That it's additive and multiplied?
i.e.
Angreal might give multiplier X2 on base plus some fixed amount? This would explain how stronger channelers get more, but also explain how someone weak would get a large benefit.
Angreal, Sa'angreal and Moiraine at 66
- 11/01/2016 08:53:23 AM
2742 Views
Uhhh...
- 12/01/2016 12:07:42 AM
1401 Views
Yet there are problems with either
- 15/01/2016 08:52:04 PM
1109 Views
Re: Yet there are problems with either
- 16/01/2016 05:29:11 AM
1498 Views
Would you consider...
- 17/01/2016 09:06:59 AM
1215 Views
random thought on Shielding
- 19/01/2016 07:34:20 PM
1249 Views
You're forgetting the other side, though.
- 19/01/2016 08:19:59 PM
1339 Views
yes but it doesn't proactively do this
- 19/01/2016 10:06:25 PM
1191 Views
Responding to a shield doesn't require proactiveness
- 20/01/2016 05:53:24 AM
1107 Views
it's a visualization thing really
- 20/01/2016 04:39:08 PM
1156 Views
Not the crux of the debate...
- 21/01/2016 03:37:40 AM
1233 Views
Not really though
- 21/01/2016 05:00:34 PM
1011 Views
I always explained it as
- 21/01/2016 09:26:35 PM
1241 Views
There's not much to go on since all the shields except Berowyn's are the same
- 21/01/2016 09:55:14 PM
1135 Views
That's precisely my point
- 21/01/2016 10:09:02 PM
1221 Views
now you are speculating based on a lack of evidence
- 21/01/2016 10:39:13 PM
1052 Views
There's actual evidence:
- 22/01/2016 06:25:25 AM
1229 Views
what's dense here is that you keep putting in quotes that don't support your position
- 22/01/2016 03:28:16 PM
1396 Views
Whoa..
- 22/01/2016 04:24:19 PM
1310 Views
Not at all
- 22/01/2016 05:03:50 PM
1277 Views
Wonderful
- 22/01/2016 06:30:35 PM
1257 Views
yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this
- 22/01/2016 06:46:23 PM
1075 Views
Re: yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this
- 23/01/2016 02:35:33 PM
1479 Views
Hmmm....
- 23/01/2016 03:06:15 PM
1440 Views
Let me clear this up
- 25/01/2016 04:19:51 PM
1467 Views
Some more quotes
- 25/01/2016 05:10:51 PM
1241 Views
none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
- 25/01/2016 07:19:48 PM
1541 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
- 26/01/2016 03:45:52 AM
1254 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
- 26/01/2016 09:00:55 AM
1555 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
- 26/01/2016 10:39:49 AM
1227 Views
from the very beginning of this conversation I've been saying I'm theorizing
- 26/01/2016 04:09:19 PM
1136 Views
Yes, but that's not what I'm arguing...
- 16/01/2016 08:56:15 AM
1058 Views
But additive doesn't explain buffers and being able to overdraw
- 16/01/2016 03:02:33 PM
1086 Views
Don't those two facts explain each other?
- 16/01/2016 03:24:44 PM
1118 Views
It actually seems counterintuitive to me
- 19/01/2016 07:15:37 PM
1072 Views
Simple
- 19/01/2016 08:21:11 PM
1192 Views
Not at all
- 19/01/2016 10:17:39 PM
965 Views
Huh?
- 20/01/2016 06:01:04 AM
1205 Views
agree to disagree I suppose ... I don't see it this way 
*NM*
- 20/01/2016 04:41:16 PM
659 Views
*NM*
- 20/01/2016 04:41:16 PM
659 Views
I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. *NM*
- 21/01/2016 12:01:16 AM
621 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position.
- 21/01/2016 02:07:21 AM
1084 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position.
- 21/01/2016 03:32:59 AM
1095 Views
I don't necessarily think that's true
- 21/01/2016 05:07:40 PM
1195 Views
I don't see how magnifiers solve this
- 21/01/2016 10:01:17 PM
1151 Views
Re: I don't see how magnifiers solve this
- 21/01/2016 10:16:16 PM
1102 Views
Uhhh...
- 22/01/2016 06:51:11 AM
1248 Views
Funny, I just saw this post
- 17/09/2016 11:13:09 PM
988 Views