Again I don't argue that genetics play no role
darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 30/10/2012 01:57:24 AM
Look at the TR for instance. We've seen many more uber-channelers come from that tiny region and a much higher % that would be expected from such a small region. Dozens of men and women have been picked up by both Towers from the TR and they are ALL strong enough to be AS.
You are both trying to apply a total population % to isolated regional variations and tiny populations of the overall channeling pool.
You are both trying to apply a total population % to isolated regional variations and tiny populations of the overall channeling pool.
Again, 1000 is not a tiny sample, and, also again, aren't you now saying that genetics is relevant to sampling strength? What other explanation could there be for regional variations?
Clearly there is a role for both genetics and the soul. Transmigration skews this because those who have been been resurrected all have the exact same strength (except Lanfear who had special circumstances). But for those born naturally there is obviously an element of genetics involved in their strength. I'm fairly certain there is an RJ quote about this out there as well.
We hear about how the "old blood runs strong" in the TR and we've seen the Sea Folk women have entire family lines of very strong women.
1000 women of a potential field of perhaps millions is a tiny sample, especially when regionally skewed. All that added to the facts the author laid out make it obvious to me that these Novices are non-representative. Personally I think most of the purpose they served was to show that there are a huge number of potential Channelers in the world and that women like Sharina could be hidden almost anywhere
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
The Bell Curve revisited
29/10/2012 09:44:09 AM
- 1377 Views
Re: The Bell Curve revisited
29/10/2012 10:21:27 AM
- 757 Views
That's incorrect...
29/10/2012 10:26:49 AM
- 1320 Views
Re: That's incorrect...
29/10/2012 10:36:32 AM
- 775 Views
Re: That's incorrect...
29/10/2012 10:40:27 AM
- 628 Views
Re: That's incorrect...
29/10/2012 10:42:57 AM
- 628 Views
Hehe...There are a few disputing it vocally. Whether they're in their right mind, well...
29/10/2012 10:45:07 AM
- 717 Views
Re: Hehe...There are a few disputing it vocally. Whether they're in their right mind, well...
29/10/2012 10:49:49 AM
- 612 Views
Re: Hehe...There are a few disputing it vocally. Whether they're in their right mind, well...
29/10/2012 10:56:37 AM
- 697 Views
It's only as skewed as it seems when you make the assumption that the Forsaken
31/10/2012 04:34:11 AM
- 908 Views
RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right...
29/10/2012 02:11:19 PM
- 650 Views
Re: RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right...
29/10/2012 02:37:33 PM
- 661 Views
there are dozens of reasons for this
29/10/2012 08:18:18 PM
- 671 Views
Re: there are dozens of reasons for this
29/10/2012 09:07:35 PM
- 603 Views
Again I don't argue that genetics play no role
30/10/2012 01:57:24 AM
- 557 Views
Once again just so,we are clear on my stance with Genetics and Strength
30/10/2012 03:27:11 PM
- 619 Views
That the 1000 Novices aren't a random sample of the population?
29/10/2012 08:23:47 PM
- 555 Views
And why would it be biased towards those with lower strength?
29/10/2012 09:11:25 PM
- 552 Views
Absolutely no reason...
30/10/2012 01:35:35 AM
- 665 Views
Re: Absolutely no reason...
30/10/2012 06:43:54 AM
- 557 Views
Only if it was a random sampling. Which this is not.
30/10/2012 01:58:34 PM
- 617 Views
That's exactly the point. I want you to explain why it wasn't random.
30/10/2012 02:14:59 PM
- 570 Views
It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample!
30/10/2012 02:43:03 PM
- 575 Views
Re: It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample!
30/10/2012 02:47:30 PM
- 583 Views
Go read a stats text will you?
30/10/2012 02:54:16 PM
- 577 Views
Done
31/10/2012 09:34:11 AM
- 1235 Views
You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent...
10/11/2012 10:14:19 PM
- 830 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent...
11/11/2012 11:37:16 AM
- 626 Views
Seriously? I went and looked at some statistics books, and you won't even reply?
01/11/2012 12:13:49 PM
- 594 Views
Yes that totally makes sense
30/10/2012 08:07:16 AM
- 698 Views
That's not what happened...
30/10/2012 02:01:52 PM
- 615 Views
I hate to get into these things
29/10/2012 05:45:50 PM
- 731 Views
I would love for you to be right, because it would solve all our problems, but 0 is the challenge...
29/10/2012 07:56:34 PM
- 661 Views
In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed
29/10/2012 08:20:52 PM
- 706 Views
Overwhelm Lanfear, not match her. *NM*
29/10/2012 08:26:09 PM
- 357 Views
Truth is, Moiraine was being overly optimistic...
29/10/2012 08:39:17 PM
- 629 Views
You're pathetic...
30/10/2012 01:20:01 AM
- 573 Views
The quote isn't specific
30/10/2012 08:32:36 AM
- 678 Views
Yet neither of them are at full potential and at least equal a Forsaken
30/10/2012 03:45:24 PM
- 1171 Views
Re: In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed
29/10/2012 09:10:27 PM
- 604 Views
Lots of people mean perfectly normal distribution when they say it
30/10/2012 05:25:35 PM
- 550 Views
Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame?
30/10/2012 12:04:01 AM
- 741 Views
Re: Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame?
30/10/2012 09:33:44 AM
- 689 Views
Are you sure about that?
30/10/2012 12:03:43 PM
- 677 Views
Re: Are you sure about that?
30/10/2012 12:19:34 PM
- 607 Views
That doesn't seem a coherent narrative to me
30/10/2012 04:26:25 PM
- 879 Views
Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola
30/10/2012 05:16:40 PM
- 667 Views
Re: Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola
30/10/2012 05:54:41 PM
- 598 Views
We do not know if Cadsuane or any of the Forsaken are Sparkers
30/10/2012 10:33:55 PM
- 716 Views
Re: We do not know if Cadsuane or any of the Forsaken are Sparkers
31/10/2012 12:30:52 AM
- 664 Views
A handful of examples are all we have and we have proof that an extremely strong Channeler
31/10/2012 02:58:57 AM
- 501 Views
you're confusing 2 things
30/10/2012 04:27:32 AM
- 735 Views
One thing
30/10/2012 05:23:17 PM
- 657 Views
That's the problem. The BC RJ has "built" has a minimum and a maximum value
30/10/2012 05:48:55 PM
- 674 Views