Not a question of intelligence. Rather, a different way of thinking...
Shannow Send a noteboard - 01/03/2010 07:23:37 PM
TGS (A Place to Begin) - "Is that what made you turn to his side?" Rand asked. "You were always so full of thoughts, Elan. Your logic destroyed you, didn't it?"
Was anyone struck by this statement?
I've always thought this was what snared Ishamael, and to see it written in plain text was striking to me. Ishamael is so intelligent and thinks everything through so deeply, that he arrives at conclusions that seem illogical. It's like someone who becomes hysterical when presented with 1+1, insisting that it's 2 instantly, whereas a brilliant mathematician has alternate theories.
In this same way, we all automatically know that the DO is evil, but Elan got caught up in complex philosophy. He's still caught up in it.
It's an interesting statement, and personifies Ishamael for me.
Is Ishamael really more intelligent than Aginor - the genius mad scientist? Or Graendal, the foremost psychologist in the world? Or Demandred, the man who has an IQ of 160 compared to Lews Therin's 170, according to RJ?
I don't necessarily think so. Ishamael is different because he is a theologian and philosopher. He looks at the world with different eyes and from a different perspective than the other super intelligent members of the Forsaken. This doesn't mean that he is smarter than them. It just means that his area of expertise happens to be most suitable to understanding the Dark One.
Aginor's specialist area is biology. Graendal's is psychology. Demandred's is leadership, military strategy and politics.
Ishamael's is the study of good and evil. Exactly what is needed to understand the Dark One. He may not understand biology as well as Aginor, the human mind as well as Graendal, political and military strategy as well as Demandred. But he understands the nature of good and evil better than anyone.
That's all.
Ishamael's nature
01/03/2010 05:27:48 PM
- 1798 Views
Not a question of intelligence. Rather, a different way of thinking...
01/03/2010 07:23:37 PM
- 839 Views
I'd go with this - he lost sight of the forest for enumerating the trees.
01/03/2010 08:21:39 PM
- 908 Views
I agree, except with your statement on what Ishamael's area of expertise is ...
02/03/2010 03:17:13 PM
- 664 Views
Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil
02/03/2010 04:38:06 PM
- 693 Views
Are you saying that philosophers are inherently more intelligent than other academics?
02/03/2010 04:53:13 PM
- 590 Views
Crap
02/03/2010 08:58:12 PM
- 644 Views
That high IQ should make you realise that I am making the same point you are...
02/03/2010 09:53:59 PM
- 600 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil
02/03/2010 05:30:43 PM
- 610 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil
02/03/2010 06:01:41 PM
- 610 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil
07/03/2010 11:31:14 PM
- 551 Views
I doubt that.
08/03/2010 01:21:32 AM
- 526 Views
Re: Not a question of intelligence. Rather, a different way of thinking...
02/03/2010 07:22:58 PM
- 570 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature
02/03/2010 01:49:19 AM
- 643 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature
02/03/2010 02:51:44 PM
- 588 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature
02/03/2010 07:31:32 PM
- 566 Views
Found a great theory about Ishamael and his logic on theoryland
02/03/2010 02:48:02 PM
- 984 Views
I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least...
08/03/2010 01:47:47 AM
- 572 Views
Re: I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least...
08/03/2010 12:37:27 PM
- 520 Views
Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern.
08/03/2010 06:23:19 PM
- 553 Views
Re: Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern.
09/03/2010 01:54:26 PM
- 545 Views
Because there is a Creator.
09/03/2010 05:57:16 PM
- 499 Views
faulty assumptions
10/03/2010 05:05:23 AM
- 500 Views
Impossible.
10/03/2010 06:22:43 AM
- 498 Views
maybe an analogy will help
10/03/2010 12:55:37 PM
- 914 Views

But therein lies the problem.
10/03/2010 04:58:42 PM
- 492 Views
your own argument is self defeating
11/03/2010 08:10:36 AM
- 523 Views
No, that past was created after he was imprisoned.
11/03/2010 05:43:08 PM
- 529 Views
*sigh* I guess we will just have to agree to disagree then.... I still think your theory is flawed *NM*
12/03/2010 05:11:10 AM
- 235 Views
Anyway I just realized this point is irrelevant to the original theory
11/03/2010 08:14:20 AM
- 499 Views