Active Users:699 Time:30/12/2025 01:53:54 PM
Hmmm.... Sidious Send a noteboard - 23/01/2016 03:06:15 PM

I think Fionwe might be right on this one, if I've read the debate correctly.

It seems like all shields are the same in the series. Lanfear calls a shield a shield, and if there is any weave that passed down through the ages it would be that. Shields are always described in the same way - if they are very strong then the person describes them as a glass wall, and if they are weaker they bend.

The quote with Liandrin/Moghedien clearly represents the knot. The fact that Liandrin can identify it as a shield implies that shields are the same. We have seen Nynaeve unable to decipher what Moghedien is weaving as a counter example. We've also seen SH remove the Source from the FS, and they know it's not shielding.

Liandrin then goes on saying that the complexity of the knot is horrific and she loses sight of it. Moghedien says only the FS can unravel it - it's clearly about the knot and the not the technique. We've seen Osan'gar I think say that he could unravel any shield with time, so that goes against the technique and more about the knot being the way past shielding.

If you sharpen the edges of the shield you sever the person. That much is made clear with Nynaeve's duel with Moghedien. We also know that Asmodean severed his mother so it's likely Nynaeve's claim about this subject is not dubious and it can be done by an individual.

Berowin says that she has 'honed her skills over time'. I think she does the exact opposite. I think she makes her weaves blunt and soft, and they bend like elastic bands. It is similar to Rand encountering soft spots when the AS held him and him saying that they can't be broken. This of course takes time and practice to master.

If Berowin tied off her shield then Rand would probably be able to break it, but only by unravelling the knot. Her weave per se is invincible due to its durability. Moghedien's trick would not work on Rand or other educated channelers. You can unravel a horrible knot, it just takes time. Heaven knows how long - maybe Rand would need hours or days on Liandrin's weave? This is obviously why Rand didn't shield Semirhage and perform a complex knot - he knows she'll eventually escape.

Lanfear's shield on Asmodean is a partial shield. It's identical to hiding your ability and partially hiding your ability like Mesaana did, in a way. His shield is probably difficult to break because he can't cause that gradient between himself and the True Source, and as she said, there is obviously some pain involved, though I'm not sure what this is because we've never seen similar 'pain'. It's possible he needs to try and draw his maximum but because of the partial shield it feels like overdrawing, and thus the extreme pain of overdrawing. The shield will eventually buckle but he won't subject himself to this. It's also likely she lied about the shield dissipating.

It seems like there are only two real types of shields in the story - shields for men and women. Rand himself said he couldn't remember how to shield a woman, so the technique is probably different. If you sharpen the edges with skill or a circle you can sever someone.

Wheel of Time board admin
Fan of Lanfear
Reply to message
Angreal, Sa'angreal and Moiraine at 66 - 11/01/2016 08:53:23 AM 3095 Views
Or we can choose to assume Elayne is incorrect - 11/01/2016 03:50:14 PM 1423 Views
Uhhh... - 12/01/2016 12:07:42 AM 1557 Views
Yet there are problems with either - 15/01/2016 08:52:04 PM 1281 Views
Re: Yet there are problems with either - 16/01/2016 05:29:11 AM 1666 Views
Would you consider... - 17/01/2016 09:06:59 AM 1346 Views
random thought on Shielding - 19/01/2016 07:34:20 PM 1417 Views
You're forgetting the other side, though. - 19/01/2016 08:19:59 PM 1509 Views
yes but it doesn't proactively do this - 19/01/2016 10:06:25 PM 1353 Views
Responding to a shield doesn't require proactiveness - 20/01/2016 05:53:24 AM 1278 Views
it's a visualization thing really - 20/01/2016 04:39:08 PM 1314 Views
Not the crux of the debate... - 21/01/2016 03:37:40 AM 1392 Views
Not really though - 21/01/2016 05:00:34 PM 1147 Views
I always explained it as - 21/01/2016 09:26:35 PM 1419 Views
There's not much to go on since all the shields except Berowyn's are the same - 21/01/2016 09:55:14 PM 1271 Views
That's precisely my point - 21/01/2016 10:09:02 PM 1379 Views
now you are speculating based on a lack of evidence - 21/01/2016 10:39:13 PM 1229 Views
There's actual evidence: - 22/01/2016 06:25:25 AM 1384 Views
what's dense here is that you keep putting in quotes that don't support your position - 22/01/2016 03:28:16 PM 1576 Views
Whoa.. - 22/01/2016 04:24:19 PM 1448 Views
Not at all - 22/01/2016 05:03:50 PM 1398 Views
Wonderful - 22/01/2016 06:30:35 PM 1385 Views
yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this - 22/01/2016 06:46:23 PM 1217 Views
Re: yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this - 23/01/2016 02:35:33 PM 1625 Views
Petty much *NM* - 24/01/2016 02:50:32 PM 736 Views
Hmmm.... - 23/01/2016 03:06:15 PM 1624 Views
Let me clear this up - 25/01/2016 04:19:51 PM 1656 Views
Some more quotes - 25/01/2016 05:10:51 PM 1413 Views
none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 25/01/2016 07:19:48 PM 1751 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 26/01/2016 03:45:52 AM 1391 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 26/01/2016 09:00:55 AM 1700 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 26/01/2016 10:39:49 AM 1381 Views
from the very beginning of this conversation I've been saying I'm theorizing - 26/01/2016 04:09:19 PM 1289 Views
Oh well then I agree with you - 26/01/2016 08:50:55 AM 1618 Views
thanks - 26/01/2016 04:26:46 PM 1643 Views
Yes, but that's not what I'm arguing... - 16/01/2016 08:56:15 AM 1217 Views
But additive doesn't explain buffers and being able to overdraw - 16/01/2016 03:02:33 PM 1273 Views
Don't those two facts explain each other? - 16/01/2016 03:24:44 PM 1274 Views
It actually seems counterintuitive to me - 19/01/2016 07:15:37 PM 1214 Views
Simple - 19/01/2016 08:21:11 PM 1330 Views
Not at all - 19/01/2016 10:17:39 PM 1129 Views
Huh? - 20/01/2016 06:01:04 AM 1397 Views
agree to disagree I suppose ... I don't see it this way *NM* - 20/01/2016 04:41:16 PM 738 Views
I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. *NM* - 21/01/2016 12:01:16 AM 699 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. - 21/01/2016 02:07:21 AM 1233 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. - 21/01/2016 03:32:59 AM 1281 Views
I don't necessarily think that's true - 21/01/2016 05:07:40 PM 1342 Views
I don't see how magnifiers solve this - 21/01/2016 10:01:17 PM 1321 Views
Re: I don't see how magnifiers solve this - 21/01/2016 10:16:16 PM 1281 Views
Uhhh... - 22/01/2016 06:51:11 AM 1401 Views
Funny, I just saw this post - 17/09/2016 11:13:09 PM 1139 Views
The very first chapter (the Prologue) disproves this - 03/10/2016 06:56:28 AM 1175 Views
No it doesn't - 05/10/2016 12:47:03 AM 1068 Views
Re: Don't those two facts explain each other? - 08/10/2016 05:06:53 AM 1067 Views
Re: Yes, but that's not what I'm arguing... - 08/10/2016 04:52:06 AM 1215 Views

Reply to Message