The very first chapter (the Prologue) disproves this
fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 03/10/2016 06:56:28 AM
View original post
If someone can draw more than this much above their maximum it would seem odd given how many times we've heard about the dangers of overdrawing.
If someone can draw more than this much above their maximum it would seem odd given how many times we've heard about the dangers of overdrawing.
Why? You can overdraw as massively as you want. The constant thing is that you will either be burned out, or straight out die. The best evidence for this is Lews Therin, who, with no angreal or sa'angreal, overdrew enough to create a mountain taller than Everest.
From there, the rest of your argument collapses...
Gonna miss these discussions. Was fun to lay this to bed.
Angreal, Sa'angreal and Moiraine at 66
- 11/01/2016 08:53:23 AM
3621 Views
Uhhh...
- 12/01/2016 12:07:42 AM
1779 Views
Yet there are problems with either
- 15/01/2016 08:52:04 PM
1493 Views
Re: Yet there are problems with either
- 16/01/2016 05:29:11 AM
1901 Views
random thought on Shielding
- 19/01/2016 07:34:20 PM
1620 Views
You're forgetting the other side, though.
- 19/01/2016 08:19:59 PM
1698 Views
yes but it doesn't proactively do this
- 19/01/2016 10:06:25 PM
1548 Views
Responding to a shield doesn't require proactiveness
- 20/01/2016 05:53:24 AM
1470 Views
it's a visualization thing really
- 20/01/2016 04:39:08 PM
1507 Views
Not the crux of the debate...
- 21/01/2016 03:37:40 AM
1568 Views
Not really though
- 21/01/2016 05:00:34 PM
1352 Views
I always explained it as
- 21/01/2016 09:26:35 PM
1618 Views
There's not much to go on since all the shields except Berowyn's are the same
- 21/01/2016 09:55:14 PM
1492 Views
That's precisely my point
- 21/01/2016 10:09:02 PM
1556 Views
now you are speculating based on a lack of evidence
- 21/01/2016 10:39:13 PM
1441 Views
There's actual evidence:
- 22/01/2016 06:25:25 AM
1584 Views
what's dense here is that you keep putting in quotes that don't support your position
- 22/01/2016 03:28:16 PM
1779 Views
Whoa..
- 22/01/2016 04:24:19 PM
1614 Views
Not at all
- 22/01/2016 05:03:50 PM
1606 Views
Wonderful
- 22/01/2016 06:30:35 PM
1626 Views
yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this
- 22/01/2016 06:46:23 PM
1420 Views
Re: yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this
- 23/01/2016 02:35:33 PM
1826 Views
Hmmm....
- 23/01/2016 03:06:15 PM
1826 Views
Let me clear this up
- 25/01/2016 04:19:51 PM
1850 Views
Some more quotes
- 25/01/2016 05:10:51 PM
1605 Views
none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
- 25/01/2016 07:19:48 PM
1938 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
- 26/01/2016 03:45:52 AM
1583 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
- 26/01/2016 09:00:55 AM
1881 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
- 26/01/2016 10:39:49 AM
1632 Views
from the very beginning of this conversation I've been saying I'm theorizing
- 26/01/2016 04:09:19 PM
1525 Views
Yes, but that's not what I'm arguing...
- 16/01/2016 08:56:15 AM
1444 Views
But additive doesn't explain buffers and being able to overdraw
- 16/01/2016 03:02:33 PM
1482 Views
Don't those two facts explain each other?
- 16/01/2016 03:24:44 PM
1493 Views
It actually seems counterintuitive to me
- 19/01/2016 07:15:37 PM
1405 Views
Simple
- 19/01/2016 08:21:11 PM
1575 Views
Not at all
- 19/01/2016 10:17:39 PM
1356 Views
Huh?
- 20/01/2016 06:01:04 AM
1625 Views
agree to disagree I suppose ... I don't see it this way
*NM*
- 20/01/2016 04:41:16 PM
851 Views
*NM*
- 20/01/2016 04:41:16 PM
851 Views
I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. *NM*
- 21/01/2016 12:01:16 AM
793 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position.
- 21/01/2016 02:07:21 AM
1428 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position.
- 21/01/2016 03:32:59 AM
1500 Views
I don't necessarily think that's true
- 21/01/2016 05:07:40 PM
1559 Views
I don't see how magnifiers solve this
- 21/01/2016 10:01:17 PM
1491 Views
Re: I don't see how magnifiers solve this
- 21/01/2016 10:16:16 PM
1501 Views
Uhhh...
- 22/01/2016 06:51:11 AM
1628 Views
Funny, I just saw this post
- 17/09/2016 11:13:09 PM
1348 Views
The very first chapter (the Prologue) disproves this
- 03/10/2016 06:56:28 AM
1338 Views
