Active Users:1614 Time:16/12/2025 03:36:08 AM
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. Datakim Send a noteboard - 07/01/2010 03:57:43 PM
What I would prefer him to do was confront her and balefire her personally. He should have defeated her like he did other "smart" opponents.


If I understood the scene correctly, the whole point here was that LTT/Rand knew that unlike Rahvin or Sammael or the like who were arrogant and such, Graendal would never face Rand in a direct fight.

Using your idea, the moment Rand attacked the palace, Graendal would open a gateway and flee away, avoiding the battle entirely.

That is why Rand did what he did. Because it was the only way to take out the slippery Graendal. Direct confrontation would simply not have been possible with Graendal since she would always have easily escaped with traveling.

The only way what you suggest is possible, if Rand could have somehow warded the area in such a way that Graendal could not open a gateway to escape. However I don't think Rand knew this technique yet. So it was either balefire the whole place, or let Graendal escape. Those were sadly, the only two possible options.
Reply to message
Rand the psycho? - 06/01/2010 02:53:30 AM 1738 Views
I cannot follow your assumptions. - 06/01/2010 04:07:33 AM 1149 Views
On Balefire - 06/01/2010 04:43:18 AM 1148 Views
Good point - 06/01/2010 05:04:26 AM 1158 Views
On the nature of BaleFire - 06/01/2010 03:32:25 PM 1078 Views
Re: I cannot follow your assumptions. - 06/01/2010 04:59:12 AM 970 Views
Wait! - 06/01/2010 05:10:33 AM 1071 Views
Re: Wait! - 06/01/2010 05:20:02 AM 977 Views
Re: Wait! - 06/01/2010 05:58:00 AM 967 Views
Re: Wait! - 06/01/2010 11:46:13 AM 928 Views
Re: Wait! - 06/01/2010 03:55:01 PM 935 Views
I disagree - 06/01/2010 05:42:44 PM 894 Views
Re: I disagree - 06/01/2010 06:41:08 PM 918 Views
Re: I disagree - 07/01/2010 04:42:40 AM 911 Views
I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 06/01/2010 07:30:56 AM 1031 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 06/01/2010 03:32:24 PM 932 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 06/01/2010 09:52:47 PM 1032 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 06/01/2010 11:19:56 PM 949 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 07/01/2010 12:21:50 AM 1005 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 07/01/2010 12:56:26 AM 949 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 07/01/2010 01:46:16 AM 1002 Views
I agree with Templar - 09/01/2010 04:36:20 PM 901 Views
Re: I cannot follow your assumptions. - 06/01/2010 07:57:54 AM 1020 Views
Rand crossed a line - 06/01/2010 02:36:42 PM 1036 Views
Re: Rand crossed a line - 06/01/2010 04:16:12 PM 986 Views
But... - 06/01/2010 04:34:02 PM 1079 Views
Re: But... - 06/01/2010 06:14:25 PM 875 Views
Doesn't Balefire remove your thread from the Pattern permanently? - 06/01/2010 02:55:38 PM 1015 Views
No, RJ stated balefired people can be reborn. *NM* - 06/01/2010 03:26:00 PM 497 Views
But not in this turning of the Wheel. So they'd miss out on MANY lifetimes. - 06/01/2010 05:46:04 PM 945 Views
What? - 06/01/2010 06:20:56 PM 954 Views
Where did you get that? - 06/01/2010 07:09:38 PM 907 Views
No, balefire just kills you backwards in time. It is not super-death. *NM* - 06/01/2010 09:58:18 PM 511 Views
LOL ... super-death! - 06/01/2010 11:59:31 PM 885 Views
Hah! *NM* - 07/01/2010 12:06:07 AM 508 Views
It makes me think of History of the World Part 1 - 07/01/2010 12:53:20 AM 902 Views
It makes me think of History of the World Part 1 - 07/01/2010 12:53:33 AM 862 Views
Yes it was. - 06/01/2010 06:51:15 PM 1014 Views
Re: Yes it was. - 06/01/2010 07:16:14 PM 964 Views
Re: Yes it was. - 06/01/2010 08:58:40 PM 959 Views
Re: Yes it was. - 06/01/2010 10:47:11 PM 967 Views
let me ask the question in a different way - 06/01/2010 11:26:43 PM 967 Views
Re: let me ask the question in a different way - 06/01/2010 11:40:56 PM 944 Views
actually that quote supports my thoughts - 06/01/2010 11:50:40 PM 1016 Views
Re: actually that quote supports my thoughts - 07/01/2010 12:10:07 AM 899 Views
Meh. I just think advocating mass-murder is the opposite direction RJ meant for this to take. - 07/01/2010 12:00:44 AM 1014 Views
Sigh. What mass murder? - 07/01/2010 12:15:01 AM 848 Views
you are kidding right? - 07/01/2010 12:19:58 AM 956 Views
In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 03:14:32 PM 922 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 03:57:43 PM 947 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 07:13:21 PM 952 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 07:52:24 PM 881 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 08:56:43 PM 971 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 09:26:01 PM 917 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 09:30:45 PM 851 Views
Personally I'm kind of sick of Rand being the only person killing FS! - 07/01/2010 09:42:57 PM 1015 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 09:56:02 PM 968 Views
OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol: - 07/01/2010 10:30:19 PM 972 Views
Re: OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol: - 08/01/2010 01:53:25 PM 910 Views
Re: OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol: - 08/01/2010 02:56:41 PM 947 Views
What might work... - 08/01/2010 12:35:17 PM 858 Views
Re: What might work... - 08/01/2010 11:38:09 PM 872 Views
Yes. Anakin Skywalker all over again - 06/01/2010 11:01:02 PM 1040 Views
Meh - 06/01/2010 11:30:24 PM 882 Views
The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! - 06/01/2010 11:33:32 PM 878 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! - 06/01/2010 11:50:37 PM 967 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! - 06/01/2010 11:55:03 PM 942 Views
I do have to guiltily say, though, that if Rand had balefired the Seanchan and THEN became good... - 07/01/2010 12:03:20 AM 937 Views
*laughs behind hand* - 07/01/2010 12:05:54 AM 1000 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! - 07/01/2010 12:23:11 AM 866 Views
I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing - 07/01/2010 12:52:25 AM 899 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing - 07/01/2010 01:24:32 AM 951 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing - 07/01/2010 03:33:52 PM 884 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing - 07/01/2010 04:28:18 PM 1034 Views
right cause all Generals are so well versed in medical conditions - 07/01/2010 09:44:09 PM 1005 Views
Nice way to avoid the argument. - 07/01/2010 10:00:17 PM 941 Views
I'm just done talking in circles. You seem to think that because people - 07/01/2010 11:53:05 PM 967 Views
I concede - 07/01/2010 01:09:11 AM 869 Views
You weren't wrong overall, but there were some serious flaws in your reasoning. - 07/01/2010 02:43:17 AM 1004 Views
Tee hee. - 07/01/2010 05:28:52 AM 941 Views
Morals are subjective anyhow, - 07/01/2010 06:23:09 AM 955 Views
Re: Morals are subjective anyhow, - 07/01/2010 03:23:59 PM 887 Views
I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention - 09/01/2010 12:00:02 AM 956 Views
Re: I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention - 09/01/2010 05:56:16 PM 1134 Views
Re: I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention - 18/01/2010 01:00:23 PM 1263 Views
Your assertions weaken your overall argument. - 11/01/2010 04:47:10 PM 847 Views
Re: Your assertions weaken your overall argument. - 18/01/2010 12:49:26 PM 892 Views

Reply to Message