Not a question of intelligence. Rather, a different way of thinking...
Shannow Send a noteboard - 01/03/2010 07:23:37 PM
TGS (A Place to Begin) - "Is that what made you turn to his side?" Rand asked. "You were always so full of thoughts, Elan. Your logic destroyed you, didn't it?"
Was anyone struck by this statement?
I've always thought this was what snared Ishamael, and to see it written in plain text was striking to me. Ishamael is so intelligent and thinks everything through so deeply, that he arrives at conclusions that seem illogical. It's like someone who becomes hysterical when presented with 1+1, insisting that it's 2 instantly, whereas a brilliant mathematician has alternate theories.
In this same way, we all automatically know that the DO is evil, but Elan got caught up in complex philosophy. He's still caught up in it.
It's an interesting statement, and personifies Ishamael for me.
Is Ishamael really more intelligent than Aginor - the genius mad scientist? Or Graendal, the foremost psychologist in the world? Or Demandred, the man who has an IQ of 160 compared to Lews Therin's 170, according to RJ?
I don't necessarily think so. Ishamael is different because he is a theologian and philosopher. He looks at the world with different eyes and from a different perspective than the other super intelligent members of the Forsaken. This doesn't mean that he is smarter than them. It just means that his area of expertise happens to be most suitable to understanding the Dark One.
Aginor's specialist area is biology. Graendal's is psychology. Demandred's is leadership, military strategy and politics.
Ishamael's is the study of good and evil. Exactly what is needed to understand the Dark One. He may not understand biology as well as Aginor, the human mind as well as Graendal, political and military strategy as well as Demandred. But he understands the nature of good and evil better than anyone.
That's all.
Ishamael's nature
- 01/03/2010 05:27:48 PM
2033 Views
Not a question of intelligence. Rather, a different way of thinking...
- 01/03/2010 07:23:37 PM
1066 Views
I'd go with this - he lost sight of the forest for enumerating the trees.
- 01/03/2010 08:21:39 PM
1133 Views
I agree, except with your statement on what Ishamael's area of expertise is ...
- 02/03/2010 03:17:13 PM
878 Views
Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil
- 02/03/2010 04:38:06 PM
917 Views
Are you saying that philosophers are inherently more intelligent than other academics?
- 02/03/2010 04:53:13 PM
791 Views
Crap
- 02/03/2010 08:58:12 PM
839 Views
That high IQ should make you realise that I am making the same point you are...
- 02/03/2010 09:53:59 PM
821 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil
- 02/03/2010 05:30:43 PM
849 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil
- 02/03/2010 06:01:41 PM
856 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil
- 07/03/2010 11:31:14 PM
789 Views
I doubt that.
- 08/03/2010 01:21:32 AM
736 Views
Re: Not a question of intelligence. Rather, a different way of thinking...
- 02/03/2010 07:22:58 PM
793 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature
- 02/03/2010 01:49:19 AM
869 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature
- 02/03/2010 02:51:44 PM
816 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature
- 02/03/2010 07:31:32 PM
773 Views
Found a great theory about Ishamael and his logic on theoryland
- 02/03/2010 02:48:02 PM
1281 Views
I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least...
- 08/03/2010 01:47:47 AM
792 Views
Re: I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least...
- 08/03/2010 12:37:27 PM
732 Views
Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern.
- 08/03/2010 06:23:19 PM
815 Views
Re: Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern.
- 09/03/2010 01:54:26 PM
776 Views
Because there is a Creator.
- 09/03/2010 05:57:16 PM
707 Views
faulty assumptions
- 10/03/2010 05:05:23 AM
719 Views
Impossible.
- 10/03/2010 06:22:43 AM
725 Views
maybe an analogy will help
- 10/03/2010 12:55:37 PM
1129 Views
- 10/03/2010 12:55:37 PM
1129 Views
But therein lies the problem.
- 10/03/2010 04:58:42 PM
695 Views
your own argument is self defeating
- 11/03/2010 08:10:36 AM
746 Views
No, that past was created after he was imprisoned.
- 11/03/2010 05:43:08 PM
766 Views
*sigh* I guess we will just have to agree to disagree then.... I still think your theory is flawed *NM*
- 12/03/2010 05:11:10 AM
350 Views
Anyway I just realized this point is irrelevant to the original theory
- 11/03/2010 08:14:20 AM
728 Views
