Active Users:1590 Time:17/12/2025 04:14:56 AM
I disagree Lord Haart Send a noteboard - 06/01/2010 05:42:44 PM
The bottom line is, I think it is perfectly reasonable of me to think that when Rand balefired Graendals palace, he did this. He used a small amount of what CK could offer to extend the balefire streams width, so that he would take out the entire palace in "one go". But he kept the total strength as low as possible to minimise the damage since he did not want to unmake existence just yet. In doing so he got Graendal (probably) but did not cause immense damage. Some yes, but not anywhere close enough to bring the pattern anywhere near to total destruction which is what Min and Nynaeve seemed to think.


I think there are two factors in Balefire:

1 - Strength (how far back in time the Pattern is burnt out)

2 - Area (how much the balefire affects - this includes the range of the BF)

I see no reason to believe that Rand moderated his use of the CK. After all, he is taking out one of the top Forsaken, and before this, he spreads the knowledge of Balefire to his Asha'man (Narishma), suggesting that while he knows it is dangerous, he doesn't really realise why or how much it is.

Now, Brandon has commented on how far back in time balefire can take things - we know that at most, it couldn't have taken Graendal back more than a week or so (Brandon said a day or two IIRC), but we know that the balefire was strong enough to remove the Compulsion placed on Ramshalan (probably 20-60 minutes earlier). Note that this minimum is roughly equal to or greater than the amount of time that Rand restored in TFoH with Rahvin.

With Rahvin, Rand used at most 1 metre squared of balefire (likely less, but we'll be generous). We also know that Natrin's Barrow is a large estate, so assuming that Rand's target area was 1km squared is not unreasonable.

1km squared = 1 million metres. This strongly suggests that he is definitely drawing deeply on the Choedan Kal.

----

Regarding the destruction of cities in the War of Power, I'd explain it in two parts:

1 - Cities in our world are growing more and more densely populated - AoL cities would have been similar. One square km could hold millions of people in an AoL skyscraper. So there is less area to cover.

