I don't think you can say the Aes Sedai shielding is only male optimized. Nynaeve used a typical AS shield against Moghedien, and Moggy's shield was no different. Nynaeve didn't comment on it. Similarly, no one thought Moggy's shield on Liandrin was different. Only the knot, which was made immensely complex.
Moghedien shielded Nyn in TAR, and she tried to break free and it was a solid wall, no flex reported.
Angreal, Sa'angreal and Moiraine at 66
- 11/01/2016 08:53:23 AM
3270 Views
Uhhh...
- 12/01/2016 12:07:42 AM
1618 Views
Yet there are problems with either
- 15/01/2016 08:52:04 PM
1349 Views
Re: Yet there are problems with either
- 16/01/2016 05:29:11 AM
1737 Views
random thought on Shielding
- 19/01/2016 07:34:20 PM
1469 Views
You're forgetting the other side, though.
- 19/01/2016 08:19:59 PM
1558 Views
yes but it doesn't proactively do this
- 19/01/2016 10:06:25 PM
1407 Views
Responding to a shield doesn't require proactiveness
- 20/01/2016 05:53:24 AM
1334 Views
it's a visualization thing really
- 20/01/2016 04:39:08 PM
1366 Views
Not the crux of the debate...
- 21/01/2016 03:37:40 AM
1453 Views
Not really though
- 21/01/2016 05:00:34 PM
1214 Views
I always explained it as
- 21/01/2016 09:26:35 PM
1468 Views
There's not much to go on since all the shields except Berowyn's are the same
- 21/01/2016 09:55:14 PM
1325 Views
That's precisely my point
- 21/01/2016 10:09:02 PM
1434 Views
now you are speculating based on a lack of evidence
- 21/01/2016 10:39:13 PM
1289 Views
There's actual evidence:
- 22/01/2016 06:25:25 AM
1439 Views
what's dense here is that you keep putting in quotes that don't support your position
- 22/01/2016 03:28:16 PM
1635 Views
Whoa..
- 22/01/2016 04:24:19 PM
1496 Views
Not at all
- 22/01/2016 05:03:50 PM
1463 Views
Wonderful
- 22/01/2016 06:30:35 PM
1479 Views
yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this
- 22/01/2016 06:46:23 PM
1271 Views
Re: yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this
- 23/01/2016 02:35:33 PM
1688 Views
Hmmm....
- 23/01/2016 03:06:15 PM
1688 Views
Let me clear this up
- 25/01/2016 04:19:51 PM
1714 Views
Some more quotes
- 25/01/2016 05:10:51 PM
1466 Views
none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
- 25/01/2016 07:19:48 PM
1815 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
- 26/01/2016 03:45:52 AM
1441 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
- 26/01/2016 09:00:55 AM
1757 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
- 26/01/2016 10:39:49 AM
1436 Views
from the very beginning of this conversation I've been saying I'm theorizing
- 26/01/2016 04:09:19 PM
1346 Views
Yes, but that's not what I'm arguing...
- 16/01/2016 08:56:15 AM
1281 Views
But additive doesn't explain buffers and being able to overdraw
- 16/01/2016 03:02:33 PM
1336 Views
Don't those two facts explain each other?
- 16/01/2016 03:24:44 PM
1335 Views
It actually seems counterintuitive to me
- 19/01/2016 07:15:37 PM
1266 Views
Simple
- 19/01/2016 08:21:11 PM
1387 Views
Not at all
- 19/01/2016 10:17:39 PM
1193 Views
Huh?
- 20/01/2016 06:01:04 AM
1458 Views
agree to disagree I suppose ... I don't see it this way
*NM*
- 20/01/2016 04:41:16 PM
770 Views
*NM*
- 20/01/2016 04:41:16 PM
770 Views
I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. *NM*
- 21/01/2016 12:01:16 AM
725 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position.
- 21/01/2016 02:07:21 AM
1277 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position.
- 21/01/2016 03:32:59 AM
1332 Views
I don't necessarily think that's true
- 21/01/2016 05:07:40 PM
1393 Views
I don't see how magnifiers solve this
- 21/01/2016 10:01:17 PM
1367 Views
Re: I don't see how magnifiers solve this
- 21/01/2016 10:16:16 PM
1344 Views
Uhhh...
- 22/01/2016 06:51:11 AM
1463 Views
Funny, I just saw this post
- 17/09/2016 11:13:09 PM
1195 Views
