Active Users:1096 Time:07/08/2026 12:52:48 PM
The very first chapter (the Prologue) disproves this fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 03/10/2016 06:56:28 AM

View original post
If someone can draw more than this much above their maximum it would seem odd given how many times we've heard about the dangers of overdrawing.

Why? You can overdraw as massively as you want. The constant thing is that you will either be burned out, or straight out die. The best evidence for this is Lews Therin, who, with no angreal or sa'angreal, overdrew enough to create a mountain taller than Everest.

From there, the rest of your argument collapses...

Gonna miss these discussions. Was fun to lay this to bed.

Reply to message
Angreal, Sa'angreal and Moiraine at 66 - 11/01/2016 08:53:23 AM 3517 Views
Or we can choose to assume Elayne is incorrect - 11/01/2016 03:50:14 PM 1570 Views
Uhhh... - 12/01/2016 12:07:42 AM 1705 Views
Yet there are problems with either - 15/01/2016 08:52:04 PM 1433 Views
Re: Yet there are problems with either - 16/01/2016 05:29:11 AM 1830 Views
Would you consider... - 17/01/2016 09:06:59 AM 1481 Views
random thought on Shielding - 19/01/2016 07:34:20 PM 1556 Views
You're forgetting the other side, though. - 19/01/2016 08:19:59 PM 1644 Views
yes but it doesn't proactively do this - 19/01/2016 10:06:25 PM 1495 Views
Responding to a shield doesn't require proactiveness - 20/01/2016 05:53:24 AM 1414 Views
it's a visualization thing really - 20/01/2016 04:39:08 PM 1443 Views
Not the crux of the debate... - 21/01/2016 03:37:40 AM 1519 Views
Not really though - 21/01/2016 05:00:34 PM 1301 Views
I always explained it as - 21/01/2016 09:26:35 PM 1551 Views
There's not much to go on since all the shields except Berowyn's are the same - 21/01/2016 09:55:14 PM 1438 Views
That's precisely my point - 21/01/2016 10:09:02 PM 1507 Views
now you are speculating based on a lack of evidence - 21/01/2016 10:39:13 PM 1373 Views
There's actual evidence: - 22/01/2016 06:25:25 AM 1515 Views
what's dense here is that you keep putting in quotes that don't support your position - 22/01/2016 03:28:16 PM 1715 Views
Whoa.. - 22/01/2016 04:24:19 PM 1560 Views
Not at all - 22/01/2016 05:03:50 PM 1548 Views
Wonderful - 22/01/2016 06:30:35 PM 1571 Views
yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this - 22/01/2016 06:46:23 PM 1356 Views
Re: yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this - 23/01/2016 02:35:33 PM 1762 Views
Petty much *NM* - 24/01/2016 02:50:32 PM 802 Views
Hmmm.... - 23/01/2016 03:06:15 PM 1771 Views
Let me clear this up - 25/01/2016 04:19:51 PM 1797 Views
Some more quotes - 25/01/2016 05:10:51 PM 1546 Views
none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 25/01/2016 07:19:48 PM 1878 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 26/01/2016 03:45:52 AM 1515 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 26/01/2016 09:00:55 AM 1828 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 26/01/2016 10:39:49 AM 1525 Views
from the very beginning of this conversation I've been saying I'm theorizing - 26/01/2016 04:09:19 PM 1433 Views
Oh well then I agree with you - 26/01/2016 08:50:55 AM 1770 Views
thanks - 26/01/2016 04:26:46 PM 1773 Views
Yes, but that's not what I'm arguing... - 16/01/2016 08:56:15 AM 1357 Views
But additive doesn't explain buffers and being able to overdraw - 16/01/2016 03:02:33 PM 1417 Views
Don't those two facts explain each other? - 16/01/2016 03:24:44 PM 1425 Views
It actually seems counterintuitive to me - 19/01/2016 07:15:37 PM 1335 Views
Simple - 19/01/2016 08:21:11 PM 1518 Views
Not at all - 19/01/2016 10:17:39 PM 1290 Views
Huh? - 20/01/2016 06:01:04 AM 1547 Views
agree to disagree I suppose ... I don't see it this way *NM* - 20/01/2016 04:41:16 PM 823 Views
I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. *NM* - 21/01/2016 12:01:16 AM 763 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. - 21/01/2016 02:07:21 AM 1361 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. - 21/01/2016 03:32:59 AM 1425 Views
I don't necessarily think that's true - 21/01/2016 05:07:40 PM 1494 Views
I don't see how magnifiers solve this - 21/01/2016 10:01:17 PM 1441 Views
Re: I don't see how magnifiers solve this - 21/01/2016 10:16:16 PM 1428 Views
Uhhh... - 22/01/2016 06:51:11 AM 1565 Views
Funny, I just saw this post - 17/09/2016 11:13:09 PM 1279 Views
The very first chapter (the Prologue) disproves this - 03/10/2016 06:56:28 AM 1288 Views
No it doesn't - 05/10/2016 12:47:03 AM 1194 Views
Re: Don't those two facts explain each other? - 08/10/2016 05:06:53 AM 1233 Views
Re: Yes, but that's not what I'm arguing... - 08/10/2016 04:52:06 AM 1360 Views

Reply to Message