That it's additive and multiplied?
i.e.
Angreal might give multiplier X2 on base plus some fixed amount? This would explain how stronger channelers get more, but also explain how someone weak would get a large benefit.
Angreal, Sa'angreal and Moiraine at 66
- 11/01/2016 08:53:23 AM
3387 Views
Uhhh...
- 12/01/2016 12:07:42 AM
1666 Views
Yet there are problems with either
- 15/01/2016 08:52:04 PM
1395 Views
Re: Yet there are problems with either
- 16/01/2016 05:29:11 AM
1793 Views
Would you consider...
- 17/01/2016 09:06:59 AM
1454 Views
random thought on Shielding
- 19/01/2016 07:34:20 PM
1526 Views
You're forgetting the other side, though.
- 19/01/2016 08:19:59 PM
1613 Views
yes but it doesn't proactively do this
- 19/01/2016 10:06:25 PM
1462 Views
Responding to a shield doesn't require proactiveness
- 20/01/2016 05:53:24 AM
1387 Views
it's a visualization thing really
- 20/01/2016 04:39:08 PM
1420 Views
Not the crux of the debate...
- 21/01/2016 03:37:40 AM
1497 Views
Not really though
- 21/01/2016 05:00:34 PM
1270 Views
I always explained it as
- 21/01/2016 09:26:35 PM
1516 Views
There's not much to go on since all the shields except Berowyn's are the same
- 21/01/2016 09:55:14 PM
1393 Views
That's precisely my point
- 21/01/2016 10:09:02 PM
1482 Views
now you are speculating based on a lack of evidence
- 21/01/2016 10:39:13 PM
1331 Views
There's actual evidence:
- 22/01/2016 06:25:25 AM
1481 Views
what's dense here is that you keep putting in quotes that don't support your position
- 22/01/2016 03:28:16 PM
1683 Views
Whoa..
- 22/01/2016 04:24:19 PM
1529 Views
Not at all
- 22/01/2016 05:03:50 PM
1506 Views
Wonderful
- 22/01/2016 06:30:35 PM
1545 Views
yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this
- 22/01/2016 06:46:23 PM
1323 Views
Re: yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this
- 23/01/2016 02:35:33 PM
1727 Views
Hmmm....
- 23/01/2016 03:06:15 PM
1743 Views
Let me clear this up
- 25/01/2016 04:19:51 PM
1766 Views
Some more quotes
- 25/01/2016 05:10:51 PM
1514 Views
none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
- 25/01/2016 07:19:48 PM
1848 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
- 26/01/2016 03:45:52 AM
1488 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
- 26/01/2016 09:00:55 AM
1801 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
- 26/01/2016 10:39:49 AM
1490 Views
from the very beginning of this conversation I've been saying I'm theorizing
- 26/01/2016 04:09:19 PM
1397 Views
Yes, but that's not what I'm arguing...
- 16/01/2016 08:56:15 AM
1324 Views
But additive doesn't explain buffers and being able to overdraw
- 16/01/2016 03:02:33 PM
1384 Views
Don't those two facts explain each other?
- 16/01/2016 03:24:44 PM
1388 Views
It actually seems counterintuitive to me
- 19/01/2016 07:15:37 PM
1313 Views
Simple
- 19/01/2016 08:21:11 PM
1463 Views
Not at all
- 19/01/2016 10:17:39 PM
1248 Views
Huh?
- 20/01/2016 06:01:04 AM
1510 Views
agree to disagree I suppose ... I don't see it this way 
*NM*
- 20/01/2016 04:41:16 PM
795 Views
*NM*
- 20/01/2016 04:41:16 PM
795 Views
I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. *NM*
- 21/01/2016 12:01:16 AM
743 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position.
- 21/01/2016 02:07:21 AM
1321 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position.
- 21/01/2016 03:32:59 AM
1384 Views
I don't necessarily think that's true
- 21/01/2016 05:07:40 PM
1452 Views
I don't see how magnifiers solve this
- 21/01/2016 10:01:17 PM
1411 Views
Re: I don't see how magnifiers solve this
- 21/01/2016 10:16:16 PM
1391 Views
Uhhh...
- 22/01/2016 06:51:11 AM
1520 Views
Funny, I just saw this post
- 17/09/2016 11:13:09 PM
1243 Views