That it's additive and multiplied?
i.e.
Angreal might give multiplier X2 on base plus some fixed amount? This would explain how stronger channelers get more, but also explain how someone weak would get a large benefit.
Angreal, Sa'angreal and Moiraine at 66
- 11/01/2016 08:53:23 AM
2845 Views
Uhhh...
- 12/01/2016 12:07:42 AM
1444 Views
Yet there are problems with either
- 15/01/2016 08:52:04 PM
1149 Views
Re: Yet there are problems with either
- 16/01/2016 05:29:11 AM
1544 Views
Would you consider...
- 17/01/2016 09:06:59 AM
1254 Views
random thought on Shielding
- 19/01/2016 07:34:20 PM
1303 Views
You're forgetting the other side, though.
- 19/01/2016 08:19:59 PM
1383 Views
yes but it doesn't proactively do this
- 19/01/2016 10:06:25 PM
1235 Views
Responding to a shield doesn't require proactiveness
- 20/01/2016 05:53:24 AM
1155 Views
it's a visualization thing really
- 20/01/2016 04:39:08 PM
1193 Views
Not the crux of the debate...
- 21/01/2016 03:37:40 AM
1279 Views
Not really though
- 21/01/2016 05:00:34 PM
1046 Views
I always explained it as
- 21/01/2016 09:26:35 PM
1286 Views
There's not much to go on since all the shields except Berowyn's are the same
- 21/01/2016 09:55:14 PM
1176 Views
That's precisely my point
- 21/01/2016 10:09:02 PM
1261 Views
now you are speculating based on a lack of evidence
- 21/01/2016 10:39:13 PM
1092 Views
There's actual evidence:
- 22/01/2016 06:25:25 AM
1276 Views
what's dense here is that you keep putting in quotes that don't support your position
- 22/01/2016 03:28:16 PM
1443 Views
Whoa..
- 22/01/2016 04:24:19 PM
1352 Views
Not at all
- 22/01/2016 05:03:50 PM
1311 Views
Wonderful
- 22/01/2016 06:30:35 PM
1293 Views
yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this
- 22/01/2016 06:46:23 PM
1112 Views
Re: yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this
- 23/01/2016 02:35:33 PM
1521 Views
Hmmm....
- 23/01/2016 03:06:15 PM
1489 Views
Let me clear this up
- 25/01/2016 04:19:51 PM
1534 Views
Some more quotes
- 25/01/2016 05:10:51 PM
1282 Views
none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
- 25/01/2016 07:19:48 PM
1617 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
- 26/01/2016 03:45:52 AM
1300 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
- 26/01/2016 09:00:55 AM
1600 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
- 26/01/2016 10:39:49 AM
1273 Views
from the very beginning of this conversation I've been saying I'm theorizing
- 26/01/2016 04:09:19 PM
1171 Views
Yes, but that's not what I'm arguing...
- 16/01/2016 08:56:15 AM
1097 Views
But additive doesn't explain buffers and being able to overdraw
- 16/01/2016 03:02:33 PM
1143 Views
Don't those two facts explain each other?
- 16/01/2016 03:24:44 PM
1156 Views
It actually seems counterintuitive to me
- 19/01/2016 07:15:37 PM
1102 Views
Simple
- 19/01/2016 08:21:11 PM
1226 Views
Not at all
- 19/01/2016 10:17:39 PM
1010 Views
Huh?
- 20/01/2016 06:01:04 AM
1262 Views
agree to disagree I suppose ... I don't see it this way 
*NM*
- 20/01/2016 04:41:16 PM
675 Views
*NM*
- 20/01/2016 04:41:16 PM
675 Views
I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. *NM*
- 21/01/2016 12:01:16 AM
640 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position.
- 21/01/2016 02:07:21 AM
1116 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position.
- 21/01/2016 03:32:59 AM
1164 Views
I don't necessarily think that's true
- 21/01/2016 05:07:40 PM
1230 Views
I don't see how magnifiers solve this
- 21/01/2016 10:01:17 PM
1192 Views
Re: I don't see how magnifiers solve this
- 21/01/2016 10:16:16 PM
1142 Views
Uhhh...
- 22/01/2016 06:51:11 AM
1298 Views
Funny, I just saw this post
- 17/09/2016 11:13:09 PM
1028 Views