Active Users:141 Time:16/04/2024 07:42:23 PM
Oh well then I agree with you Sidious Send a noteboard - 26/01/2016 08:50:55 AM

Berowin directly says in her quote that her secret is practice. She's probably good with Spirit but she's clearly a woman who has spent decades playing with this weave and making it more efficient. It's possible that many different shields are possible. I don't think anyone, including the Forsaken, have taken the time to practice shielding to that degree but they do perhaps know of ways to weave stronger lattices that exceed Aes Sedai shields. We know from Elayne that practicing with Air made her very powerful with it, and Leane/Suian learned to work more efficiently with less saidar. Demandred said that he's had so much time to study war and dueling that no mortal man can match him, so there's a general theme of practice making perfect. It likely extends to the Power too.

Berowin probably found something new... A soft shield that bends. I suspect the standard weave is like a net made of rope and that perhaps some AOL individuals know how to weave shields made of metal wire. This is why Osan'gar says he can get around any shield.... The knot is where the flaw lies.

I think your theory is original and explains many shielding dilemmas in the series.

Wheel of Time board admin
Fan of Lanfear
Reply to message
Angreal, Sa'angreal and Moiraine at 66 - 11/01/2016 08:53:23 AM 2133 Views
Or we can choose to assume Elayne is incorrect - 11/01/2016 03:50:14 PM 1002 Views
Uhhh... - 12/01/2016 12:07:42 AM 1126 Views
Yet there are problems with either - 15/01/2016 08:52:04 PM 815 Views
Re: Yet there are problems with either - 16/01/2016 05:29:11 AM 1076 Views
Would you consider... - 17/01/2016 09:06:59 AM 938 Views
random thought on Shielding - 19/01/2016 07:34:20 PM 999 Views
You're forgetting the other side, though. - 19/01/2016 08:19:59 PM 1060 Views
yes but it doesn't proactively do this - 19/01/2016 10:06:25 PM 923 Views
Responding to a shield doesn't require proactiveness - 20/01/2016 05:53:24 AM 819 Views
it's a visualization thing really - 20/01/2016 04:39:08 PM 873 Views
Not the crux of the debate... - 21/01/2016 03:37:40 AM 962 Views
Not really though - 21/01/2016 05:00:34 PM 729 Views
I always explained it as - 21/01/2016 09:26:35 PM 967 Views
There's not much to go on since all the shields except Berowyn's are the same - 21/01/2016 09:55:14 PM 835 Views
That's precisely my point - 21/01/2016 10:09:02 PM 976 Views
now you are speculating based on a lack of evidence - 21/01/2016 10:39:13 PM 798 Views
There's actual evidence: - 22/01/2016 06:25:25 AM 989 Views
what's dense here is that you keep putting in quotes that don't support your position - 22/01/2016 03:28:16 PM 1109 Views
Whoa.. - 22/01/2016 04:24:19 PM 1057 Views
Not at all - 22/01/2016 05:03:50 PM 1004 Views
Wonderful - 22/01/2016 06:30:35 PM 979 Views
yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this - 22/01/2016 06:46:23 PM 796 Views
Re: yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this - 23/01/2016 02:35:33 PM 1094 Views
Petty much *NM* - 24/01/2016 02:50:32 PM 439 Views
Hmmm.... - 23/01/2016 03:06:15 PM 1044 Views
Let me clear this up - 25/01/2016 04:19:51 PM 1185 Views
Some more quotes - 25/01/2016 05:10:51 PM 943 Views
none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 25/01/2016 07:19:48 PM 1236 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 26/01/2016 03:45:52 AM 1010 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 26/01/2016 09:00:55 AM 1150 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 26/01/2016 10:39:49 AM 941 Views
Oh well then I agree with you - 26/01/2016 08:50:55 AM 1052 Views
thanks - 26/01/2016 04:26:46 PM 1207 Views
Yes, but that's not what I'm arguing... - 16/01/2016 08:56:15 AM 780 Views
But additive doesn't explain buffers and being able to overdraw - 16/01/2016 03:02:33 PM 813 Views
Don't those two facts explain each other? - 16/01/2016 03:24:44 PM 851 Views
It actually seems counterintuitive to me - 19/01/2016 07:15:37 PM 796 Views
Simple - 19/01/2016 08:21:11 PM 916 Views
Not at all - 19/01/2016 10:17:39 PM 704 Views
Huh? - 20/01/2016 06:01:04 AM 919 Views
agree to disagree I suppose ... I don't see it this way *NM* - 20/01/2016 04:41:16 PM 496 Views
I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. *NM* - 21/01/2016 12:01:16 AM 475 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. - 21/01/2016 02:07:21 AM 822 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. - 21/01/2016 03:32:59 AM 840 Views
I don't necessarily think that's true - 21/01/2016 05:07:40 PM 914 Views
I don't see how magnifiers solve this - 21/01/2016 10:01:17 PM 898 Views
Re: I don't see how magnifiers solve this - 21/01/2016 10:16:16 PM 842 Views
Uhhh... - 22/01/2016 06:51:11 AM 989 Views
Funny, I just saw this post - 17/09/2016 11:13:09 PM 707 Views
The very first chapter (the Prologue) disproves this - 03/10/2016 06:56:28 AM 782 Views
No it doesn't - 05/10/2016 12:47:03 AM 677 Views
Re: Don't those two facts explain each other? - 08/10/2016 05:06:53 AM 578 Views
Re: Yes, but that's not what I'm arguing... - 08/10/2016 04:52:06 AM 795 Views

Reply to Message