That it's additive and multiplied?
i.e.
Angreal might give multiplier X2 on base plus some fixed amount? This would explain how stronger channelers get more, but also explain how someone weak would get a large benefit.
Angreal, Sa'angreal and Moiraine at 66
- 11/01/2016 08:53:23 AM
2482 Views
Uhhh...
- 12/01/2016 12:07:42 AM
1312 Views
Yet there are problems with either
- 15/01/2016 08:52:04 PM
1017 Views
Re: Yet there are problems with either
- 16/01/2016 05:29:11 AM
1272 Views
Would you consider...
- 17/01/2016 09:06:59 AM
1119 Views
random thought on Shielding
- 19/01/2016 07:34:20 PM
1152 Views
You're forgetting the other side, though.
- 19/01/2016 08:19:59 PM
1245 Views
yes but it doesn't proactively do this
- 19/01/2016 10:06:25 PM
1096 Views
Responding to a shield doesn't require proactiveness
- 20/01/2016 05:53:24 AM
1012 Views
it's a visualization thing really
- 20/01/2016 04:39:08 PM
1057 Views
Not the crux of the debate...
- 21/01/2016 03:37:40 AM
1112 Views
Not really though
- 21/01/2016 05:00:34 PM
918 Views
I always explained it as
- 21/01/2016 09:26:35 PM
1142 Views
There's not much to go on since all the shields except Berowyn's are the same
- 21/01/2016 09:55:14 PM
1033 Views
That's precisely my point
- 21/01/2016 10:09:02 PM
1121 Views
now you are speculating based on a lack of evidence
- 21/01/2016 10:39:13 PM
961 Views
There's actual evidence:
- 22/01/2016 06:25:25 AM
1131 Views
what's dense here is that you keep putting in quotes that don't support your position
- 22/01/2016 03:28:16 PM
1296 Views
Whoa..
- 22/01/2016 04:24:19 PM
1213 Views
Not at all
- 22/01/2016 05:03:50 PM
1179 Views
Wonderful
- 22/01/2016 06:30:35 PM
1162 Views
yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this
- 22/01/2016 06:46:23 PM
980 Views
Re: yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this
- 23/01/2016 02:35:33 PM
1257 Views
Hmmm....
- 23/01/2016 03:06:15 PM
1219 Views
Let me clear this up
- 25/01/2016 04:19:51 PM
1360 Views
Some more quotes
- 25/01/2016 05:10:51 PM
1139 Views
none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
- 25/01/2016 07:19:48 PM
1420 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
- 26/01/2016 03:45:52 AM
1155 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
- 26/01/2016 09:00:55 AM
1335 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
- 26/01/2016 10:39:49 AM
1125 Views
from the very beginning of this conversation I've been saying I'm theorizing
- 26/01/2016 04:09:19 PM
1039 Views
Yes, but that's not what I'm arguing...
- 16/01/2016 08:56:15 AM
964 Views
But additive doesn't explain buffers and being able to overdraw
- 16/01/2016 03:02:33 PM
985 Views
Don't those two facts explain each other?
- 16/01/2016 03:24:44 PM
1031 Views
It actually seems counterintuitive to me
- 19/01/2016 07:15:37 PM
985 Views
Simple
- 19/01/2016 08:21:11 PM
1101 Views
Not at all
- 19/01/2016 10:17:39 PM
869 Views
Huh?
- 20/01/2016 06:01:04 AM
1108 Views
agree to disagree I suppose ... I don't see it this way 
*NM*
- 20/01/2016 04:41:16 PM
581 Views
*NM*
- 20/01/2016 04:41:16 PM
581 Views
I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. *NM*
- 21/01/2016 12:01:16 AM
541 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position.
- 21/01/2016 02:07:21 AM
989 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position.
- 21/01/2016 03:32:59 AM
1001 Views
I don't necessarily think that's true
- 21/01/2016 05:07:40 PM
1101 Views
I don't see how magnifiers solve this
- 21/01/2016 10:01:17 PM
1058 Views
Re: I don't see how magnifiers solve this
- 21/01/2016 10:16:16 PM
1011 Views
Uhhh...
- 22/01/2016 06:51:11 AM
1154 Views
Funny, I just saw this post
- 17/09/2016 11:13:09 PM
898 Views