View original post
How can a fixed amount of Power be overdrawn upon?
How can a fixed amount of Power be overdrawn upon?
If an angreal offers 100 units of additive saidar how can someone draw 150 units through it?
The fixed amount is what the angreal adds. The overdrawing is all you. After all, you have no objection to that other fixed amount- a channeler's potential, being overdrawn upon, right?
Angreal, Sa'angreal and Moiraine at 66
- 11/01/2016 08:53:23 AM
2140 Views
Uhhh...
- 12/01/2016 12:07:42 AM
1133 Views
Yet there are problems with either
- 15/01/2016 08:52:04 PM
823 Views
Re: Yet there are problems with either
- 16/01/2016 05:29:11 AM
1083 Views
random thought on Shielding
- 19/01/2016 07:34:20 PM
1005 Views
You're forgetting the other side, though.
- 19/01/2016 08:19:59 PM
1068 Views
yes but it doesn't proactively do this
- 19/01/2016 10:06:25 PM
931 Views
Responding to a shield doesn't require proactiveness
- 20/01/2016 05:53:24 AM
826 Views
it's a visualization thing really
- 20/01/2016 04:39:08 PM
880 Views
Not the crux of the debate...
- 21/01/2016 03:37:40 AM
969 Views
Not really though
- 21/01/2016 05:00:34 PM
736 Views
I always explained it as
- 21/01/2016 09:26:35 PM
973 Views
There's not much to go on since all the shields except Berowyn's are the same
- 21/01/2016 09:55:14 PM
842 Views
That's precisely my point
- 21/01/2016 10:09:02 PM
985 Views
now you are speculating based on a lack of evidence
- 21/01/2016 10:39:13 PM
806 Views
There's actual evidence:
- 22/01/2016 06:25:25 AM
997 Views
what's dense here is that you keep putting in quotes that don't support your position
- 22/01/2016 03:28:16 PM
1116 Views
Whoa..
- 22/01/2016 04:24:19 PM
1067 Views
Not at all
- 22/01/2016 05:03:50 PM
1010 Views
Wonderful
- 22/01/2016 06:30:35 PM
986 Views
yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this
- 22/01/2016 06:46:23 PM
803 Views
Re: yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this
- 23/01/2016 02:35:33 PM
1102 Views
Hmmm....
- 23/01/2016 03:06:15 PM
1052 Views
Let me clear this up
- 25/01/2016 04:19:51 PM
1190 Views
Some more quotes
- 25/01/2016 05:10:51 PM
951 Views
none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
- 25/01/2016 07:19:48 PM
1242 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
- 26/01/2016 03:45:52 AM
1016 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
- 26/01/2016 09:00:55 AM
1160 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
- 26/01/2016 10:39:49 AM
948 Views
from the very beginning of this conversation I've been saying I'm theorizing
- 26/01/2016 04:09:19 PM
855 Views
Yes, but that's not what I'm arguing...
- 16/01/2016 08:56:15 AM
786 Views
But additive doesn't explain buffers and being able to overdraw
- 16/01/2016 03:02:33 PM
819 Views
Don't those two facts explain each other?
- 16/01/2016 03:24:44 PM
857 Views
It actually seems counterintuitive to me
- 19/01/2016 07:15:37 PM
802 Views
Simple
- 19/01/2016 08:21:11 PM
925 Views
Not at all
- 19/01/2016 10:17:39 PM
711 Views
Huh?
- 20/01/2016 06:01:04 AM
924 Views
agree to disagree I suppose ... I don't see it this way 
*NM*
- 20/01/2016 04:41:16 PM
500 Views
*NM*
- 20/01/2016 04:41:16 PM
500 Views
I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. *NM*
- 21/01/2016 12:01:16 AM
479 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position.
- 21/01/2016 02:07:21 AM
827 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position.
- 21/01/2016 03:32:59 AM
845 Views
I don't necessarily think that's true
- 21/01/2016 05:07:40 PM
921 Views
I don't see how magnifiers solve this
- 21/01/2016 10:01:17 PM
907 Views
Re: I don't see how magnifiers solve this
- 21/01/2016 10:16:16 PM
847 Views
Uhhh...
- 22/01/2016 06:51:11 AM
994 Views
Funny, I just saw this post
- 17/09/2016 11:13:09 PM
714 Views