The very first chapter (the Prologue) disproves this
fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 03/10/2016 06:56:28 AM
View original post
If someone can draw more than this much above their maximum it would seem odd given how many times we've heard about the dangers of overdrawing.
If someone can draw more than this much above their maximum it would seem odd given how many times we've heard about the dangers of overdrawing.
Why? You can overdraw as massively as you want. The constant thing is that you will either be burned out, or straight out die. The best evidence for this is Lews Therin, who, with no angreal or sa'angreal, overdrew enough to create a mountain taller than Everest.
From there, the rest of your argument collapses...
Gonna miss these discussions. Was fun to lay this to bed.
Angreal, Sa'angreal and Moiraine at 66
- 11/01/2016 08:53:23 AM
3060 Views
Uhhh...
- 12/01/2016 12:07:42 AM
1545 Views
Yet there are problems with either
- 15/01/2016 08:52:04 PM
1268 Views
Re: Yet there are problems with either
- 16/01/2016 05:29:11 AM
1653 Views
random thought on Shielding
- 19/01/2016 07:34:20 PM
1404 Views
You're forgetting the other side, though.
- 19/01/2016 08:19:59 PM
1499 Views
yes but it doesn't proactively do this
- 19/01/2016 10:06:25 PM
1341 Views
Responding to a shield doesn't require proactiveness
- 20/01/2016 05:53:24 AM
1261 Views
it's a visualization thing really
- 20/01/2016 04:39:08 PM
1294 Views
Not the crux of the debate...
- 21/01/2016 03:37:40 AM
1375 Views
Not really though
- 21/01/2016 05:00:34 PM
1133 Views
I always explained it as
- 21/01/2016 09:26:35 PM
1403 Views
There's not much to go on since all the shields except Berowyn's are the same
- 21/01/2016 09:55:14 PM
1260 Views
That's precisely my point
- 21/01/2016 10:09:02 PM
1364 Views
now you are speculating based on a lack of evidence
- 21/01/2016 10:39:13 PM
1208 Views
There's actual evidence:
- 22/01/2016 06:25:25 AM
1374 Views
what's dense here is that you keep putting in quotes that don't support your position
- 22/01/2016 03:28:16 PM
1560 Views
Whoa..
- 22/01/2016 04:24:19 PM
1442 Views
Not at all
- 22/01/2016 05:03:50 PM
1383 Views
Wonderful
- 22/01/2016 06:30:35 PM
1376 Views
yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this
- 22/01/2016 06:46:23 PM
1201 Views
Re: yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this
- 23/01/2016 02:35:33 PM
1615 Views
Hmmm....
- 23/01/2016 03:06:15 PM
1611 Views
Let me clear this up
- 25/01/2016 04:19:51 PM
1639 Views
Some more quotes
- 25/01/2016 05:10:51 PM
1394 Views
none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
- 25/01/2016 07:19:48 PM
1741 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
- 26/01/2016 03:45:52 AM
1382 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
- 26/01/2016 09:00:55 AM
1685 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
- 26/01/2016 10:39:49 AM
1363 Views
from the very beginning of this conversation I've been saying I'm theorizing
- 26/01/2016 04:09:19 PM
1275 Views
Yes, but that's not what I'm arguing...
- 16/01/2016 08:56:15 AM
1209 Views
But additive doesn't explain buffers and being able to overdraw
- 16/01/2016 03:02:33 PM
1260 Views
Don't those two facts explain each other?
- 16/01/2016 03:24:44 PM
1259 Views
It actually seems counterintuitive to me
- 19/01/2016 07:15:37 PM
1201 Views
Simple
- 19/01/2016 08:21:11 PM
1319 Views
Not at all
- 19/01/2016 10:17:39 PM
1113 Views
Huh?
- 20/01/2016 06:01:04 AM
1382 Views
agree to disagree I suppose ... I don't see it this way
*NM*
- 20/01/2016 04:41:16 PM
733 Views
*NM*
- 20/01/2016 04:41:16 PM
733 Views
I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. *NM*
- 21/01/2016 12:01:16 AM
694 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position.
- 21/01/2016 02:07:21 AM
1224 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position.
- 21/01/2016 03:32:59 AM
1268 Views
I don't necessarily think that's true
- 21/01/2016 05:07:40 PM
1331 Views
I don't see how magnifiers solve this
- 21/01/2016 10:01:17 PM
1308 Views
Re: I don't see how magnifiers solve this
- 21/01/2016 10:16:16 PM
1267 Views
Uhhh...
- 22/01/2016 06:51:11 AM
1390 Views
Funny, I just saw this post
- 17/09/2016 11:13:09 PM
1123 Views
The very first chapter (the Prologue) disproves this
- 03/10/2016 06:56:28 AM
1166 Views
