Active Users:616 Time:19/03/2026 02:15:26 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Re: yet it could take him some undetermined amount of time to figure out your dead? Datakim Send a noteboard - 07/01/2010 01:13:40 AM

does not compute


Well, I admit I was wrong when I started the thread, but just to clarify this particular issue only.

The DO probably realises that you are dead the instant you die. It is just that since balefire causes you to die in the past this does not help.

The point is time is the issue that stops the DO from bringing you back. Balefire does not destroy souls.

If you are interested in further clarification, you can read more quotes from both RJ and BS on this subject here:

http://www.theoryland.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=372
Reply to message
Rand the psycho? Datakim - 06/01/2010 02:53:30 AM 1802 Views
I cannot follow your assumptions. Fanatic-Templar - 06/01/2010 04:07:33 AM 1212 Views
On Balefire Lord Haart - 06/01/2010 04:43:18 AM 1207 Views
Good point Datakim - 06/01/2010 05:04:26 AM 1221 Views
On the nature of BaleFire Lord Haart - 06/01/2010 03:32:25 PM 1133 Views
Re: I cannot follow your assumptions. Datakim - 06/01/2010 04:59:12 AM 1041 Views
Wait! Datakim - 06/01/2010 05:10:33 AM 1120 Views
Re: Wait! callandor1000 - 06/01/2010 05:20:02 AM 1035 Views
Re: Wait! Datakim - 06/01/2010 05:58:00 AM 1023 Views
Re: Wait! callandor1000 - 06/01/2010 11:46:13 AM 998 Views
Re: Wait! Datakim - 06/01/2010 03:55:01 PM 1001 Views
I disagree Lord Haart - 06/01/2010 05:42:44 PM 952 Views
Re: I disagree Datakim - 06/01/2010 06:41:08 PM 988 Views
Re: I disagree Lord Haart - 07/01/2010 04:42:40 AM 970 Views
I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. Fanatic-Templar - 06/01/2010 07:30:56 AM 1091 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. Datakim - 06/01/2010 03:32:24 PM 989 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. Fanatic-Templar - 06/01/2010 09:52:47 PM 1092 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. Datakim - 06/01/2010 11:19:56 PM 1010 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. Fanatic-Templar - 07/01/2010 12:21:50 AM 1066 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. Datakim - 07/01/2010 12:56:26 AM 996 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. Fanatic-Templar - 07/01/2010 01:46:16 AM 1064 Views
I agree with Templar Lord Haart - 09/01/2010 04:36:20 PM 959 Views
Of course, I agree with you, esp since I just put forth the idea you support earlier in the thread. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 11/01/2010 04:58:26 PM 1502 Views
Re: I cannot follow your assumptions. Fanatic-Templar - 06/01/2010 07:57:54 AM 1097 Views
Rand crossed a line Etzel - 06/01/2010 02:36:42 PM 1099 Views
Re: Rand crossed a line Datakim - 06/01/2010 04:16:12 PM 1057 Views
But... Etzel - 06/01/2010 04:34:02 PM 1135 Views
Re: But... Datakim - 06/01/2010 06:14:25 PM 936 Views
Doesn't Balefire remove your thread from the Pattern permanently? darius_sedai - 06/01/2010 02:55:38 PM 1086 Views
No, RJ stated balefired people can be reborn. *NM* Etzel - 06/01/2010 03:26:00 PM 526 Views
But not in this turning of the Wheel. So they'd miss out on MANY lifetimes. Lord Haart - 06/01/2010 05:46:04 PM 989 Views
What? Datakim - 06/01/2010 06:20:56 PM 1004 Views
Where did you get that? Gher - 06/01/2010 07:09:38 PM 970 Views
No, balefire just kills you backwards in time. It is not super-death. *NM* Fanatic-Templar - 06/01/2010 09:58:18 PM 532 Views
LOL ... super-death! darius_sedai - 06/01/2010 11:59:31 PM 936 Views
Hah! *NM* RugbyPlayingAshaman - 07/01/2010 12:06:07 AM 528 Views
It makes me think of History of the World Part 1 darius_sedai - 07/01/2010 12:53:20 AM 970 Views
It makes me think of History of the World Part 1 darius_sedai - 07/01/2010 12:53:33 AM 926 Views
Yes it was. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 06/01/2010 06:51:15 PM 1071 Views
Re: Yes it was. Datakim - 06/01/2010 07:16:14 PM 1030 Views
Re: Yes it was. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 06/01/2010 08:58:40 PM 1026 Views
Re: Yes it was. Datakim - 06/01/2010 10:47:11 PM 1026 Views
let me ask the question in a different way darius_sedai - 06/01/2010 11:26:43 PM 1032 Views
Re: let me ask the question in a different way Datakim - 06/01/2010 11:40:56 PM 1009 Views
actually that quote supports my thoughts darius_sedai - 06/01/2010 11:50:40 PM 1074 Views
Re: actually that quote supports my thoughts Datakim - 07/01/2010 12:10:07 AM 964 Views
yet it could take him some undetermined amount of time to figure out your dead? darius_sedai - 07/01/2010 12:34:34 AM 971 Views
