Active Users:218 Time:19/04/2024 05:58:13 AM
Not really though darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 21/01/2016 05:00:34 PM

View original post
I don't see any issues with how you think the Power flows into channelers. Only that it would affect shileding. We know for a fact that shielding is a matter of concentration (on both ends). So couldn't just as convincing a case be made, using exactly how you visualize things, that men, who need to focus so much on controlling saidin, are a lot more susceptible to shields?

We've only seen the strongest men have no issues shielding women. In fact, even Rand says shielding Shalon takes a considerable amount of the OP. We've seen no weaker men claim any ease in shielding women, and there have been multiple instances where this could have been stated.

Instead, all we have is RJ saying that shielding someone of the opposite sex is harder. He doesn't say men have it easier than women.


We've never once seen any man struggle to hold a woman, but we've seen many instances of women being unable to shield men. It's intuitively obvious that opposite sex shielding is more difficult in general and that shielding requires quite a bit of power in general. I'm attempting to theorize on WHY this is the case.

It seems to me that part of this reason is because of the nature of the relationship with the OP and each sex. A shield for a man would need to be constructed in a way that would allow for the very aggressive flow of saidin, while a shield for a woman would need to be more flexible to allow for the more immersive flow of saidar.

In theory a shield woven for a woman and placed on a man would tear/rip apart quickly because it's not rigid enough to absorb the velocity of saidin coming at it (assuming strength is in the proper range for a man to be able to break a woman's shield etc). Just as a rigid shield designed to hold a man would shatter rather easily from the mass of saidar coming at it.

Naturally overall strength will make an impact, but I think this is why a woman can easily be held by a weaker woman and to be honest I believe it's easier for a man to shield a woman than it is for a woman to shield a man. I also believe it is easier for a man to shield a man but overall I think it's just harder to shield a man in general

man shielding woman < woman shielding woman < man shielding man < woman shielding man

Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
Reply to message
Angreal, Sa'angreal and Moiraine at 66 - 11/01/2016 08:53:23 AM 2139 Views
Or we can choose to assume Elayne is incorrect - 11/01/2016 03:50:14 PM 1005 Views
Uhhh... - 12/01/2016 12:07:42 AM 1129 Views
Yet there are problems with either - 15/01/2016 08:52:04 PM 818 Views
Re: Yet there are problems with either - 16/01/2016 05:29:11 AM 1080 Views
Would you consider... - 17/01/2016 09:06:59 AM 942 Views
random thought on Shielding - 19/01/2016 07:34:20 PM 1002 Views
You're forgetting the other side, though. - 19/01/2016 08:19:59 PM 1064 Views
yes but it doesn't proactively do this - 19/01/2016 10:06:25 PM 926 Views
Responding to a shield doesn't require proactiveness - 20/01/2016 05:53:24 AM 822 Views
it's a visualization thing really - 20/01/2016 04:39:08 PM 876 Views
Not the crux of the debate... - 21/01/2016 03:37:40 AM 965 Views
Not really though - 21/01/2016 05:00:34 PM 733 Views
I always explained it as - 21/01/2016 09:26:35 PM 971 Views
There's not much to go on since all the shields except Berowyn's are the same - 21/01/2016 09:55:14 PM 838 Views
That's precisely my point - 21/01/2016 10:09:02 PM 980 Views
now you are speculating based on a lack of evidence - 21/01/2016 10:39:13 PM 802 Views
There's actual evidence: - 22/01/2016 06:25:25 AM 992 Views
what's dense here is that you keep putting in quotes that don't support your position - 22/01/2016 03:28:16 PM 1112 Views
Whoa.. - 22/01/2016 04:24:19 PM 1061 Views
Not at all - 22/01/2016 05:03:50 PM 1008 Views
Wonderful - 22/01/2016 06:30:35 PM 982 Views
yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this - 22/01/2016 06:46:23 PM 800 Views
Re: yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this - 23/01/2016 02:35:33 PM 1098 Views
Petty much *NM* - 24/01/2016 02:50:32 PM 440 Views
Hmmm.... - 23/01/2016 03:06:15 PM 1048 Views
Let me clear this up - 25/01/2016 04:19:51 PM 1188 Views
Some more quotes - 25/01/2016 05:10:51 PM 946 Views
none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 25/01/2016 07:19:48 PM 1239 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 26/01/2016 03:45:52 AM 1013 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 26/01/2016 09:00:55 AM 1154 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 26/01/2016 10:39:49 AM 944 Views
Oh well then I agree with you - 26/01/2016 08:50:55 AM 1057 Views
thanks - 26/01/2016 04:26:46 PM 1214 Views
Yes, but that's not what I'm arguing... - 16/01/2016 08:56:15 AM 783 Views
But additive doesn't explain buffers and being able to overdraw - 16/01/2016 03:02:33 PM 816 Views
Don't those two facts explain each other? - 16/01/2016 03:24:44 PM 854 Views
It actually seems counterintuitive to me - 19/01/2016 07:15:37 PM 799 Views
Simple - 19/01/2016 08:21:11 PM 919 Views
Not at all - 19/01/2016 10:17:39 PM 707 Views
Huh? - 20/01/2016 06:01:04 AM 922 Views
agree to disagree I suppose ... I don't see it this way *NM* - 20/01/2016 04:41:16 PM 497 Views
I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. *NM* - 21/01/2016 12:01:16 AM 476 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. - 21/01/2016 02:07:21 AM 825 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. - 21/01/2016 03:32:59 AM 843 Views
I don't necessarily think that's true - 21/01/2016 05:07:40 PM 917 Views
I don't see how magnifiers solve this - 21/01/2016 10:01:17 PM 903 Views
Re: I don't see how magnifiers solve this - 21/01/2016 10:16:16 PM 845 Views
Uhhh... - 22/01/2016 06:51:11 AM 992 Views
Funny, I just saw this post - 17/09/2016 11:13:09 PM 711 Views
The very first chapter (the Prologue) disproves this - 03/10/2016 06:56:28 AM 785 Views
No it doesn't - 05/10/2016 12:47:03 AM 680 Views
Re: Don't those two facts explain each other? - 08/10/2016 05:06:53 AM 581 Views
Re: Yes, but that's not what I'm arguing... - 08/10/2016 04:52:06 AM 798 Views

Reply to Message