That it's additive and multiplied?
i.e.
Angreal might give multiplier X2 on base plus some fixed amount? This would explain how stronger channelers get more, but also explain how someone weak would get a large benefit.
Angreal, Sa'angreal and Moiraine at 66
- 11/01/2016 08:53:23 AM
3039 Views
Uhhh...
- 12/01/2016 12:07:42 AM
1535 Views
Yet there are problems with either
- 15/01/2016 08:52:04 PM
1255 Views
Re: Yet there are problems with either
- 16/01/2016 05:29:11 AM
1637 Views
Would you consider...
- 17/01/2016 09:06:59 AM
1321 Views
random thought on Shielding
- 19/01/2016 07:34:20 PM
1391 Views
You're forgetting the other side, though.
- 19/01/2016 08:19:59 PM
1485 Views
yes but it doesn't proactively do this
- 19/01/2016 10:06:25 PM
1332 Views
Responding to a shield doesn't require proactiveness
- 20/01/2016 05:53:24 AM
1251 Views
it's a visualization thing really
- 20/01/2016 04:39:08 PM
1284 Views
Not the crux of the debate...
- 21/01/2016 03:37:40 AM
1365 Views
Not really though
- 21/01/2016 05:00:34 PM
1118 Views
I always explained it as
- 21/01/2016 09:26:35 PM
1392 Views
There's not much to go on since all the shields except Berowyn's are the same
- 21/01/2016 09:55:14 PM
1251 Views
That's precisely my point
- 21/01/2016 10:09:02 PM
1354 Views
now you are speculating based on a lack of evidence
- 21/01/2016 10:39:13 PM
1197 Views
There's actual evidence:
- 22/01/2016 06:25:25 AM
1362 Views
what's dense here is that you keep putting in quotes that don't support your position
- 22/01/2016 03:28:16 PM
1547 Views
Whoa..
- 22/01/2016 04:24:19 PM
1431 Views
Not at all
- 22/01/2016 05:03:50 PM
1375 Views
Wonderful
- 22/01/2016 06:30:35 PM
1365 Views
yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this
- 22/01/2016 06:46:23 PM
1193 Views
Re: yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this
- 23/01/2016 02:35:33 PM
1602 Views
Hmmm....
- 23/01/2016 03:06:15 PM
1596 Views
Let me clear this up
- 25/01/2016 04:19:51 PM
1632 Views
Some more quotes
- 25/01/2016 05:10:51 PM
1380 Views
none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
- 25/01/2016 07:19:48 PM
1729 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
- 26/01/2016 03:45:52 AM
1373 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
- 26/01/2016 09:00:55 AM
1671 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
- 26/01/2016 10:39:49 AM
1352 Views
from the very beginning of this conversation I've been saying I'm theorizing
- 26/01/2016 04:09:19 PM
1264 Views
Yes, but that's not what I'm arguing...
- 16/01/2016 08:56:15 AM
1199 Views
But additive doesn't explain buffers and being able to overdraw
- 16/01/2016 03:02:33 PM
1249 Views
Don't those two facts explain each other?
- 16/01/2016 03:24:44 PM
1247 Views
It actually seems counterintuitive to me
- 19/01/2016 07:15:37 PM
1191 Views
Simple
- 19/01/2016 08:21:11 PM
1308 Views
Not at all
- 19/01/2016 10:17:39 PM
1102 Views
Huh?
- 20/01/2016 06:01:04 AM
1371 Views
agree to disagree I suppose ... I don't see it this way 
*NM*
- 20/01/2016 04:41:16 PM
729 Views
*NM*
- 20/01/2016 04:41:16 PM
729 Views
I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. *NM*
- 21/01/2016 12:01:16 AM
689 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position.
- 21/01/2016 02:07:21 AM
1215 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position.
- 21/01/2016 03:32:59 AM
1259 Views
I don't necessarily think that's true
- 21/01/2016 05:07:40 PM
1320 Views
I don't see how magnifiers solve this
- 21/01/2016 10:01:17 PM
1297 Views
Re: I don't see how magnifiers solve this
- 21/01/2016 10:16:16 PM
1257 Views
Uhhh...
- 22/01/2016 06:51:11 AM
1380 Views
Funny, I just saw this post
- 17/09/2016 11:13:09 PM
1112 Views