Re: yet it could take him some undetermined amount of time to figure out your dead? Datakim - 07/01/2010 01:13:40 AM 925 Views
Meh. I just think advocating mass-murder is the opposite direction RJ meant for this to take. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 07/01/2010 12:00:44 AM 1070 Views
Sigh. What mass murder? Datakim - 07/01/2010 12:15:01 AM 914 Views
you are kidding right? darius_sedai - 07/01/2010 12:19:58 AM 1011 Views
In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 07/01/2010 03:14:32 PM 986 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. Datakim - 07/01/2010 03:57:43 PM 1009 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 07/01/2010 07:13:21 PM 1013 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. Datakim - 07/01/2010 07:52:24 PM 937 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 07/01/2010 08:56:43 PM 1023 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. Datakim - 07/01/2010 09:26:01 PM 989 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 07/01/2010 09:30:45 PM 911 Views
Personally I'm kind of sick of Rand being the only person killing FS! darius_sedai - 07/01/2010 09:42:57 PM 1070 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. Datakim - 07/01/2010 09:56:02 PM 1030 Views
OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol: RugbyPlayingAshaman - 07/01/2010 10:30:19 PM 1031 Views
Re: OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol: Sidious - 08/01/2010 01:53:25 PM 967 Views
Re: OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol: RugbyPlayingAshaman - 08/01/2010 02:56:41 PM 1004 Views
What might work... Etzel - 08/01/2010 12:35:17 PM 908 Views
Re: What might work... Datakim - 08/01/2010 11:38:09 PM 927 Views
Yes. Anakin Skywalker all over again Itachi - 06/01/2010 11:01:02 PM 1098 Views
Meh Datakim - 06/01/2010 11:30:24 PM 932 Views
The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! darius_sedai - 06/01/2010 11:33:32 PM 935 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! Datakim - 06/01/2010 11:50:37 PM 1032 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! darius_sedai - 06/01/2010 11:55:03 PM 999 Views
I do have to guiltily say, though, that if Rand had balefired the Seanchan and THEN became good... RugbyPlayingAshaman - 07/01/2010 12:03:20 AM 989 Views
*laughs behind hand* darius_sedai - 07/01/2010 12:05:54 AM 1066 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! Datakim - 07/01/2010 12:23:11 AM 916 Views
I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing darius_sedai - 07/01/2010 12:52:25 AM 968 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing Datakim - 07/01/2010 01:24:32 AM 1022 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing darius_sedai - 07/01/2010 03:33:52 PM 949 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing Datakim - 07/01/2010 04:28:18 PM 1098 Views
right cause all Generals are so well versed in medical conditions darius_sedai - 07/01/2010 09:44:09 PM 1068 Views
Nice way to avoid the argument. Datakim - 07/01/2010 10:00:17 PM 996 Views
I'm just done talking in circles. You seem to think that because people darius_sedai - 07/01/2010 11:53:05 PM 1032 Views
I concede Datakim - 07/01/2010 01:09:11 AM 930 Views
You weren't wrong overall, but there were some serious flaws in your reasoning. Cannoli - 07/01/2010 02:43:17 AM 1067 Views
Tee hee. Fanatic-Templar - 07/01/2010 05:28:52 AM 1009 Views
Morals are subjective anyhow, Nyrende - 07/01/2010 06:23:09 AM 1011 Views
Re: Morals are subjective anyhow, RugbyPlayingAshaman - 07/01/2010 03:23:59 PM 948 Views
I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention Cannoli - 09/01/2010 12:00:02 AM 1023 Views
Re: I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention Lord Haart - 09/01/2010 05:56:16 PM 1199 Views
Re: I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention Cannoli - 18/01/2010 01:00:23 PM 1333 Views
Your assertions weaken your overall argument. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 11/01/2010 04:47:10 PM 909 Views
Re: Your assertions weaken your overall argument. Cannoli - 18/01/2010 12:49:26 PM 940 Views
You are treating Graendal's "pets" as though they were enemy combatants darius_sedai - 07/01/2010 03:40:03 PM 1080 Views
Like I give a damn what a group of professional killers would do. Cannoli - 08/01/2010 11:39:11 PM 944 Views
Graendal captured these people as part of the Shadows offensive, Operation Chaos Rules darius_sedai - 09/01/2010 12:00:40 AM 1238 Views
Well, I still liked your first argument. It's a freaking war. The argument ... amirebram - 07/01/2010 07:08:53 PM 993 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes