Active Users:1533 Time:23/10/2025 01:17:48 PM
Oh well then I agree with you Sidious Send a noteboard - 26/01/2016 08:50:55 AM

Berowin directly says in her quote that her secret is practice. She's probably good with Spirit but she's clearly a woman who has spent decades playing with this weave and making it more efficient. It's possible that many different shields are possible. I don't think anyone, including the Forsaken, have taken the time to practice shielding to that degree but they do perhaps know of ways to weave stronger lattices that exceed Aes Sedai shields. We know from Elayne that practicing with Air made her very powerful with it, and Leane/Suian learned to work more efficiently with less saidar. Demandred said that he's had so much time to study war and dueling that no mortal man can match him, so there's a general theme of practice making perfect. It likely extends to the Power too.

Berowin probably found something new... A soft shield that bends. I suspect the standard weave is like a net made of rope and that perhaps some AOL individuals know how to weave shields made of metal wire. This is why Osan'gar says he can get around any shield.... The knot is where the flaw lies.

I think your theory is original and explains many shielding dilemmas in the series.

Wheel of Time board admin
Fan of Lanfear
Reply to message
Angreal, Sa'angreal and Moiraine at 66 - 11/01/2016 08:53:23 AM 2949 Views
Or we can choose to assume Elayne is incorrect - 11/01/2016 03:50:14 PM 1354 Views
Uhhh... - 12/01/2016 12:07:42 AM 1497 Views
Yet there are problems with either - 15/01/2016 08:52:04 PM 1209 Views
Re: Yet there are problems with either - 16/01/2016 05:29:11 AM 1605 Views
Would you consider... - 17/01/2016 09:06:59 AM 1303 Views
random thought on Shielding - 19/01/2016 07:34:20 PM 1351 Views
You're forgetting the other side, though. - 19/01/2016 08:19:59 PM 1435 Views
yes but it doesn't proactively do this - 19/01/2016 10:06:25 PM 1304 Views
Responding to a shield doesn't require proactiveness - 20/01/2016 05:53:24 AM 1219 Views
it's a visualization thing really - 20/01/2016 04:39:08 PM 1242 Views
Not the crux of the debate... - 21/01/2016 03:37:40 AM 1336 Views
Not really though - 21/01/2016 05:00:34 PM 1091 Views
I always explained it as - 21/01/2016 09:26:35 PM 1358 Views
There's not much to go on since all the shields except Berowyn's are the same - 21/01/2016 09:55:14 PM 1225 Views
That's precisely my point - 21/01/2016 10:09:02 PM 1304 Views
now you are speculating based on a lack of evidence - 21/01/2016 10:39:13 PM 1164 Views
There's actual evidence: - 22/01/2016 06:25:25 AM 1333 Views
what's dense here is that you keep putting in quotes that don't support your position - 22/01/2016 03:28:16 PM 1505 Views
Whoa.. - 22/01/2016 04:24:19 PM 1404 Views
Not at all - 22/01/2016 05:03:50 PM 1358 Views
Wonderful - 22/01/2016 06:30:35 PM 1341 Views
yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this - 22/01/2016 06:46:23 PM 1155 Views
Re: yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this - 23/01/2016 02:35:33 PM 1572 Views
Petty much *NM* - 24/01/2016 02:50:32 PM 712 Views
Hmmm.... - 23/01/2016 03:06:15 PM 1557 Views
Let me clear this up - 25/01/2016 04:19:51 PM 1588 Views
Some more quotes - 25/01/2016 05:10:51 PM 1349 Views
none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 25/01/2016 07:19:48 PM 1684 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 26/01/2016 03:45:52 AM 1336 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 26/01/2016 09:00:55 AM 1644 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 26/01/2016 10:39:49 AM 1329 Views
from the very beginning of this conversation I've been saying I'm theorizing - 26/01/2016 04:09:19 PM 1231 Views
Oh well then I agree with you - 26/01/2016 08:50:55 AM 1544 Views
thanks - 26/01/2016 04:26:46 PM 1585 Views
Yes, but that's not what I'm arguing... - 16/01/2016 08:56:15 AM 1152 Views
But additive doesn't explain buffers and being able to overdraw - 16/01/2016 03:02:33 PM 1209 Views
Don't those two facts explain each other? - 16/01/2016 03:24:44 PM 1213 Views
It actually seems counterintuitive to me - 19/01/2016 07:15:37 PM 1147 Views
Simple - 19/01/2016 08:21:11 PM 1270 Views
Not at all - 19/01/2016 10:17:39 PM 1079 Views
Huh? - 20/01/2016 06:01:04 AM 1335 Views
agree to disagree I suppose ... I don't see it this way *NM* - 20/01/2016 04:41:16 PM 699 Views
I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. *NM* - 21/01/2016 12:01:16 AM 663 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. - 21/01/2016 02:07:21 AM 1177 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. - 21/01/2016 03:32:59 AM 1225 Views
I don't necessarily think that's true - 21/01/2016 05:07:40 PM 1283 Views
I don't see how magnifiers solve this - 21/01/2016 10:01:17 PM 1245 Views
Re: I don't see how magnifiers solve this - 21/01/2016 10:16:16 PM 1224 Views
Uhhh... - 22/01/2016 06:51:11 AM 1344 Views
Funny, I just saw this post - 17/09/2016 11:13:09 PM 1089 Views
The very first chapter (the Prologue) disproves this - 03/10/2016 06:56:28 AM 1120 Views
No it doesn't - 05/10/2016 12:47:03 AM 1017 Views
Re: Don't those two facts explain each other? - 08/10/2016 05:06:53 AM 1011 Views
Re: Yes, but that's not what I'm arguing... - 08/10/2016 04:52:06 AM 1166 Views

Reply to Message