Active Users:596 Time:16/06/2026 08:54:52 PM
Not a question of intelligence. Rather, a different way of thinking... Shannow Send a noteboard - 01/03/2010 07:23:37 PM

TGS (A Place to Begin) - "Is that what made you turn to his side?" Rand asked. "You were always so full of thoughts, Elan. Your logic destroyed you, didn't it?"

Was anyone struck by this statement?

I've always thought this was what snared Ishamael, and to see it written in plain text was striking to me. Ishamael is so intelligent and thinks everything through so deeply, that he arrives at conclusions that seem illogical. It's like someone who becomes hysterical when presented with 1+1, insisting that it's 2 instantly, whereas a brilliant mathematician has alternate theories.

In this same way, we all automatically know that the DO is evil, but Elan got caught up in complex philosophy. He's still caught up in it.

It's an interesting statement, and personifies Ishamael for me.


Is Ishamael really more intelligent than Aginor - the genius mad scientist? Or Graendal, the foremost psychologist in the world? Or Demandred, the man who has an IQ of 160 compared to Lews Therin's 170, according to RJ?

I don't necessarily think so. Ishamael is different because he is a theologian and philosopher. He looks at the world with different eyes and from a different perspective than the other super intelligent members of the Forsaken. This doesn't mean that he is smarter than them. It just means that his area of expertise happens to be most suitable to understanding the Dark One.

Aginor's specialist area is biology. Graendal's is psychology. Demandred's is leadership, military strategy and politics.

Ishamael's is the study of good and evil. Exactly what is needed to understand the Dark One. He may not understand biology as well as Aginor, the human mind as well as Graendal, political and military strategy as well as Demandred. But he understands the nature of good and evil better than anyone.

That's all.
Reply to message
Ishamael's nature - 01/03/2010 05:27:48 PM 1930 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 01/03/2010 07:15:54 PM 946 Views
Sisyphus *NM* - 02/03/2010 02:27:06 AM 339 Views
Not a question of intelligence. Rather, a different way of thinking... - 01/03/2010 07:23:37 PM 973 Views
I agree, except with your statement on what Ishamael's area of expertise is ... - 02/03/2010 03:17:13 PM 786 Views
Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil - 02/03/2010 04:38:06 PM 823 Views
Are you saying that philosophers are inherently more intelligent than other academics? - 02/03/2010 04:53:13 PM 715 Views
Maybe - 02/03/2010 06:00:20 PM 789 Views
Crap - 02/03/2010 08:58:12 PM 755 Views
I think the averages are averages. - 03/03/2010 01:14:41 AM 685 Views
Re: Crap - 05/03/2010 08:46:56 PM 696 Views
Re: Crap - 07/03/2010 11:36:16 PM 656 Views
I love IQ tests. - 08/03/2010 01:18:10 AM 638 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil - 02/03/2010 05:30:43 PM 761 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil - 07/03/2010 11:31:14 PM 675 Views
I'm not an expert on nihilism, but ... - 08/03/2010 05:22:33 PM 829 Views
I doubt that. - 08/03/2010 01:21:32 AM 651 Views
Re: I doubt that. - 08/03/2010 12:41:43 PM 632 Views
Yep, I agree. - 08/03/2010 05:58:03 PM 737 Views
This ties in with his parallel to Lucifer. - 03/03/2010 12:57:37 AM 736 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 01:49:19 AM 767 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 02:51:44 PM 732 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 07:31:32 PM 685 Views
Both of us are saying the same thing - 03/03/2010 01:46:57 PM 671 Views
sorry, took "evil" too literally and - 03/03/2010 07:02:01 PM 631 Views
Found a great theory about Ishamael and his logic on theoryland - 02/03/2010 02:48:02 PM 1184 Views
Nice - 02/03/2010 04:41:05 PM 705 Views
Impressive - 02/03/2010 07:24:09 PM 693 Views
I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least... - 08/03/2010 01:47:47 AM 688 Views
Re: I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least... - 08/03/2010 12:37:27 PM 643 Views
Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern. - 08/03/2010 06:23:19 PM 703 Views
Re: Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern. - 09/03/2010 01:54:26 PM 694 Views
Because there is a Creator. - 09/03/2010 05:57:16 PM 630 Views
faulty assumptions - 10/03/2010 05:05:23 AM 631 Views
Impossible. - 10/03/2010 06:22:43 AM 639 Views
maybe an analogy will help - 10/03/2010 12:55:37 PM 1044 Views
But therein lies the problem. - 10/03/2010 04:58:42 PM 609 Views
your own argument is self defeating - 11/03/2010 08:10:36 AM 650 Views
Anyway I just realized this point is irrelevant to the original theory - 11/03/2010 08:14:20 AM 632 Views
Yes, I said that at the very beginning: *NM* - 11/03/2010 05:44:19 PM 295 Views
Your reasons and mine for irrelevancy are different.. *NM* - 12/03/2010 05:12:52 AM 280 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 10:43:16 PM 711 Views
I don't know if this has any basis in fact... - 04/03/2010 02:44:26 AM 851 Views

Reply to Message