Active Users:886 Time:31/01/2026 08:00:03 PM
thanks darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 26/01/2016 04:26:46 PM

View original post

Berowin directly says in her quote that her secret is practice. She's probably good with Spirit but she's clearly a woman who has spent decades playing with this weave and making it more efficient. It's possible that many different shields are possible. I don't think anyone, including the Forsaken, have taken the time to practice shielding to that degree but they do perhaps know of ways to weave stronger lattices that exceed Aes Sedai shields. We know from Elayne that practicing with Air made her very powerful with it, and Leane/Suian learned to work more efficiently with less saidar. Demandred said that he's had so much time to study war and dueling that no mortal man can match him, so there's a general theme of practice making perfect. It likely extends to the Power too.

Berowin probably found something new... A soft shield that bends. I suspect the standard weave is like a net made of rope and that perhaps some AOL individuals know how to weave shields made of metal wire. This is why Osan'gar says he can get around any shield.... The knot is where the flaw lies.

I think your theory is original and explains many shielding dilemmas in the series.


I suspect that like nearly everything else from the AoL, Shielding probably was something that was taught in a way that made the individual as effective as they could be with the weaves available. Perhaps there were shield weaves that incorporated other (or even all) flows of the Power that allowed for those weaker in Spirit to still be effective at shielding. I could see how earth, air or water could help strengthen a shield and how fire could assist with cutting off someone already holding the source. I always felt like AoL training incorporated assessing an individual's flow strength and weaves were taught that would maximize said individual's effectiveness with any given area of OP use. Thus a man very weak in Spirit might still be able to shield if he as taught a weave that incorporated fire or earth.

IMO this plays into the Aes Sedai losing so much knowledge. Eventually training was made into a "one-size-fits-all" class which eventually lent itself to only those with the strongest potential or an obvious Talent could excel and effectively perform the specific weaves required to become Aes Sedai. Modern Aes Sedai seem to only know one or two weaves for any given effect and those who are weak simply accept that they cannot move forward with these weaves.

Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
Reply to message
Angreal, Sa'angreal and Moiraine at 66 - 11/01/2016 08:53:23 AM 3162 Views
Or we can choose to assume Elayne is incorrect - 11/01/2016 03:50:14 PM 1456 Views
Uhhh... - 12/01/2016 12:07:42 AM 1577 Views
Yet there are problems with either - 15/01/2016 08:52:04 PM 1308 Views
Re: Yet there are problems with either - 16/01/2016 05:29:11 AM 1696 Views
Would you consider... - 17/01/2016 09:06:59 AM 1373 Views
random thought on Shielding - 19/01/2016 07:34:20 PM 1439 Views
You're forgetting the other side, though. - 19/01/2016 08:19:59 PM 1529 Views
yes but it doesn't proactively do this - 19/01/2016 10:06:25 PM 1370 Views
Responding to a shield doesn't require proactiveness - 20/01/2016 05:53:24 AM 1299 Views
it's a visualization thing really - 20/01/2016 04:39:08 PM 1333 Views
Not the crux of the debate... - 21/01/2016 03:37:40 AM 1413 Views
Not really though - 21/01/2016 05:00:34 PM 1184 Views
I always explained it as - 21/01/2016 09:26:35 PM 1432 Views
There's not much to go on since all the shields except Berowyn's are the same - 21/01/2016 09:55:14 PM 1290 Views
That's precisely my point - 21/01/2016 10:09:02 PM 1403 Views
now you are speculating based on a lack of evidence - 21/01/2016 10:39:13 PM 1252 Views
There's actual evidence: - 22/01/2016 06:25:25 AM 1403 Views
what's dense here is that you keep putting in quotes that don't support your position - 22/01/2016 03:28:16 PM 1596 Views
Whoa.. - 22/01/2016 04:24:19 PM 1463 Views
Not at all - 22/01/2016 05:03:50 PM 1422 Views
Wonderful - 22/01/2016 06:30:35 PM 1413 Views
yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this - 22/01/2016 06:46:23 PM 1240 Views
Re: yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this - 23/01/2016 02:35:33 PM 1642 Views
Petty much *NM* - 24/01/2016 02:50:32 PM 739 Views
Hmmm.... - 23/01/2016 03:06:15 PM 1646 Views
Let me clear this up - 25/01/2016 04:19:51 PM 1676 Views
Some more quotes - 25/01/2016 05:10:51 PM 1427 Views
none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 25/01/2016 07:19:48 PM 1777 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 26/01/2016 03:45:52 AM 1405 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 26/01/2016 09:00:55 AM 1722 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 26/01/2016 10:39:49 AM 1399 Views
from the very beginning of this conversation I've been saying I'm theorizing - 26/01/2016 04:09:19 PM 1309 Views
Oh well then I agree with you - 26/01/2016 08:50:55 AM 1644 Views
thanks - 26/01/2016 04:26:46 PM 1662 Views
Yes, but that's not what I'm arguing... - 16/01/2016 08:56:15 AM 1243 Views
But additive doesn't explain buffers and being able to overdraw - 16/01/2016 03:02:33 PM 1296 Views
Don't those two facts explain each other? - 16/01/2016 03:24:44 PM 1296 Views
It actually seems counterintuitive to me - 19/01/2016 07:15:37 PM 1233 Views
Simple - 19/01/2016 08:21:11 PM 1348 Views
Not at all - 19/01/2016 10:17:39 PM 1153 Views
Huh? - 20/01/2016 06:01:04 AM 1420 Views
agree to disagree I suppose ... I don't see it this way *NM* - 20/01/2016 04:41:16 PM 751 Views
I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. *NM* - 21/01/2016 12:01:16 AM 708 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. - 21/01/2016 02:07:21 AM 1248 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. - 21/01/2016 03:32:59 AM 1294 Views
I don't necessarily think that's true - 21/01/2016 05:07:40 PM 1362 Views
I don't see how magnifiers solve this - 21/01/2016 10:01:17 PM 1337 Views
Re: I don't see how magnifiers solve this - 21/01/2016 10:16:16 PM 1297 Views
Uhhh... - 22/01/2016 06:51:11 AM 1418 Views
Funny, I just saw this post - 17/09/2016 11:13:09 PM 1163 Views
The very first chapter (the Prologue) disproves this - 03/10/2016 06:56:28 AM 1189 Views
No it doesn't - 05/10/2016 12:47:03 AM 1079 Views
Re: Don't those two facts explain each other? - 08/10/2016 05:06:53 AM 1089 Views
Re: Yes, but that's not what I'm arguing... - 08/10/2016 04:52:06 AM 1239 Views

Reply to Message