Active Users:484 Time:17/10/2025 02:26:33 AM
The very first chapter (the Prologue) disproves this fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 03/10/2016 06:56:28 AM

View original post
If someone can draw more than this much above their maximum it would seem odd given how many times we've heard about the dangers of overdrawing.

Why? You can overdraw as massively as you want. The constant thing is that you will either be burned out, or straight out die. The best evidence for this is Lews Therin, who, with no angreal or sa'angreal, overdrew enough to create a mountain taller than Everest.

From there, the rest of your argument collapses...

Gonna miss these discussions. Was fun to lay this to bed.

Reply to message
Angreal, Sa'angreal and Moiraine at 66 - 11/01/2016 08:53:23 AM 2932 Views
Or we can choose to assume Elayne is incorrect - 11/01/2016 03:50:14 PM 1349 Views
Uhhh... - 12/01/2016 12:07:42 AM 1483 Views
Yet there are problems with either - 15/01/2016 08:52:04 PM 1199 Views
Re: Yet there are problems with either - 16/01/2016 05:29:11 AM 1593 Views
Would you consider... - 17/01/2016 09:06:59 AM 1298 Views
random thought on Shielding - 19/01/2016 07:34:20 PM 1341 Views
You're forgetting the other side, though. - 19/01/2016 08:19:59 PM 1426 Views
yes but it doesn't proactively do this - 19/01/2016 10:06:25 PM 1296 Views
Responding to a shield doesn't require proactiveness - 20/01/2016 05:53:24 AM 1211 Views
it's a visualization thing really - 20/01/2016 04:39:08 PM 1236 Views
Not the crux of the debate... - 21/01/2016 03:37:40 AM 1326 Views
Not really though - 21/01/2016 05:00:34 PM 1081 Views
I always explained it as - 21/01/2016 09:26:35 PM 1340 Views
There's not much to go on since all the shields except Berowyn's are the same - 21/01/2016 09:55:14 PM 1220 Views
That's precisely my point - 21/01/2016 10:09:02 PM 1300 Views
now you are speculating based on a lack of evidence - 21/01/2016 10:39:13 PM 1150 Views
There's actual evidence: - 22/01/2016 06:25:25 AM 1327 Views
what's dense here is that you keep putting in quotes that don't support your position - 22/01/2016 03:28:16 PM 1495 Views
Whoa.. - 22/01/2016 04:24:19 PM 1399 Views
Not at all - 22/01/2016 05:03:50 PM 1354 Views
Wonderful - 22/01/2016 06:30:35 PM 1337 Views
yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this - 22/01/2016 06:46:23 PM 1149 Views
Re: yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this - 23/01/2016 02:35:33 PM 1563 Views
Petty much *NM* - 24/01/2016 02:50:32 PM 711 Views
Hmmm.... - 23/01/2016 03:06:15 PM 1543 Views
Let me clear this up - 25/01/2016 04:19:51 PM 1578 Views
Some more quotes - 25/01/2016 05:10:51 PM 1337 Views
none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 25/01/2016 07:19:48 PM 1679 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 26/01/2016 03:45:52 AM 1332 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 26/01/2016 09:00:55 AM 1640 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 26/01/2016 10:39:49 AM 1319 Views
from the very beginning of this conversation I've been saying I'm theorizing - 26/01/2016 04:09:19 PM 1224 Views
Oh well then I agree with you - 26/01/2016 08:50:55 AM 1528 Views
thanks - 26/01/2016 04:26:46 PM 1569 Views
Yes, but that's not what I'm arguing... - 16/01/2016 08:56:15 AM 1143 Views
But additive doesn't explain buffers and being able to overdraw - 16/01/2016 03:02:33 PM 1196 Views
Don't those two facts explain each other? - 16/01/2016 03:24:44 PM 1200 Views
It actually seems counterintuitive to me - 19/01/2016 07:15:37 PM 1138 Views
Simple - 19/01/2016 08:21:11 PM 1262 Views
Not at all - 19/01/2016 10:17:39 PM 1066 Views
Huh? - 20/01/2016 06:01:04 AM 1326 Views
agree to disagree I suppose ... I don't see it this way *NM* - 20/01/2016 04:41:16 PM 694 Views
I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. *NM* - 21/01/2016 12:01:16 AM 659 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. - 21/01/2016 02:07:21 AM 1164 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. - 21/01/2016 03:32:59 AM 1220 Views
I don't necessarily think that's true - 21/01/2016 05:07:40 PM 1273 Views
I don't see how magnifiers solve this - 21/01/2016 10:01:17 PM 1237 Views
Re: I don't see how magnifiers solve this - 21/01/2016 10:16:16 PM 1209 Views
Uhhh... - 22/01/2016 06:51:11 AM 1339 Views
Funny, I just saw this post - 17/09/2016 11:13:09 PM 1084 Views
The very first chapter (the Prologue) disproves this - 03/10/2016 06:56:28 AM 1108 Views
No it doesn't - 05/10/2016 12:47:03 AM 1011 Views
Re: Don't those two facts explain each other? - 08/10/2016 05:06:53 AM 999 Views
Re: Yes, but that's not what I'm arguing... - 08/10/2016 04:52:06 AM 1162 Views

Reply to Message