If the Wheel of Time really turns forever, and if every channeler gets a new draw from the distribution of strength with each rebirth, then if the distribution allows for negative strength, eventually there has to be someone with negative strength.
I'm not saying that every channeler does get a new draw, but it does seem like channeling strength isn't constant across lifetimes, unless none of the strong female AS from the AoL has been reborn between the AoL and the Third Age. Or at least between when the AS started keeping track of these things and the Third Age.
I'm simplifying things a great deal, but I know you get what I'm saying.
I'm not saying that every channeler does get a new draw, but it does seem like channeling strength isn't constant across lifetimes, unless none of the strong female AS from the AoL has been reborn between the AoL and the Third Age. Or at least between when the AS started keeping track of these things and the Third Age.
I'm simplifying things a great deal, but I know you get what I'm saying.
This message last edited by HousealThor on 30/10/2012 at 05:24:05 PM
The Bell Curve revisited
- 29/10/2012 09:44:09 AM
1622 Views
Re: The Bell Curve revisited
- 29/10/2012 10:21:27 AM
995 Views
That's incorrect...
- 29/10/2012 10:26:49 AM
1584 Views
Re: That's incorrect...
- 29/10/2012 10:36:32 AM
973 Views
Re: That's incorrect...
- 29/10/2012 10:40:27 AM
838 Views
Re: That's incorrect...
- 29/10/2012 10:42:57 AM
822 Views
Hehe...There are a few disputing it vocally. Whether they're in their right mind, well...
- 29/10/2012 10:45:07 AM
922 Views
Re: Hehe...There are a few disputing it vocally. Whether they're in their right mind, well...
- 29/10/2012 10:49:49 AM
818 Views
Re: Hehe...There are a few disputing it vocally. Whether they're in their right mind, well...
- 29/10/2012 10:56:37 AM
901 Views
It's only as skewed as it seems when you make the assumption that the Forsaken
- 31/10/2012 04:34:11 AM
1140 Views
RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right...
- 29/10/2012 02:11:19 PM
917 Views
Re: RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right...
- 29/10/2012 02:37:33 PM
856 Views
there are dozens of reasons for this
- 29/10/2012 08:18:18 PM
870 Views
Re: there are dozens of reasons for this
- 29/10/2012 09:07:35 PM
818 Views
Again I don't argue that genetics play no role
- 30/10/2012 01:57:24 AM
796 Views
Once again just so,we are clear on my stance with Genetics and Strength
- 30/10/2012 03:27:11 PM
818 Views
That the 1000 Novices aren't a random sample of the population?
- 29/10/2012 08:23:47 PM
757 Views
And why would it be biased towards those with lower strength?
- 29/10/2012 09:11:25 PM
771 Views
Absolutely no reason...
- 30/10/2012 01:35:35 AM
863 Views
Re: Absolutely no reason...
- 30/10/2012 06:43:54 AM
772 Views
Only if it was a random sampling. Which this is not.
- 30/10/2012 01:58:34 PM
857 Views
That's exactly the point. I want you to explain why it wasn't random.
- 30/10/2012 02:14:59 PM
785 Views
It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample!
- 30/10/2012 02:43:03 PM
791 Views
Re: It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample!
- 30/10/2012 02:47:30 PM
792 Views
Go read a stats text will you?
- 30/10/2012 02:54:16 PM
781 Views
Done
- 31/10/2012 09:34:11 AM
1551 Views
You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent...
- 10/11/2012 10:14:19 PM
1065 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent...
- 11/11/2012 11:37:16 AM
889 Views
Seriously? I went and looked at some statistics books, and you won't even reply?
- 01/11/2012 12:13:49 PM
893 Views
Yes that totally makes sense
- 30/10/2012 08:07:16 AM
904 Views
- 30/10/2012 08:07:16 AM
904 Views
That's not what happened...
- 30/10/2012 02:01:52 PM
848 Views
I hate to get into these things
- 29/10/2012 05:45:50 PM
940 Views
I would love for you to be right, because it would solve all our problems, but 0 is the challenge...
- 29/10/2012 07:56:34 PM
923 Views
In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed
- 29/10/2012 08:20:52 PM
930 Views
Overwhelm Lanfear, not match her. *NM*
- 29/10/2012 08:26:09 PM
488 Views
Truth is, Moiraine was being overly optimistic...
- 29/10/2012 08:39:17 PM
843 Views
You're pathetic...
- 30/10/2012 01:20:01 AM
772 Views
The quote isn't specific
- 30/10/2012 08:32:36 AM
888 Views
Yet neither of them are at full potential and at least equal a Forsaken
- 30/10/2012 03:45:24 PM
1393 Views
Re: In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed
- 29/10/2012 09:10:27 PM
839 Views
Lots of people mean perfectly normal distribution when they say it
- 30/10/2012 05:25:35 PM
791 Views
Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame?
- 30/10/2012 12:04:01 AM
970 Views
Re: Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame?
- 30/10/2012 09:33:44 AM
903 Views
Are you sure about that?
- 30/10/2012 12:03:43 PM
895 Views
Re: Are you sure about that?
- 30/10/2012 12:19:34 PM
810 Views
That doesn't seem a coherent narrative to me
- 30/10/2012 04:26:25 PM
1136 Views
Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola
- 30/10/2012 05:16:40 PM
912 Views
Re: Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola
- 30/10/2012 05:54:41 PM
786 Views
We do not know if Cadsuane or any of the Forsaken are Sparkers
- 30/10/2012 10:33:55 PM
922 Views
Re: We do not know if Cadsuane or any of the Forsaken are Sparkers
- 31/10/2012 12:30:52 AM
883 Views
A handful of examples are all we have and we have proof that an extremely strong Channeler
- 31/10/2012 02:58:57 AM
772 Views
you're confusing 2 things
- 30/10/2012 04:27:32 AM
1058 Views
One thing
- 30/10/2012 05:23:17 PM
879 Views
That's the problem. The BC RJ has "built" has a minimum and a maximum value
- 30/10/2012 05:48:55 PM
885 Views
