The very first chapter (the Prologue) disproves this
fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 03/10/2016 06:56:28 AM
View original post
If someone can draw more than this much above their maximum it would seem odd given how many times we've heard about the dangers of overdrawing.
If someone can draw more than this much above their maximum it would seem odd given how many times we've heard about the dangers of overdrawing.
Why? You can overdraw as massively as you want. The constant thing is that you will either be burned out, or straight out die. The best evidence for this is Lews Therin, who, with no angreal or sa'angreal, overdrew enough to create a mountain taller than Everest.
From there, the rest of your argument collapses...
Gonna miss these discussions. Was fun to lay this to bed.
Angreal, Sa'angreal and Moiraine at 66
11/01/2016 08:53:23 AM
- 2854 Views
Uhhh...
12/01/2016 12:07:42 AM
- 1445 Views
Yet there are problems with either
15/01/2016 08:52:04 PM
- 1149 Views
Re: Yet there are problems with either
16/01/2016 05:29:11 AM
- 1548 Views
random thought on Shielding
19/01/2016 07:34:20 PM
- 1306 Views
You're forgetting the other side, though.
19/01/2016 08:19:59 PM
- 1386 Views
yes but it doesn't proactively do this
19/01/2016 10:06:25 PM
- 1236 Views
Responding to a shield doesn't require proactiveness
20/01/2016 05:53:24 AM
- 1157 Views
it's a visualization thing really
20/01/2016 04:39:08 PM
- 1198 Views
Not the crux of the debate...
21/01/2016 03:37:40 AM
- 1282 Views
Not really though
21/01/2016 05:00:34 PM
- 1048 Views
I always explained it as
21/01/2016 09:26:35 PM
- 1288 Views
There's not much to go on since all the shields except Berowyn's are the same
21/01/2016 09:55:14 PM
- 1180 Views
That's precisely my point
21/01/2016 10:09:02 PM
- 1264 Views
now you are speculating based on a lack of evidence
21/01/2016 10:39:13 PM
- 1094 Views
There's actual evidence:
22/01/2016 06:25:25 AM
- 1281 Views
what's dense here is that you keep putting in quotes that don't support your position
22/01/2016 03:28:16 PM
- 1450 Views
Whoa..
22/01/2016 04:24:19 PM
- 1357 Views
Not at all
22/01/2016 05:03:50 PM
- 1317 Views
Wonderful
22/01/2016 06:30:35 PM
- 1298 Views
yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this
22/01/2016 06:46:23 PM
- 1112 Views
Re: yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this
23/01/2016 02:35:33 PM
- 1526 Views
Hmmm....
23/01/2016 03:06:15 PM
- 1492 Views
Let me clear this up
25/01/2016 04:19:51 PM
- 1538 Views
Some more quotes
25/01/2016 05:10:51 PM
- 1289 Views
none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
25/01/2016 07:19:48 PM
- 1624 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
26/01/2016 03:45:52 AM
- 1302 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
26/01/2016 09:00:55 AM
- 1606 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
26/01/2016 10:39:49 AM
- 1279 Views
from the very beginning of this conversation I've been saying I'm theorizing
26/01/2016 04:09:19 PM
- 1173 Views
Yes, but that's not what I'm arguing...
16/01/2016 08:56:15 AM
- 1101 Views
But additive doesn't explain buffers and being able to overdraw
16/01/2016 03:02:33 PM
- 1144 Views
Don't those two facts explain each other?
16/01/2016 03:24:44 PM
- 1156 Views
It actually seems counterintuitive to me
19/01/2016 07:15:37 PM
- 1102 Views
Simple
19/01/2016 08:21:11 PM
- 1228 Views
Not at all
19/01/2016 10:17:39 PM
- 1016 Views
Huh?
20/01/2016 06:01:04 AM
- 1265 Views
agree to disagree I suppose ... I don't see it this way
*NM*
20/01/2016 04:41:16 PM
- 677 Views

I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. *NM*
21/01/2016 12:01:16 AM
- 640 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position.
21/01/2016 02:07:21 AM
- 1117 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position.
21/01/2016 03:32:59 AM
- 1167 Views
I don't necessarily think that's true
21/01/2016 05:07:40 PM
- 1233 Views
I don't see how magnifiers solve this
21/01/2016 10:01:17 PM
- 1196 Views
Re: I don't see how magnifiers solve this
21/01/2016 10:16:16 PM
- 1147 Views
Uhhh...
22/01/2016 06:51:11 AM
- 1300 Views
Funny, I just saw this post
17/09/2016 11:13:09 PM
- 1031 Views
The very first chapter (the Prologue) disproves this
03/10/2016 06:56:28 AM
- 1071 Views