Active Users:285 Time:15/05/2024 12:12:31 AM
That's not what happened... fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 30/10/2012 02:01:52 PM

Egwene should have found 100,000 novices and a control group to fit into your theory.

If passing through miscellaneous villages, testing everyone, and accepting everyone isn't a random sample then god help us all.


They did not test everyone. They opened the Novice book and told women of all ages that they're welcome to try. Many women would have had family ties that would have held them back. Or other jobs they're happy with. Or did not like Aes Sedai. Or didn't have the guts. Or thought about it for too long and missed the chance. Or were unwell at the time.

That's why this is not a random sample.
Reply to message
The Bell Curve revisited - 29/10/2012 09:44:09 AM 1377 Views
Re: The Bell Curve revisited - 29/10/2012 10:21:27 AM 758 Views
That's incorrect... - 29/10/2012 10:26:49 AM 1321 Views
Re: That's incorrect... - 29/10/2012 10:36:32 AM 775 Views
RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right... - 29/10/2012 02:11:19 PM 651 Views
Response to a few of your poorly researched points... - 29/10/2012 02:31:17 PM 646 Views
Re: RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right... - 29/10/2012 02:37:33 PM 661 Views
Exactly... - 29/10/2012 02:39:30 PM 649 Views
there are dozens of reasons for this - 29/10/2012 08:18:18 PM 673 Views
Excellent point. - 29/10/2012 08:24:37 PM 685 Views
Re: there are dozens of reasons for this - 29/10/2012 09:07:35 PM 604 Views
Again I don't argue that genetics play no role - 30/10/2012 01:57:24 AM 557 Views
Re: Again I don't argue that genetics play no role - 30/10/2012 07:07:17 AM 601 Views
I don't think it plays much role in the plot - 30/10/2012 03:17:55 PM 751 Views
Once again just so,we are clear on my stance with Genetics and Strength - 30/10/2012 03:27:11 PM 619 Views
That the 1000 Novices aren't a random sample of the population? - 29/10/2012 08:23:47 PM 556 Views
And why would it be biased towards those with lower strength? - 29/10/2012 09:11:25 PM 552 Views
Absolutely no reason... - 30/10/2012 01:35:35 AM 666 Views
Re: Absolutely no reason... - 30/10/2012 06:43:54 AM 557 Views
Only if it was a random sampling. Which this is not. - 30/10/2012 01:58:34 PM 618 Views
That's exactly the point. I want you to explain why it wasn't random. - 30/10/2012 02:14:59 PM 570 Views
It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample! - 30/10/2012 02:43:03 PM 576 Views
Re: It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample! - 30/10/2012 02:47:30 PM 583 Views
Go read a stats text will you? - 30/10/2012 02:54:16 PM 579 Views
Done - 31/10/2012 09:34:11 AM 1235 Views
You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 10/11/2012 10:14:19 PM 830 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 11:37:16 AM 626 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 07:14:48 PM 512 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 08:33:59 PM 1268 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 08:43:19 PM 791 Views
Still nothing? - 10/11/2012 03:33:15 PM 586 Views
Still doesn't explain the difference - 30/10/2012 07:01:53 PM 531 Views
Re: Still doesn't explain the difference - 10/11/2012 10:21:00 PM 605 Views
Yes that totally makes sense - 30/10/2012 08:07:16 AM 698 Views
Thank you! *NM* - 30/10/2012 10:19:15 AM 320 Views
That's not what happened... - 30/10/2012 02:01:52 PM 616 Views
Re: That's not what happened... - 30/10/2012 02:15:57 PM 566 Views
Who said it would? - 30/10/2012 02:44:17 PM 596 Views
let's not mix up "random" and "representative" - 30/10/2012 05:28:09 PM 636 Views
Doesn't mean RJ applied it to his series - 30/10/2012 08:23:29 AM 654 Views
But of course he did.. - 30/10/2012 02:13:07 PM 664 Views
I hate to get into these things - 29/10/2012 05:45:50 PM 731 Views
I would love for you to be right, because it would solve all our problems, but 0 is the challenge... - 29/10/2012 07:56:34 PM 661 Views
In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed - 29/10/2012 08:20:52 PM 706 Views
Overwhelm Lanfear, not match her. *NM* - 29/10/2012 08:26:09 PM 357 Views
Truth is, Moiraine was being overly optimistic... - 29/10/2012 08:39:17 PM 631 Views
You're pathetic... - 30/10/2012 01:20:01 AM 573 Views
The quote isn't specific - 30/10/2012 08:32:36 AM 678 Views
Its highly specific... - 30/10/2012 02:15:38 PM 522 Views
Yet neither of them are at full potential and at least equal a Forsaken - 30/10/2012 03:45:24 PM 1171 Views
Honestly! - 30/10/2012 02:07:37 AM 603 Views
Re: In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed - 29/10/2012 09:10:27 PM 605 Views
Lots of people mean perfectly normal distribution when they say it - 30/10/2012 05:25:35 PM 551 Views
Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame? - 30/10/2012 12:04:01 AM 742 Views
Re: Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame? - 30/10/2012 09:33:44 AM 689 Views
Are you sure about that? - 30/10/2012 12:03:43 PM 678 Views
Re: Are you sure about that? - 30/10/2012 12:19:34 PM 607 Views
That doesn't seem a coherent narrative to me - 30/10/2012 04:26:25 PM 879 Views
Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola - 30/10/2012 05:16:40 PM 668 Views
Re: Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola - 30/10/2012 05:54:41 PM 599 Views
We do not know if Cadsuane or any of the Forsaken are Sparkers - 30/10/2012 10:33:55 PM 716 Views
you're confusing 2 things - 30/10/2012 04:27:32 AM 736 Views
+1 *NM* - 30/10/2012 09:17:07 AM 676 Views
Re: you're confusing 2 things - 30/10/2012 09:21:39 AM 673 Views
Not true... - 30/10/2012 11:49:57 AM 701 Views
One thing - 30/10/2012 05:23:17 PM 659 Views
That's the problem. The BC RJ has "built" has a minimum and a maximum value - 30/10/2012 05:48:55 PM 675 Views

Reply to Message