Active Users:582 Time:02/05/2026 06:21:49 PM
thanks darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 26/01/2016 04:26:46 PM

View original post

Berowin directly says in her quote that her secret is practice. She's probably good with Spirit but she's clearly a woman who has spent decades playing with this weave and making it more efficient. It's possible that many different shields are possible. I don't think anyone, including the Forsaken, have taken the time to practice shielding to that degree but they do perhaps know of ways to weave stronger lattices that exceed Aes Sedai shields. We know from Elayne that practicing with Air made her very powerful with it, and Leane/Suian learned to work more efficiently with less saidar. Demandred said that he's had so much time to study war and dueling that no mortal man can match him, so there's a general theme of practice making perfect. It likely extends to the Power too.

Berowin probably found something new... A soft shield that bends. I suspect the standard weave is like a net made of rope and that perhaps some AOL individuals know how to weave shields made of metal wire. This is why Osan'gar says he can get around any shield.... The knot is where the flaw lies.

I think your theory is original and explains many shielding dilemmas in the series.


I suspect that like nearly everything else from the AoL, Shielding probably was something that was taught in a way that made the individual as effective as they could be with the weaves available. Perhaps there were shield weaves that incorporated other (or even all) flows of the Power that allowed for those weaker in Spirit to still be effective at shielding. I could see how earth, air or water could help strengthen a shield and how fire could assist with cutting off someone already holding the source. I always felt like AoL training incorporated assessing an individual's flow strength and weaves were taught that would maximize said individual's effectiveness with any given area of OP use. Thus a man very weak in Spirit might still be able to shield if he as taught a weave that incorporated fire or earth.

IMO this plays into the Aes Sedai losing so much knowledge. Eventually training was made into a "one-size-fits-all" class which eventually lent itself to only those with the strongest potential or an obvious Talent could excel and effectively perform the specific weaves required to become Aes Sedai. Modern Aes Sedai seem to only know one or two weaves for any given effect and those who are weak simply accept that they cannot move forward with these weaves.

Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
Reply to message
Angreal, Sa'angreal and Moiraine at 66 - 11/01/2016 08:53:23 AM 3330 Views
Or we can choose to assume Elayne is incorrect - 11/01/2016 03:50:14 PM 1520 Views
Uhhh... - 12/01/2016 12:07:42 AM 1641 Views
Yet there are problems with either - 15/01/2016 08:52:04 PM 1372 Views
Re: Yet there are problems with either - 16/01/2016 05:29:11 AM 1764 Views
Would you consider... - 17/01/2016 09:06:59 AM 1436 Views
random thought on Shielding - 19/01/2016 07:34:20 PM 1497 Views
You're forgetting the other side, though. - 19/01/2016 08:19:59 PM 1589 Views
yes but it doesn't proactively do this - 19/01/2016 10:06:25 PM 1433 Views
Responding to a shield doesn't require proactiveness - 20/01/2016 05:53:24 AM 1366 Views
it's a visualization thing really - 20/01/2016 04:39:08 PM 1394 Views
Not the crux of the debate... - 21/01/2016 03:37:40 AM 1473 Views
Not really though - 21/01/2016 05:00:34 PM 1241 Views
I always explained it as - 21/01/2016 09:26:35 PM 1495 Views
There's not much to go on since all the shields except Berowyn's are the same - 21/01/2016 09:55:14 PM 1362 Views
That's precisely my point - 21/01/2016 10:09:02 PM 1457 Views
now you are speculating based on a lack of evidence - 21/01/2016 10:39:13 PM 1309 Views
There's actual evidence: - 22/01/2016 06:25:25 AM 1458 Views
what's dense here is that you keep putting in quotes that don't support your position - 22/01/2016 03:28:16 PM 1660 Views
Whoa.. - 22/01/2016 04:24:19 PM 1511 Views
Not at all - 22/01/2016 05:03:50 PM 1486 Views
Wonderful - 22/01/2016 06:30:35 PM 1516 Views
yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this - 22/01/2016 06:46:23 PM 1299 Views
Re: yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this - 23/01/2016 02:35:33 PM 1706 Views
Petty much *NM* - 24/01/2016 02:50:32 PM 764 Views
Hmmm.... - 23/01/2016 03:06:15 PM 1719 Views
Let me clear this up - 25/01/2016 04:19:51 PM 1745 Views
Some more quotes - 25/01/2016 05:10:51 PM 1495 Views
none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 25/01/2016 07:19:48 PM 1833 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 26/01/2016 03:45:52 AM 1466 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 26/01/2016 09:00:55 AM 1778 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 26/01/2016 10:39:49 AM 1464 Views
from the very beginning of this conversation I've been saying I'm theorizing - 26/01/2016 04:09:19 PM 1372 Views
Oh well then I agree with you - 26/01/2016 08:50:55 AM 1713 Views
thanks - 26/01/2016 04:26:46 PM 1726 Views
Yes, but that's not what I'm arguing... - 16/01/2016 08:56:15 AM 1303 Views
But additive doesn't explain buffers and being able to overdraw - 16/01/2016 03:02:33 PM 1362 Views
Don't those two facts explain each other? - 16/01/2016 03:24:44 PM 1365 Views
It actually seems counterintuitive to me - 19/01/2016 07:15:37 PM 1288 Views
Simple - 19/01/2016 08:21:11 PM 1421 Views
Not at all - 19/01/2016 10:17:39 PM 1219 Views
Huh? - 20/01/2016 06:01:04 AM 1488 Views
agree to disagree I suppose ... I don't see it this way *NM* - 20/01/2016 04:41:16 PM 783 Views
I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. *NM* - 21/01/2016 12:01:16 AM 733 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. - 21/01/2016 02:07:21 AM 1301 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. - 21/01/2016 03:32:59 AM 1358 Views
I don't necessarily think that's true - 21/01/2016 05:07:40 PM 1424 Views
I don't see how magnifiers solve this - 21/01/2016 10:01:17 PM 1384 Views
Re: I don't see how magnifiers solve this - 21/01/2016 10:16:16 PM 1365 Views
Uhhh... - 22/01/2016 06:51:11 AM 1487 Views
Funny, I just saw this post - 17/09/2016 11:13:09 PM 1221 Views
The very first chapter (the Prologue) disproves this - 03/10/2016 06:56:28 AM 1238 Views
No it doesn't - 05/10/2016 12:47:03 AM 1138 Views
Re: Don't those two facts explain each other? - 08/10/2016 05:06:53 AM 1154 Views
Re: Yes, but that's not what I'm arguing... - 08/10/2016 04:52:06 AM 1297 Views

Reply to Message