Active Users:208 Time:19/04/2024 06:21:16 PM
There's not much to go on since all the shields except Berowyn's are the same darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 21/01/2016 09:55:14 PM

View original post
As for why opposite sex shielding was harder, I always saw it as a function of saidin and saidar repelling each other.

When you place a saidin shield on a woman, apart from the strength issue, the inherent repulsion of saidar to saidin makes it harder to place the saidin shiled in the path of flowing saidar.

Same is true in reverse.

I find your own explanation problematic. You're saying that the gentler flow of saidar makes it easier to dam up. So you're saying you need a flexible shield. But we know that saidar shields are generally not flexible. Elayne in tDR compares the BA shield on them to a wall. And Rand does the same to the AS shiled on him. Berowyn's is the only flexible shield we know of. Talaan's shield on Nyn is also not flexible at all.

There seems to be no evidence for your theory, or the hierarchy you put up.


as I said earlier it's a visualization thing for me really. But don't forget that Berowyn's shield is by FAR the most effective one we ever see, in fact we know from an Aes Sedai perspective that she should not be able to hold a woman anywhere near to Nynaeve's strength ... which implies that the shields normally taught to Aes Sedai are rigid and not flexible and only work on women very close to your own strength. Galina notes that she could easily break Micarra's shield, who is 13 levels lower than Galina, meanwhile Berowyn is 38 levels below Nynaeve (3x the difference) and easily contains her, I wonder if she could hold a man equal to Nynaeve.

I suspect Aes Sedai shielding was "innovated" by the Red and was primarily used for shielding men. It goes, at least thematically, that most female centric channeling organizations would also have developed shielding methods more suited to holding men than women given the situation with the Taint.

saidar is a force that requires passive direction not manhandling, saidin is a force that requires aggressive maneuvering rather than guidance. The way I see an effective shield for saidar is the way Berowyn struck upon it, something flexible, meant to contain a heavy volume of liquid. The way I see an effective shield for saidin is more of an immovable object meant to stop bullets (i.e. bulletproof glass or if you wish to stay with the water theme, an umbrella stopping rain)

I do agree with you that the opposing natures of saidin and saidar probably play a role in this as well and likely enhances the difficulty with shields on the opposite sex.

Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
Reply to message
Angreal, Sa'angreal and Moiraine at 66 - 11/01/2016 08:53:23 AM 2139 Views
Or we can choose to assume Elayne is incorrect - 11/01/2016 03:50:14 PM 1006 Views
Uhhh... - 12/01/2016 12:07:42 AM 1130 Views
Yet there are problems with either - 15/01/2016 08:52:04 PM 819 Views
Re: Yet there are problems with either - 16/01/2016 05:29:11 AM 1080 Views
Would you consider... - 17/01/2016 09:06:59 AM 943 Views
random thought on Shielding - 19/01/2016 07:34:20 PM 1003 Views
You're forgetting the other side, though. - 19/01/2016 08:19:59 PM 1065 Views
yes but it doesn't proactively do this - 19/01/2016 10:06:25 PM 927 Views
Responding to a shield doesn't require proactiveness - 20/01/2016 05:53:24 AM 823 Views
it's a visualization thing really - 20/01/2016 04:39:08 PM 878 Views
Not the crux of the debate... - 21/01/2016 03:37:40 AM 968 Views
Not really though - 21/01/2016 05:00:34 PM 734 Views
I always explained it as - 21/01/2016 09:26:35 PM 972 Views
There's not much to go on since all the shields except Berowyn's are the same - 21/01/2016 09:55:14 PM 840 Views
That's precisely my point - 21/01/2016 10:09:02 PM 981 Views
now you are speculating based on a lack of evidence - 21/01/2016 10:39:13 PM 803 Views
There's actual evidence: - 22/01/2016 06:25:25 AM 994 Views
what's dense here is that you keep putting in quotes that don't support your position - 22/01/2016 03:28:16 PM 1113 Views
Whoa.. - 22/01/2016 04:24:19 PM 1062 Views
Not at all - 22/01/2016 05:03:50 PM 1009 Views
Wonderful - 22/01/2016 06:30:35 PM 983 Views
yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this - 22/01/2016 06:46:23 PM 801 Views
Re: yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this - 23/01/2016 02:35:33 PM 1098 Views
Petty much *NM* - 24/01/2016 02:50:32 PM 441 Views
Hmmm.... - 23/01/2016 03:06:15 PM 1048 Views
Let me clear this up - 25/01/2016 04:19:51 PM 1189 Views
Some more quotes - 25/01/2016 05:10:51 PM 947 Views
none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 25/01/2016 07:19:48 PM 1240 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 26/01/2016 03:45:52 AM 1014 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 26/01/2016 09:00:55 AM 1155 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 26/01/2016 10:39:49 AM 945 Views
Oh well then I agree with you - 26/01/2016 08:50:55 AM 1057 Views
thanks - 26/01/2016 04:26:46 PM 1215 Views
Yes, but that's not what I'm arguing... - 16/01/2016 08:56:15 AM 785 Views
But additive doesn't explain buffers and being able to overdraw - 16/01/2016 03:02:33 PM 817 Views
Don't those two facts explain each other? - 16/01/2016 03:24:44 PM 855 Views
It actually seems counterintuitive to me - 19/01/2016 07:15:37 PM 800 Views
Simple - 19/01/2016 08:21:11 PM 920 Views
Not at all - 19/01/2016 10:17:39 PM 708 Views
Huh? - 20/01/2016 06:01:04 AM 923 Views
agree to disagree I suppose ... I don't see it this way *NM* - 20/01/2016 04:41:16 PM 498 Views
I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. *NM* - 21/01/2016 12:01:16 AM 477 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. - 21/01/2016 02:07:21 AM 826 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. - 21/01/2016 03:32:59 AM 844 Views
I don't necessarily think that's true - 21/01/2016 05:07:40 PM 918 Views
I don't see how magnifiers solve this - 21/01/2016 10:01:17 PM 904 Views
Re: I don't see how magnifiers solve this - 21/01/2016 10:16:16 PM 846 Views
Uhhh... - 22/01/2016 06:51:11 AM 993 Views
Funny, I just saw this post - 17/09/2016 11:13:09 PM 712 Views
The very first chapter (the Prologue) disproves this - 03/10/2016 06:56:28 AM 786 Views
No it doesn't - 05/10/2016 12:47:03 AM 681 Views
Re: Don't those two facts explain each other? - 08/10/2016 05:06:53 AM 582 Views
Re: Yes, but that's not what I'm arguing... - 08/10/2016 04:52:06 AM 799 Views

Reply to Message