2 - We never hear how far back the population was taken. For all we know, the balefire streams were broad but far weaker than Rand's, only taking them back seconds or perhaps even less.
Reply to message
Rand the psycho? - 06/01/2010 02:53:30 AM 1741 Views
I cannot follow your assumptions. - 06/01/2010 04:07:33 AM 1151 Views
On Balefire - 06/01/2010 04:43:18 AM 1150 Views
Good point - 06/01/2010 05:04:26 AM 1158 Views
On the nature of BaleFire - 06/01/2010 03:32:25 PM 1080 Views
Re: I cannot follow your assumptions. - 06/01/2010 04:59:12 AM 972 Views
Wait! - 06/01/2010 05:10:33 AM 1074 Views
Re: Wait! - 06/01/2010 05:20:02 AM 980 Views
Re: Wait! - 06/01/2010 05:58:00 AM 967 Views
Re: Wait! - 06/01/2010 11:46:13 AM 928 Views
Re: Wait! - 06/01/2010 03:55:01 PM 938 Views
I disagree - 06/01/2010 05:42:44 PM 896 Views
Re: I disagree - 06/01/2010 06:41:08 PM 922 Views
Re: I disagree - 07/01/2010 04:42:40 AM 913 Views
I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 06/01/2010 07:30:56 AM 1035 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 06/01/2010 03:32:24 PM 933 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 06/01/2010 09:52:47 PM 1034 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 06/01/2010 11:19:56 PM 952 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 07/01/2010 12:21:50 AM 1007 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 07/01/2010 12:56:26 AM 951 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 07/01/2010 01:46:16 AM 1005 Views
I agree with Templar - 09/01/2010 04:36:20 PM 901 Views
Re: I cannot follow your assumptions. - 06/01/2010 07:57:54 AM 1022 Views
Rand crossed a line - 06/01/2010 02:36:42 PM 1038 Views
Re: Rand crossed a line - 06/01/2010 04:16:12 PM 989 Views
But... - 06/01/2010 04:34:02 PM 1082 Views
Re: But... - 06/01/2010 06:14:25 PM 875 Views
Doesn't Balefire remove your thread from the Pattern permanently? - 06/01/2010 02:55:38 PM 1018 Views
No, RJ stated balefired people can be reborn. *NM* - 06/01/2010 03:26:00 PM 498 Views
But not in this turning of the Wheel. So they'd miss out on MANY lifetimes. - 06/01/2010 05:46:04 PM 945 Views
What? - 06/01/2010 06:20:56 PM 954 Views
Where did you get that? - 06/01/2010 07:09:38 PM 908 Views
No, balefire just kills you backwards in time. It is not super-death. *NM* - 06/01/2010 09:58:18 PM 511 Views
LOL ... super-death! - 06/01/2010 11:59:31 PM 887 Views
Hah! *NM* - 07/01/2010 12:06:07 AM 508 Views
It makes me think of History of the World Part 1 - 07/01/2010 12:53:20 AM 905 Views
It makes me think of History of the World Part 1 - 07/01/2010 12:53:33 AM 864 Views
Yes it was. - 06/01/2010 06:51:15 PM 1019 Views
Re: Yes it was. - 06/01/2010 07:16:14 PM 966 Views
Re: Yes it was. - 06/01/2010 08:58:40 PM 962 Views
Re: Yes it was. - 06/01/2010 10:47:11 PM 968 Views
let me ask the question in a different way - 06/01/2010 11:26:43 PM 968 Views
Re: let me ask the question in a different way - 06/01/2010 11:40:56 PM 946 Views
actually that quote supports my thoughts - 06/01/2010 11:50:40 PM 1017 Views
Re: actually that quote supports my thoughts - 07/01/2010 12:10:07 AM 901 Views
Meh. I just think advocating mass-murder is the opposite direction RJ meant for this to take. - 07/01/2010 12:00:44 AM 1017 Views
Sigh. What mass murder? - 07/01/2010 12:15:01 AM 849 Views
you are kidding right? - 07/01/2010 12:19:58 AM 958 Views
In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 03:14:32 PM 925 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 03:57:43 PM 947 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 07:13:21 PM 953 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 07:52:24 PM 883 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 08:56:43 PM 973 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 09:26:01 PM 918 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 09:30:45 PM 853 Views
Personally I'm kind of sick of Rand being the only person killing FS! - 07/01/2010 09:42:57 PM 1017 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 09:56:02 PM 970 Views
OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol: - 07/01/2010 10:30:19 PM 973 Views
Re: OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol: - 08/01/2010 01:53:25 PM 912 Views
Re: OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol: - 08/01/2010 02:56:41 PM 950 Views
What might work... - 08/01/2010 12:35:17 PM 860 Views
Re: What might work... - 08/01/2010 11:38:09 PM 874 Views
Yes. Anakin Skywalker all over again - 06/01/2010 11:01:02 PM 1043 Views
Meh - 06/01/2010 11:30:24 PM 884 Views
The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! - 06/01/2010 11:33:32 PM 880 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! - 06/01/2010 11:50:37 PM 968 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! - 06/01/2010 11:55:03 PM 944 Views
I do have to guiltily say, though, that if Rand had balefired the Seanchan and THEN became good... - 07/01/2010 12:03:20 AM 937 Views
*laughs behind hand* - 07/01/2010 12:05:54 AM 1000 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! - 07/01/2010 12:23:11 AM 868 Views
I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing - 07/01/2010 12:52:25 AM 902 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing - 07/01/2010 01:24:32 AM 953 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing - 07/01/2010 03:33:52 PM 886 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing - 07/01/2010 04:28:18 PM 1036 Views
right cause all Generals are so well versed in medical conditions - 07/01/2010 09:44:09 PM 1008 Views
Nice way to avoid the argument. - 07/01/2010 10:00:17 PM 943 Views
I'm just done talking in circles. You seem to think that because people - 07/01/2010 11:53:05 PM 969 Views
I concede - 07/01/2010 01:09:11 AM 871 Views
You weren't wrong overall, but there were some serious flaws in your reasoning. - 07/01/2010 02:43:17 AM 1006 Views
Tee hee. - 07/01/2010 05:28:52 AM 943 Views
Morals are subjective anyhow, - 07/01/2010 06:23:09 AM 955 Views
Re: Morals are subjective anyhow, - 07/01/2010 03:23:59 PM 892 Views
I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention - 09/01/2010 12:00:02 AM 959 Views
Re: I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention - 09/01/2010 05:56:16 PM 1135 Views
Re: I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention - 18/01/2010 01:00:23 PM 1265 Views
Your assertions weaken your overall argument. - 11/01/2010 04:47:10 PM 851 Views
Re: Your assertions weaken your overall argument. - 18/01/2010 12:49:26 PM 894 Views

Reply to Message