Active Users:386 Time:30/04/2025 02:52:25 PM
The very first chapter (the Prologue) disproves this fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 03/10/2016 06:56:28 AM

View original post
If someone can draw more than this much above their maximum it would seem odd given how many times we've heard about the dangers of overdrawing.

Why? You can overdraw as massively as you want. The constant thing is that you will either be burned out, or straight out die. The best evidence for this is Lews Therin, who, with no angreal or sa'angreal, overdrew enough to create a mountain taller than Everest.

From there, the rest of your argument collapses...

Gonna miss these discussions. Was fun to lay this to bed.

Reply to message
Angreal, Sa'angreal and Moiraine at 66 - 11/01/2016 08:53:23 AM 2477 Views
Or we can choose to assume Elayne is incorrect - 11/01/2016 03:50:14 PM 1163 Views
Uhhh... - 12/01/2016 12:07:42 AM 1308 Views
Yet there are problems with either - 15/01/2016 08:52:04 PM 1014 Views
Re: Yet there are problems with either - 16/01/2016 05:29:11 AM 1268 Views
Would you consider... - 17/01/2016 09:06:59 AM 1117 Views
random thought on Shielding - 19/01/2016 07:34:20 PM 1149 Views
You're forgetting the other side, though. - 19/01/2016 08:19:59 PM 1244 Views
yes but it doesn't proactively do this - 19/01/2016 10:06:25 PM 1094 Views
Responding to a shield doesn't require proactiveness - 20/01/2016 05:53:24 AM 1010 Views
it's a visualization thing really - 20/01/2016 04:39:08 PM 1057 Views
Not the crux of the debate... - 21/01/2016 03:37:40 AM 1109 Views
Not really though - 21/01/2016 05:00:34 PM 915 Views
I always explained it as - 21/01/2016 09:26:35 PM 1139 Views
There's not much to go on since all the shields except Berowyn's are the same - 21/01/2016 09:55:14 PM 1030 Views
That's precisely my point - 21/01/2016 10:09:02 PM 1118 Views
now you are speculating based on a lack of evidence - 21/01/2016 10:39:13 PM 961 Views
There's actual evidence: - 22/01/2016 06:25:25 AM 1129 Views
what's dense here is that you keep putting in quotes that don't support your position - 22/01/2016 03:28:16 PM 1294 Views
Whoa.. - 22/01/2016 04:24:19 PM 1211 Views
Not at all - 22/01/2016 05:03:50 PM 1176 Views
Wonderful - 22/01/2016 06:30:35 PM 1162 Views
yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this - 22/01/2016 06:46:23 PM 977 Views
Re: yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this - 23/01/2016 02:35:33 PM 1256 Views
Petty much *NM* - 24/01/2016 02:50:32 PM 547 Views
Hmmm.... - 23/01/2016 03:06:15 PM 1219 Views
Let me clear this up - 25/01/2016 04:19:51 PM 1359 Views
Some more quotes - 25/01/2016 05:10:51 PM 1139 Views
none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 25/01/2016 07:19:48 PM 1417 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 26/01/2016 03:45:52 AM 1154 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 26/01/2016 09:00:55 AM 1333 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 26/01/2016 10:39:49 AM 1124 Views
from the very beginning of this conversation I've been saying I'm theorizing - 26/01/2016 04:09:19 PM 1036 Views
Oh well then I agree with you - 26/01/2016 08:50:55 AM 1211 Views
thanks - 26/01/2016 04:26:46 PM 1399 Views
Yes, but that's not what I'm arguing... - 16/01/2016 08:56:15 AM 961 Views
But additive doesn't explain buffers and being able to overdraw - 16/01/2016 03:02:33 PM 983 Views
Don't those two facts explain each other? - 16/01/2016 03:24:44 PM 1027 Views
It actually seems counterintuitive to me - 19/01/2016 07:15:37 PM 981 Views
Simple - 19/01/2016 08:21:11 PM 1100 Views
Not at all - 19/01/2016 10:17:39 PM 865 Views
Huh? - 20/01/2016 06:01:04 AM 1105 Views
agree to disagree I suppose ... I don't see it this way *NM* - 20/01/2016 04:41:16 PM 580 Views
I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. *NM* - 21/01/2016 12:01:16 AM 540 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. - 21/01/2016 02:07:21 AM 985 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. - 21/01/2016 03:32:59 AM 999 Views
I don't necessarily think that's true - 21/01/2016 05:07:40 PM 1098 Views
I don't see how magnifiers solve this - 21/01/2016 10:01:17 PM 1058 Views
Re: I don't see how magnifiers solve this - 21/01/2016 10:16:16 PM 1008 Views
Uhhh... - 22/01/2016 06:51:11 AM 1150 Views
Funny, I just saw this post - 17/09/2016 11:13:09 PM 895 Views
The very first chapter (the Prologue) disproves this - 03/10/2016 06:56:28 AM 926 Views
No it doesn't - 05/10/2016 12:47:03 AM 845 Views
Re: Don't those two facts explain each other? - 08/10/2016 05:06:53 AM 790 Views
Re: Yes, but that's not what I'm arguing... - 08/10/2016 04:52:06 AM 989 Views

Reply to Message