Datakim is trying to justify his actions, but Rand is cold and uncaring (much like a forsaken). Everyone who described him mention a darkness (actual dimming of light) that surrounds him. That is the concern.
Not all his actions, just this one. I am not focusing on Rand as a whole in this book. There is no question that he went completely insane. That is obvious. I am talking only of Graendals palace and whether he killed innocent people, or only released mindless drones from their suffering. And the balefire debate which seems to have taken a separate life, about whether Rand could have used balefire in a way that minimized the damage to the pattern by altering the width of the stream without increasing the power of it.
Threatening to kill the borderlanders, attacking his father, preparing to destroy Ebou Dar (and the civilians there) and threatening to destroy pattern are all acts of utter insanity and evil.
And I think the darkness was caused by the fact that Rand channeled the True Power. The very essence of the Dark One. I think without touching the TP, he could have become equally evil but lacked the darkness. TP caused that.
Rand the psycho?
06/01/2010 02:53:30 AM
- 1617 Views
I cannot follow your assumptions.
06/01/2010 04:07:33 AM
- 1019 Views
Re: I cannot follow your assumptions.
06/01/2010 04:59:12 AM
- 854 Views
Wait!
06/01/2010 05:10:33 AM
- 973 Views
Re: Wait!
06/01/2010 05:20:02 AM
- 889 Views
Re: Wait!
06/01/2010 05:58:00 AM
- 857 Views
Re: Wait!
06/01/2010 11:46:13 AM
- 805 Views
I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
06/01/2010 07:30:56 AM
- 930 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
06/01/2010 03:32:24 PM
- 837 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
06/01/2010 09:52:47 PM
- 901 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
06/01/2010 11:19:56 PM
- 788 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
07/01/2010 12:21:50 AM
- 881 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
07/01/2010 12:56:26 AM
- 813 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
07/01/2010 01:46:16 AM
- 853 Views
Of course, I agree with you, esp since I just put forth the idea you support earlier in the thread.
11/01/2010 04:58:26 PM
- 1284 Views
Rand crossed a line
06/01/2010 02:36:42 PM
- 924 Views
Doesn't Balefire remove your thread from the Pattern permanently?
06/01/2010 02:55:38 PM
- 868 Views
No, RJ stated balefired people can be reborn. *NM*
06/01/2010 03:26:00 PM
- 426 Views
But not in this turning of the Wheel. So they'd miss out on MANY lifetimes.
06/01/2010 05:46:04 PM
- 829 Views
No, balefire just kills you backwards in time. It is not super-death. *NM*
06/01/2010 09:58:18 PM
- 459 Views
LOL ... super-death!
06/01/2010 11:59:31 PM
- 777 Views
Yes it was.
06/01/2010 06:51:15 PM
- 896 Views
Re: Yes it was.
06/01/2010 07:16:14 PM
- 814 Views
Re: Yes it was.
06/01/2010 08:58:40 PM
- 853 Views
Re: Yes it was.
06/01/2010 10:47:11 PM
- 846 Views
let me ask the question in a different way
06/01/2010 11:26:43 PM
- 834 Views
Re: let me ask the question in a different way
06/01/2010 11:40:56 PM
- 829 Views
actually that quote supports my thoughts
06/01/2010 11:50:40 PM
- 848 Views
Re: actually that quote supports my thoughts
07/01/2010 12:10:07 AM
- 807 Views
yet it could take him some undetermined amount of time to figure out your dead?
07/01/2010 12:34:34 AM
- 788 Views
Re: yet it could take him some undetermined amount of time to figure out your dead?
07/01/2010 01:13:40 AM
- 761 Views
Meh. I just think advocating mass-murder is the opposite direction RJ meant for this to take.
07/01/2010 12:00:44 AM
- 863 Views
Sigh. What mass murder?
07/01/2010 12:15:01 AM
- 750 Views
In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 03:14:32 PM
- 820 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 03:57:43 PM
- 827 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 07:13:21 PM
- 841 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 07:52:24 PM
- 786 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 08:56:43 PM
- 856 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 09:26:01 PM
- 785 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 09:30:45 PM
- 729 Views
Personally I'm kind of sick of Rand being the only person killing FS!
07/01/2010 09:42:57 PM
- 907 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 09:56:02 PM
- 844 Views
OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol:
07/01/2010 10:30:19 PM
- 824 Views
Yes. Anakin Skywalker all over again
06/01/2010 11:01:02 PM
- 919 Views
Meh
06/01/2010 11:30:24 PM
- 763 Views
The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
06/01/2010 11:33:32 PM
- 769 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
06/01/2010 11:50:37 PM
- 845 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
06/01/2010 11:55:03 PM
- 791 Views
I do have to guiltily say, though, that if Rand had balefired the Seanchan and THEN became good...
07/01/2010 12:03:20 AM
- 824 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
07/01/2010 12:23:11 AM
- 769 Views
I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
07/01/2010 12:52:25 AM
- 774 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
07/01/2010 01:24:32 AM
- 836 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
07/01/2010 03:33:52 PM
- 778 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
07/01/2010 04:28:18 PM
- 924 Views
right cause all Generals are so well versed in medical conditions
07/01/2010 09:44:09 PM
- 878 Views

Nice way to avoid the argument.
07/01/2010 10:00:17 PM
- 830 Views
I'm just done talking in circles. You seem to think that because people
07/01/2010 11:53:05 PM
- 862 Views
I concede
07/01/2010 01:09:11 AM
- 757 Views
You weren't wrong overall, but there were some serious flaws in your reasoning.
07/01/2010 02:43:17 AM
- 866 Views
Morals are subjective anyhow,
07/01/2010 06:23:09 AM
- 847 Views
Re: Morals are subjective anyhow,
07/01/2010 03:23:59 PM
- 772 Views
I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention
09/01/2010 12:00:02 AM
- 853 Views
You are treating Graendal's "pets" as though they were enemy combatants
07/01/2010 03:40:03 PM
- 855 Views
Like I give a damn what a group of professional killers would do.
08/01/2010 11:39:11 PM
- 766 Views
Graendal captured these people as part of the Shadows offensive, Operation Chaos Rules
09/01/2010 12:00:40 AM
- 1079 Views
Well, I still liked your first argument. It's a freaking war. The argument ...
07/01/2010 07:08:53 PM
- 804 Views