If sa'angreal are magnifiers, how are we explaining bufferless ones? Take Callandor. Let's say it magnifies by 100X and you're still safe. So if you overdraw and draw in 200X, aren't you still saying "a lack of a buffer allows access to additional power beyond what the angreal was designed for"??
Angreal, Sa'angreal and Moiraine at 66
- 11/01/2016 08:53:23 AM
3557 Views
Uhhh...
- 12/01/2016 12:07:42 AM
1728 Views
Yet there are problems with either
- 15/01/2016 08:52:04 PM
1458 Views
Re: Yet there are problems with either
- 16/01/2016 05:29:11 AM
1852 Views
random thought on Shielding
- 19/01/2016 07:34:20 PM
1576 Views
You're forgetting the other side, though.
- 19/01/2016 08:19:59 PM
1663 Views
yes but it doesn't proactively do this
- 19/01/2016 10:06:25 PM
1515 Views
Responding to a shield doesn't require proactiveness
- 20/01/2016 05:53:24 AM
1434 Views
it's a visualization thing really
- 20/01/2016 04:39:08 PM
1463 Views
Not the crux of the debate...
- 21/01/2016 03:37:40 AM
1527 Views
Not really though
- 21/01/2016 05:00:34 PM
1320 Views
I always explained it as
- 21/01/2016 09:26:35 PM
1564 Views
There's not much to go on since all the shields except Berowyn's are the same
- 21/01/2016 09:55:14 PM
1458 Views
That's precisely my point
- 21/01/2016 10:09:02 PM
1519 Views
now you are speculating based on a lack of evidence
- 21/01/2016 10:39:13 PM
1395 Views
There's actual evidence:
- 22/01/2016 06:25:25 AM
1550 Views
what's dense here is that you keep putting in quotes that don't support your position
- 22/01/2016 03:28:16 PM
1734 Views
Whoa..
- 22/01/2016 04:24:19 PM
1572 Views
Not at all
- 22/01/2016 05:03:50 PM
1568 Views
Wonderful
- 22/01/2016 06:30:35 PM
1583 Views
yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this
- 22/01/2016 06:46:23 PM
1380 Views
Re: yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this
- 23/01/2016 02:35:33 PM
1789 Views
Hmmm....
- 23/01/2016 03:06:15 PM
1786 Views
Let me clear this up
- 25/01/2016 04:19:51 PM
1812 Views
Some more quotes
- 25/01/2016 05:10:51 PM
1561 Views
none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
- 25/01/2016 07:19:48 PM
1903 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
- 26/01/2016 03:45:52 AM
1538 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
- 26/01/2016 09:00:55 AM
1842 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
- 26/01/2016 10:39:49 AM
1544 Views
from the very beginning of this conversation I've been saying I'm theorizing
- 26/01/2016 04:09:19 PM
1452 Views
Yes, but that's not what I'm arguing...
- 16/01/2016 08:56:15 AM
1386 Views
But additive doesn't explain buffers and being able to overdraw
- 16/01/2016 03:02:33 PM
1442 Views
Don't those two facts explain each other?
- 16/01/2016 03:24:44 PM
1444 Views
It actually seems counterintuitive to me
- 19/01/2016 07:15:37 PM
1363 Views
Simple
- 19/01/2016 08:21:11 PM
1536 Views
Not at all
- 19/01/2016 10:17:39 PM
1309 Views
Huh?
- 20/01/2016 06:01:04 AM
1566 Views
agree to disagree I suppose ... I don't see it this way
*NM*
- 20/01/2016 04:41:16 PM
833 Views
*NM*
- 20/01/2016 04:41:16 PM
833 Views
I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. *NM*
- 21/01/2016 12:01:16 AM
768 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position.
- 21/01/2016 02:07:21 AM
1388 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position.
- 21/01/2016 03:32:59 AM
1442 Views
I don't necessarily think that's true
- 21/01/2016 05:07:40 PM
1515 Views
I don't see how magnifiers solve this
- 21/01/2016 10:01:17 PM
1454 Views
Re: I don't see how magnifiers solve this
- 21/01/2016 10:16:16 PM
1448 Views
Uhhh...
- 22/01/2016 06:51:11 AM
1580 Views
Funny, I just saw this post
- 17/09/2016 11:13:09 PM
1299 Views
