Active Users:1460 Time:22/07/2026 05:22:45 AM
One thing HousealThor Send a noteboard - 30/10/2012 05:23:17 PM
If the Wheel of Time really turns forever, and if every channeler gets a new draw from the distribution of strength with each rebirth, then if the distribution allows for negative strength, eventually there has to be someone with negative strength.

I'm not saying that every channeler does get a new draw, but it does seem like channeling strength isn't constant across lifetimes, unless none of the strong female AS from the AoL has been reborn between the AoL and the Third Age. Or at least between when the AS started keeping track of these things and the Third Age.

I'm simplifying things a great deal, but I know you get what I'm saying.
This message last edited by HousealThor on 30/10/2012 at 05:24:05 PM
Reply to message
The Bell Curve revisited - 29/10/2012 09:44:09 AM 1759 Views
Re: The Bell Curve revisited - 29/10/2012 10:21:27 AM 1109 Views
That's incorrect... - 29/10/2012 10:26:49 AM 1687 Views
Re: That's incorrect... - 29/10/2012 10:36:32 AM 1085 Views
RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right... - 29/10/2012 02:11:19 PM 1025 Views
Response to a few of your poorly researched points... - 29/10/2012 02:31:17 PM 974 Views
Re: RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right... - 29/10/2012 02:37:33 PM 958 Views
Exactly... - 29/10/2012 02:39:30 PM 952 Views
there are dozens of reasons for this - 29/10/2012 08:18:18 PM 973 Views
Excellent point. - 29/10/2012 08:24:37 PM 1010 Views
Re: there are dozens of reasons for this - 29/10/2012 09:07:35 PM 925 Views
Again I don't argue that genetics play no role - 30/10/2012 01:57:24 AM 907 Views
Re: Again I don't argue that genetics play no role - 30/10/2012 07:07:17 AM 914 Views
I don't think it plays much role in the plot - 30/10/2012 03:17:55 PM 1071 Views
Once again just so,we are clear on my stance with Genetics and Strength - 30/10/2012 03:27:11 PM 915 Views
That the 1000 Novices aren't a random sample of the population? - 29/10/2012 08:23:47 PM 859 Views
And why would it be biased towards those with lower strength? - 29/10/2012 09:11:25 PM 880 Views
Absolutely no reason... - 30/10/2012 01:35:35 AM 964 Views
Re: Absolutely no reason... - 30/10/2012 06:43:54 AM 880 Views
Only if it was a random sampling. Which this is not. - 30/10/2012 01:58:34 PM 973 Views
That's exactly the point. I want you to explain why it wasn't random. - 30/10/2012 02:14:59 PM 895 Views
It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample! - 30/10/2012 02:43:03 PM 900 Views
Re: It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample! - 30/10/2012 02:47:30 PM 890 Views
Go read a stats text will you? - 30/10/2012 02:54:16 PM 877 Views
Done - 31/10/2012 09:34:11 AM 1669 Views
You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 10/11/2012 10:14:19 PM 1180 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 11:37:16 AM 999 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 07:14:48 PM 849 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 08:33:59 PM 1662 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 08:43:19 PM 1249 Views
Still nothing? - 10/11/2012 03:33:15 PM 1016 Views
Still doesn't explain the difference - 30/10/2012 07:01:53 PM 828 Views
Re: Still doesn't explain the difference - 10/11/2012 10:21:00 PM 923 Views
Yes that totally makes sense - 30/10/2012 08:07:16 AM 1004 Views
Thank you! *NM* - 30/10/2012 10:19:15 AM 473 Views
That's not what happened... - 30/10/2012 02:01:52 PM 980 Views
Re: That's not what happened... - 30/10/2012 02:15:57 PM 884 Views
Who said it would? - 30/10/2012 02:44:17 PM 906 Views
let's not mix up "random" and "representative" - 30/10/2012 05:28:09 PM 959 Views
Doesn't mean RJ applied it to his series - 30/10/2012 08:23:29 AM 977 Views
But of course he did.. - 30/10/2012 02:13:07 PM 1027 Views
I hate to get into these things - 29/10/2012 05:45:50 PM 1053 Views
I would love for you to be right, because it would solve all our problems, but 0 is the challenge... - 29/10/2012 07:56:34 PM 1048 Views
In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed - 29/10/2012 08:20:52 PM 1032 Views
Overwhelm Lanfear, not match her. *NM* - 29/10/2012 08:26:09 PM 541 Views
Truth is, Moiraine was being overly optimistic... - 29/10/2012 08:39:17 PM 950 Views
You're pathetic... - 30/10/2012 01:20:01 AM 881 Views
The quote isn't specific - 30/10/2012 08:32:36 AM 988 Views
Its highly specific... - 30/10/2012 02:15:38 PM 837 Views
Yet neither of them are at full potential and at least equal a Forsaken - 30/10/2012 03:45:24 PM 1497 Views
Honestly! - 30/10/2012 02:07:37 AM 935 Views
Re: In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed - 29/10/2012 09:10:27 PM 952 Views
Lots of people mean perfectly normal distribution when they say it - 30/10/2012 05:25:35 PM 890 Views
Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame? - 30/10/2012 12:04:01 AM 1086 Views
Re: Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame? - 30/10/2012 09:33:44 AM 1010 Views
Are you sure about that? - 30/10/2012 12:03:43 PM 1009 Views
Re: Are you sure about that? - 30/10/2012 12:19:34 PM 909 Views
That doesn't seem a coherent narrative to me - 30/10/2012 04:26:25 PM 1258 Views
Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola - 30/10/2012 05:16:40 PM 1027 Views
Re: Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola - 30/10/2012 05:54:41 PM 896 Views
We do not know if Cadsuane or any of the Forsaken are Sparkers - 30/10/2012 10:33:55 PM 1059 Views
you're confusing 2 things - 30/10/2012 04:27:32 AM 1183 Views
+1 *NM* - 30/10/2012 09:17:07 AM 1056 Views
Re: you're confusing 2 things - 30/10/2012 09:21:39 AM 1033 Views
Not true... - 30/10/2012 11:49:57 AM 1011 Views
One thing - 30/10/2012 05:23:17 PM 986 Views
That's the problem. The BC RJ has "built" has a minimum and a maximum value - 30/10/2012 05:48:55 PM 997 Views

Reply to Message