Active Users:931 Time:15/09/2025 10:38:30 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
The very first chapter (the Prologue) disproves this fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 03/10/2016 06:56:28 AM

View original post
If someone can draw more than this much above their maximum it would seem odd given how many times we've heard about the dangers of overdrawing.

Why? You can overdraw as massively as you want. The constant thing is that you will either be burned out, or straight out die. The best evidence for this is Lews Therin, who, with no angreal or sa'angreal, overdrew enough to create a mountain taller than Everest.

From there, the rest of your argument collapses...

Gonna miss these discussions. Was fun to lay this to bed.

Reply to message
Angreal, Sa'angreal and Moiraine at 66 Sidious - 11/01/2016 08:53:23 AM 2888 Views
Or we can choose to assume Elayne is incorrect darius_sedai - 11/01/2016 03:50:14 PM 1326 Views
Uhhh... fionwe1987 - 12/01/2016 12:07:42 AM 1466 Views
Yet there are problems with either darius_sedai - 15/01/2016 08:52:04 PM 1173 Views
Re: Yet there are problems with either Sidious - 16/01/2016 05:29:11 AM 1576 Views
Would you consider... Duke - 17/01/2016 09:06:59 AM 1281 Views
random thought on Shielding darius_sedai - 19/01/2016 07:34:20 PM 1321 Views
You're forgetting the other side, though. fionwe1987 - 19/01/2016 08:19:59 PM 1416 Views
yes but it doesn't proactively do this darius_sedai - 19/01/2016 10:06:25 PM 1253 Views
Responding to a shield doesn't require proactiveness fionwe1987 - 20/01/2016 05:53:24 AM 1191 Views
it's a visualization thing really darius_sedai - 20/01/2016 04:39:08 PM 1215 Views
Not the crux of the debate... fionwe1987 - 21/01/2016 03:37:40 AM 1306 Views
Not really though darius_sedai - 21/01/2016 05:00:34 PM 1065 Views
I always explained it as fionwe1987 - 21/01/2016 09:26:35 PM 1315 Views
There's not much to go on since all the shields except Berowyn's are the same darius_sedai - 21/01/2016 09:55:14 PM 1198 Views
That's precisely my point fionwe1987 - 21/01/2016 10:09:02 PM 1287 Views
now you are speculating based on a lack of evidence darius_sedai - 21/01/2016 10:39:13 PM 1125 Views
There's actual evidence: fionwe1987 - 22/01/2016 06:25:25 AM 1304 Views
what's dense here is that you keep putting in quotes that don't support your position darius_sedai - 22/01/2016 03:28:16 PM 1477 Views
Whoa.. fionwe1987 - 22/01/2016 04:24:19 PM 1383 Views
Not at all darius_sedai - 22/01/2016 05:03:50 PM 1337 Views
Wonderful fionwe1987 - 22/01/2016 06:30:35 PM 1317 Views
yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this darius_sedai - 22/01/2016 06:46:23 PM 1134 Views
Re: yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this Sidious - 23/01/2016 02:35:33 PM 1547 Views
Petty much *NM* darius_sedai - 24/01/2016 02:50:32 PM 698 Views
Hmmm.... Sidious - 23/01/2016 03:06:15 PM 1518 Views
Let me clear this up darius_sedai - 25/01/2016 04:19:51 PM 1558 Views
Some more quotes fionwe1987 - 25/01/2016 05:10:51 PM 1313 Views
none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise darius_sedai - 25/01/2016 07:19:48 PM 1645 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise fionwe1987 - 26/01/2016 03:45:52 AM 1317 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise Sidious - 26/01/2016 09:00:55 AM 1630 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise fionwe1987 - 26/01/2016 10:39:49 AM 1291 Views
from the very beginning of this conversation I've been saying I'm theorizing darius_sedai - 26/01/2016 04:09:19 PM 1195 Views
Oh well then I agree with you Sidious - 26/01/2016 08:50:55 AM 1513 Views
thanks darius_sedai - 26/01/2016 04:26:46 PM 1551 Views
Yes, but that's not what I'm arguing... fionwe1987 - 16/01/2016 08:56:15 AM 1119 Views
But additive doesn't explain buffers and being able to overdraw darius_sedai - 16/01/2016 03:02:33 PM 1170 Views
Don't those two facts explain each other? fionwe1987 - 16/01/2016 03:24:44 PM 1175 Views
It actually seems counterintuitive to me darius_sedai - 19/01/2016 07:15:37 PM 1124 Views
Simple fionwe1987 - 19/01/2016 08:21:11 PM 1244 Views
Not at all darius_sedai - 19/01/2016 10:17:39 PM 1047 Views
Huh? fionwe1987 - 20/01/2016 06:01:04 AM 1297 Views
agree to disagree I suppose ... I don't see it this way *NM* darius_sedai - 20/01/2016 04:41:16 PM 687 Views
I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. *NM* fionwe1987 - 21/01/2016 12:01:16 AM 651 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. darius_sedai - 21/01/2016 02:07:21 AM 1147 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. fionwe1987 - 21/01/2016 03:32:59 AM 1202 Views
I don't necessarily think that's true darius_sedai - 21/01/2016 05:07:40 PM 1252 Views
I don't see how magnifiers solve this fionwe1987 - 21/01/2016 10:01:17 PM 1220 Views
Re: I don't see how magnifiers solve this darius_sedai - 21/01/2016 10:16:16 PM 1180 Views
Uhhh... fionwe1987 - 22/01/2016 06:51:11 AM 1316 Views
Funny, I just saw this post darius_sedai - 17/09/2016 11:13:09 PM 1060 Views
The very first chapter (the Prologue) disproves this fionwe1987 - 03/10/2016 06:56:28 AM 1095 Views
No it doesn't darius_sedai - 05/10/2016 12:47:03 AM 997 Views
Re: Don't those two facts explain each other? Dunstan - 08/10/2016 05:06:53 AM 978 Views
Re: Yes, but that's not what I'm arguing... Dunstan - 08/10/2016 04:52:06 AM 1148 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes