Active Users:105 Time:16/05/2022 10:10:03 AM
I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. *NM* fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 21/01/2016 12:01:16 AM
Reply to message
Angreal, Sa'angreal and Moiraine at 66 - 11/01/2016 08:53:23 AM 1832 Views
Or we can choose to assume Elayne is incorrect - 11/01/2016 03:50:14 PM 881 Views
Uhhh... - 12/01/2016 12:07:42 AM 989 Views
Yet there are problems with either - 15/01/2016 08:52:04 PM 679 Views
Re: Yet there are problems with either - 16/01/2016 05:29:11 AM 921 Views
Would you consider... - 17/01/2016 09:06:59 AM 814 Views
random thought on Shielding - 19/01/2016 07:34:20 PM 877 Views
You're forgetting the other side, though. - 19/01/2016 08:19:59 PM 935 Views
yes but it doesn't proactively do this - 19/01/2016 10:06:25 PM 813 Views
Responding to a shield doesn't require proactiveness - 20/01/2016 05:53:24 AM 701 Views
it's a visualization thing really - 20/01/2016 04:39:08 PM 753 Views
Not the crux of the debate... - 21/01/2016 03:37:40 AM 826 Views
Not really though - 21/01/2016 05:00:34 PM 610 Views
I always explained it as - 21/01/2016 09:26:35 PM 812 Views
There's not much to go on since all the shields except Berowyn's are the same - 21/01/2016 09:55:14 PM 707 Views
That's precisely my point - 21/01/2016 10:09:02 PM 841 Views
now you are speculating based on a lack of evidence - 21/01/2016 10:39:13 PM 685 Views
There's actual evidence: - 22/01/2016 06:25:25 AM 864 Views
what's dense here is that you keep putting in quotes that don't support your position - 22/01/2016 03:28:16 PM 978 Views
Whoa.. - 22/01/2016 04:24:19 PM 929 Views
Not at all - 22/01/2016 05:03:50 PM 873 Views
Wonderful - 22/01/2016 06:30:35 PM 853 Views
yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this - 22/01/2016 06:46:23 PM 680 Views
Re: yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this - 23/01/2016 02:35:33 PM 921 Views
Petty much *NM* - 24/01/2016 02:50:32 PM 362 Views
Hmmm.... - 23/01/2016 03:06:15 PM 865 Views
Let me clear this up - 25/01/2016 04:19:51 PM 1054 Views
Some more quotes - 25/01/2016 05:10:51 PM 820 Views
none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 25/01/2016 07:19:48 PM 1120 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 26/01/2016 03:45:52 AM 887 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 26/01/2016 09:00:55 AM 978 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 26/01/2016 10:39:49 AM 813 Views
Oh well then I agree with you - 26/01/2016 08:50:55 AM 886 Views
thanks - 26/01/2016 04:26:46 PM 1059 Views
Yes, but that's not what I'm arguing... - 16/01/2016 08:56:15 AM 649 Views
But additive doesn't explain buffers and being able to overdraw - 16/01/2016 03:02:33 PM 695 Views
Don't those two facts explain each other? - 16/01/2016 03:24:44 PM 724 Views
It actually seems counterintuitive to me - 19/01/2016 07:15:37 PM 684 Views
Simple - 19/01/2016 08:21:11 PM 801 Views
Not at all - 19/01/2016 10:17:39 PM 586 Views
Huh? - 20/01/2016 06:01:04 AM 768 Views
agree to disagree I suppose ... I don't see it this way *NM* - 20/01/2016 04:41:16 PM 410 Views
I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. *NM* - 21/01/2016 12:01:16 AM 390 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. - 21/01/2016 02:07:21 AM 715 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. - 21/01/2016 03:32:59 AM 725 Views
I don't necessarily think that's true - 21/01/2016 05:07:40 PM 804 Views
I don't see how magnifiers solve this - 21/01/2016 10:01:17 PM 780 Views
Re: I don't see how magnifiers solve this - 21/01/2016 10:16:16 PM 729 Views
Uhhh... - 22/01/2016 06:51:11 AM 872 Views
Funny, I just saw this post - 17/09/2016 11:13:09 PM 586 Views
The very first chapter (the Prologue) disproves this - 03/10/2016 06:56:28 AM 669 Views
No it doesn't - 05/10/2016 12:47:03 AM 580 Views
Re: Don't those two facts explain each other? - 08/10/2016 05:06:53 AM 456 Views
Re: Yes, but that's not what I'm arguing... - 08/10/2016 04:52:06 AM 689 Views

Reply to Message