength? - 29/10/2012 09:11:25 PM 880 Views
Absolutely no reason... - 30/10/2012 01:35:35 AM 964 Views
Re: Absolutely no reason... - 30/10/2012 06:43:54 AM 881 Views
Only if it was a random sampling. Which this is not. - 30/10/2012 01:58:34 PM 973 Views
That's exactly the point. I want you to explain why it wasn't random. - 30/10/2012 02:14:59 PM 896 Views
It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample! - 30/10/2012 02:43:03 PM 900 Views
Re: It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample! - 30/10/2012 02:47:30 PM 890 Views
Go read a stats text will you? - 30/10/2012 02:54:16 PM 877 Views
Done - 31/10/2012 09:34:11 AM 1670 Views
You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 10/11/2012 10:14:19 PM 1181 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 11:37:16 AM 999 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 07:14:48 PM 850 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 08:33:59 PM 1663 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 08:43:19 PM 1250 Views
Still nothing? - 10/11/2012 03:33:15 PM 1016 Views
Still doesn't explain the difference - 30/10/2012 07:01:53 PM 830 Views
Re: Still doesn't explain the difference - 10/11/2012 10:21:00 PM 924 Views
Yes that totally makes sense - 30/10/2012 08:07:16 AM 1004 Views
Thank you! *NM* - 30/10/2012 10:19:15 AM 473 Views
That's not what happened... - 30/10/2012 02:01:52 PM 981 Views
Re: That's not what happened... - 30/10/2012 02:15:57 PM 885 Views
Who said it would? - 30/10/2012 02:44:17 PM 907 Views
let's not mix up "random" and "representative" - 30/10/2012 05:28:09 PM 960 Views
Doesn't mean RJ applied it to his series - 30/10/2012 08:23:29 AM 977 Views
But of course he did.. - 30/10/2012 02:13:07 PM 1029 Views
I hate to get into these things - 29/10/2012 05:45:50 PM 1053 Views
I would love for you to be right, because it would solve all our problems, but 0 is the challenge... - 29/10/2012 07:56:34 PM 1049 Views
In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed - 29/10/2012 08:20:52 PM 1033 Views
Overwhelm Lanfear, not match her. *NM* - 29/10/2012 08:26:09 PM 542 Views
Truth is, Moiraine was being overly optimistic... - 29/10/2012 08:39:17 PM 950 Views
You're pathetic... - 30/10/2012 01:20:01 AM 882 Views
The quote isn't specific - 30/10/2012 08:32:36 AM 989 Views
Its highly specific... - 30/10/2012 02:15:38 PM 838 Views
Yet neither of them are at full potential and at least equal a Forsaken - 30/10/2012 03:45:24 PM 1497 Views
Honestly! - 30/10/2012 02:07:37 AM 936 Views
Re: In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed - 29/10/2012 09:10:27 PM 952 Views
Lots of people mean perfectly normal distribution when they say it - 30/10/2012 05:25:35 PM 891 Views
Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame? - 30/10/2012 12:04:01 AM 1086 Views
Re: Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame? - 30/10/2012 09:33:44 AM 1011 Views
Are you sure about that? - 30/10/2012 12:03:43 PM 1009 Views
Re: Are you sure about that? - 30/10/2012 12:19:34 PM 909 Views
That doesn't seem a coherent narrative to me - 30/10/2012 04:26:25 PM 1258 Views
Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola - 30/10/2012 05:16:40 PM 1028 Views
Re: Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola - 30/10/2012 05:54:41 PM 897 Views
We do not know if Cadsuane or any of the Forsaken are Sparkers - 30/10/2012 10:33:55 PM 1059 Views
you're confusing 2 things - 30/10/2012 04:27:32 AM 1184 Views
+1 *NM* - 30/10/2012 09:17:07 AM 1056 Views
Re: you're confusing 2 things - 30/10/2012 09:21:39 AM 1033 Views
Not true... - 30/10/2012 11:49:57 AM 1011 Views
One thing - 30/10/2012 05:23:17 PM 986 Views
That's the problem. The BC RJ has "built" has a minimum and a maximum value - 30/10/2012 05:48:55 PM 997 Views

Reply to Message