That it's additive and multiplied?
i.e.
Angreal might give multiplier X2 on base plus some fixed amount? This would explain how stronger channelers get more, but also explain how someone weak would get a large benefit.
Angreal, Sa'angreal and Moiraine at 66
- 11/01/2016 08:53:23 AM
3570 Views
Uhhh...
- 12/01/2016 12:07:42 AM
1741 Views
Yet there are problems with either
- 15/01/2016 08:52:04 PM
1462 Views
Re: Yet there are problems with either
- 16/01/2016 05:29:11 AM
1863 Views
Would you consider...
- 17/01/2016 09:06:59 AM
1508 Views
random thought on Shielding
- 19/01/2016 07:34:20 PM
1584 Views
You're forgetting the other side, though.
- 19/01/2016 08:19:59 PM
1674 Views
yes but it doesn't proactively do this
- 19/01/2016 10:06:25 PM
1521 Views
Responding to a shield doesn't require proactiveness
- 20/01/2016 05:53:24 AM
1437 Views
it's a visualization thing really
- 20/01/2016 04:39:08 PM
1470 Views
Not the crux of the debate...
- 21/01/2016 03:37:40 AM
1542 Views
Not really though
- 21/01/2016 05:00:34 PM
1325 Views
I always explained it as
- 21/01/2016 09:26:35 PM
1575 Views
There's not much to go on since all the shields except Berowyn's are the same
- 21/01/2016 09:55:14 PM
1467 Views
That's precisely my point
- 21/01/2016 10:09:02 PM
1527 Views
now you are speculating based on a lack of evidence
- 21/01/2016 10:39:13 PM
1404 Views
There's actual evidence:
- 22/01/2016 06:25:25 AM
1554 Views
what's dense here is that you keep putting in quotes that don't support your position
- 22/01/2016 03:28:16 PM
1744 Views
Whoa..
- 22/01/2016 04:24:19 PM
1582 Views
Not at all
- 22/01/2016 05:03:50 PM
1579 Views
Wonderful
- 22/01/2016 06:30:35 PM
1590 Views
yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this
- 22/01/2016 06:46:23 PM
1387 Views
Re: yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this
- 23/01/2016 02:35:33 PM
1799 Views
Hmmm....
- 23/01/2016 03:06:15 PM
1792 Views
Let me clear this up
- 25/01/2016 04:19:51 PM
1820 Views
Some more quotes
- 25/01/2016 05:10:51 PM
1566 Views
none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
- 25/01/2016 07:19:48 PM
1909 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
- 26/01/2016 03:45:52 AM
1551 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
- 26/01/2016 09:00:55 AM
1851 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
- 26/01/2016 10:39:49 AM
1555 Views
from the very beginning of this conversation I've been saying I'm theorizing
- 26/01/2016 04:09:19 PM
1463 Views
Yes, but that's not what I'm arguing...
- 16/01/2016 08:56:15 AM
1401 Views
But additive doesn't explain buffers and being able to overdraw
- 16/01/2016 03:02:33 PM
1449 Views
Don't those two facts explain each other?
- 16/01/2016 03:24:44 PM
1457 Views
It actually seems counterintuitive to me
- 19/01/2016 07:15:37 PM
1374 Views
Simple
- 19/01/2016 08:21:11 PM
1543 Views
Not at all
- 19/01/2016 10:17:39 PM
1321 Views
Huh?
- 20/01/2016 06:01:04 AM
1581 Views
agree to disagree I suppose ... I don't see it this way 
*NM*
- 20/01/2016 04:41:16 PM
837 Views
*NM*
- 20/01/2016 04:41:16 PM
837 Views
I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. *NM*
- 21/01/2016 12:01:16 AM
776 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position.
- 21/01/2016 02:07:21 AM
1397 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position.
- 21/01/2016 03:32:59 AM
1455 Views
I don't necessarily think that's true
- 21/01/2016 05:07:40 PM
1522 Views
I don't see how magnifiers solve this
- 21/01/2016 10:01:17 PM
1460 Views
Re: I don't see how magnifiers solve this
- 21/01/2016 10:16:16 PM
1454 Views
Uhhh...
- 22/01/2016 06:51:11 AM
1592 Views
Funny, I just saw this post
- 17/09/2016 11:13:09 PM
1307 Views