The bottom line is, I think it is perfectly reasonable of me to think that when Rand balefired Graendals palace, he did this. He used a small amount of what CK could offer to extend the balefire streams width, so that he would take out the entire palace in "one go". But he kept the total strength as low as possible to minimise the damage since he did not want to unmake existence just yet. In doing so he got Graendal (probably) but did not cause immense damage. Some yes, but not anywhere close enough to bring the pattern anywhere near to total destruction which is what Min and Nynaeve seemed to think.
I think there are two factors in Balefire:
1 - Strength (how far back in time the Pattern is burnt out)
2 - Area (how much the balefire affects - this includes the range of the BF)
I see no reason to believe that Rand moderated his use of the CK. After all, he is taking out one of the top Forsaken, and before this, he spreads the knowledge of Balefire to his Asha'man (Narishma), suggesting that while he knows it is dangerous, he doesn't really realise why or how much it is.
Now, Brandon has commented on how far back in time balefire can take things - we know that at most, it couldn't have taken Graendal back more than a week or so (Brandon said a day or two IIRC), but we know that the balefire was strong enough to remove the Compulsion placed on Ramshalan (probably 20-60 minutes earlier). Note that this minimum is roughly equal to or greater than the amount of time that Rand restored in TFoH with Rahvin.
With Rahvin, Rand used at most 1 metre squared of balefire (likely less, but we'll be generous). We also know that Natrin's Barrow is a large estate, so assuming that Rand's target area was 1km squared is not unreasonable.
1km squared = 1 million metres. This strongly suggests that he is definitely drawing deeply on the Choedan Kal.
----
Regarding the destruction of cities in the War of Power, I'd explain it in two parts:
1 - Cities in our world are growing more and more densely populated - AoL cities would have been similar. One square km could hold millions of people in an AoL skyscraper. So there is less area to cover.
2 - We never hear how far back the population was taken. For all we know, the balefire streams were broad but far weaker than Rand's, only taking them back seconds or perhaps even less.
Rand the psycho?
- 06/01/2010 02:53:30 AM
1835 Views
I cannot follow your assumptions.
- 06/01/2010 04:07:33 AM
1245 Views
Re: I cannot follow your assumptions.
- 06/01/2010 04:59:12 AM
1074 Views
Wait!
- 06/01/2010 05:10:33 AM
1151 Views
Re: Wait!
- 06/01/2010 05:20:02 AM
1064 Views
Re: Wait!
- 06/01/2010 05:58:00 AM
1054 Views
Re: Wait!
- 06/01/2010 11:46:13 AM
1027 Views
Re: Wait!
- 06/01/2010 03:55:01 PM
1027 Views
I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 06/01/2010 07:30:56 AM
1121 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 06/01/2010 03:32:24 PM
1023 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 06/01/2010 09:52:47 PM
1124 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 06/01/2010 11:19:56 PM
1043 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 07/01/2010 12:21:50 AM
1099 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 07/01/2010 12:56:26 AM
1030 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 07/01/2010 01:46:16 AM
1098 Views
Of course, I agree with you, esp since I just put forth the idea you support earlier in the thread.
- 11/01/2010 04:58:26 PM
1535 Views
Rand crossed a line
- 06/01/2010 02:36:42 PM
1125 Views
Doesn't Balefire remove your thread from the Pattern permanently?
- 06/01/2010 02:55:38 PM
1115 Views
No, RJ stated balefired people can be reborn. *NM*
- 06/01/2010 03:26:00 PM
542 Views
But not in this turning of the Wheel. So they'd miss out on MANY lifetimes.
- 06/01/2010 05:46:04 PM
1024 Views
No, balefire just kills you backwards in time. It is not super-death. *NM*
- 06/01/2010 09:58:18 PM
549 Views
LOL ... super-death!
- 06/01/2010 11:59:31 PM
964 Views
Yes it was.
- 06/01/2010 06:51:15 PM
1104 Views
Re: Yes it was.
- 06/01/2010 07:16:14 PM
1069 Views
Re: Yes it was.
- 06/01/2010 08:58:40 PM
1057 Views
Re: Yes it was.
- 06/01/2010 10:47:11 PM
1056 Views
let me ask the question in a different way
- 06/01/2010 11:26:43 PM
1061 Views
Re: let me ask the question in a different way
- 06/01/2010 11:40:56 PM
1040 Views
actually that quote supports my thoughts
- 06/01/2010 11:50:40 PM
1123 Views
Re: actually that quote supports my thoughts
- 07/01/2010 12:10:07 AM
992 Views
yet it could take him some undetermined amount of time to figure out your dead?
- 07/01/2010 12:34:34 AM
995 Views
Re: yet it could take him some undetermined amount of time to figure out your dead?
- 07/01/2010 01:13:40 AM
956 Views
Meh. I just think advocating mass-murder is the opposite direction RJ meant for this to take.
- 07/01/2010 12:00:44 AM
1097 Views
Sigh. What mass murder?
- 07/01/2010 12:15:01 AM
941 Views
In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 03:14:32 PM
1017 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 03:57:43 PM
1042 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 07:13:21 PM
1048 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 07:52:24 PM
969 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 08:56:43 PM
1059 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 09:26:01 PM
1024 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 09:30:45 PM
941 Views
Personally I'm kind of sick of Rand being the only person killing FS!
- 07/01/2010 09:42:57 PM
1096 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 09:56:02 PM
1065 Views
OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol:
- 07/01/2010 10:30:19 PM
1070 Views
Yes. Anakin Skywalker all over again
- 06/01/2010 11:01:02 PM
1135 Views
Meh
- 06/01/2010 11:30:24 PM
961 Views
The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
- 06/01/2010 11:33:32 PM
966 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
- 06/01/2010 11:50:37 PM
1066 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
- 06/01/2010 11:55:03 PM
1025 Views
I do have to guiltily say, though, that if Rand had balefired the Seanchan and THEN became good...
- 07/01/2010 12:03:20 AM
1022 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
- 07/01/2010 12:23:11 AM
945 Views
I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
- 07/01/2010 12:52:25 AM
991 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
- 07/01/2010 01:24:32 AM
1060 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
- 07/01/2010 03:33:52 PM
979 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
- 07/01/2010 04:28:18 PM
1134 Views
right cause all Generals are so well versed in medical conditions
- 07/01/2010 09:44:09 PM
1095 Views
- 07/01/2010 09:44:09 PM
1095 Views
Nice way to avoid the argument.
- 07/01/2010 10:00:17 PM
1032 Views
I'm just done talking in circles. You seem to think that because people
- 07/01/2010 11:53:05 PM
1055 Views
I concede
- 07/01/2010 01:09:11 AM
966 Views
You weren't wrong overall, but there were some serious flaws in your reasoning.
- 07/01/2010 02:43:17 AM
1092 Views
Morals are subjective anyhow,
- 07/01/2010 06:23:09 AM
1040 Views
Re: Morals are subjective anyhow,
- 07/01/2010 03:23:59 PM
977 Views
I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention
- 09/01/2010 12:00:02 AM
1045 Views
You are treating Graendal's "pets" as though they were enemy combatants
- 07/01/2010 03:40:03 PM
1107 Views
Like I give a damn what a group of professional killers would do.
- 08/01/2010 11:39:11 PM
983 Views
Graendal captured these people as part of the Shadows offensive, Operation Chaos Rules
- 09/01/2010 12:00:40 AM
1267 Views
Well, I still liked your first argument. It's a freaking war. The argument ...
- 07/01/2010 07:08:53 PM
1021 Views
