Active Users:142 Time:02/06/2024 10:38:22 AM
Are you saying that philosophers are inherently more intelligent than other academics? Shannow Send a noteboard - 02/03/2010 04:53:13 PM
If so, I disagree with you. If you have them all write IQ tests I'm pretty sure that the quantum physicists, theoretical mathematicians etc will trump the philosophers and theologians.
Reply to message
Ishamael's nature - 01/03/2010 05:27:48 PM 1633 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 01/03/2010 07:15:54 PM 672 Views
Sisyphus *NM* - 02/03/2010 02:27:06 AM 218 Views
Not a question of intelligence. Rather, a different way of thinking... - 01/03/2010 07:23:37 PM 719 Views
I agree, except with your statement on what Ishamael's area of expertise is ... - 02/03/2010 03:17:13 PM 524 Views
Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil - 02/03/2010 04:38:06 PM 532 Views
Are you saying that philosophers are inherently more intelligent than other academics? - 02/03/2010 04:53:13 PM 445 Views
Maybe - 02/03/2010 06:00:20 PM 510 Views
Crap - 02/03/2010 08:58:12 PM 491 Views
I think the averages are averages. - 03/03/2010 01:14:41 AM 422 Views
Re: Crap - 05/03/2010 08:46:56 PM 398 Views
Re: Crap - 07/03/2010 11:36:16 PM 365 Views
I love IQ tests. - 08/03/2010 01:18:10 AM 365 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil - 02/03/2010 05:30:43 PM 457 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil - 07/03/2010 11:31:14 PM 405 Views
I'm not an expert on nihilism, but ... - 08/03/2010 05:22:33 PM 552 Views
I doubt that. - 08/03/2010 01:21:32 AM 375 Views
Re: I doubt that. - 08/03/2010 12:41:43 PM 363 Views
Yep, I agree. - 08/03/2010 05:58:03 PM 454 Views
This ties in with his parallel to Lucifer. - 03/03/2010 12:57:37 AM 444 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 01:49:19 AM 488 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 02:51:44 PM 433 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 07:31:32 PM 410 Views
Both of us are saying the same thing - 03/03/2010 01:46:57 PM 387 Views
sorry, took "evil" too literally and - 03/03/2010 07:02:01 PM 363 Views
Found a great theory about Ishamael and his logic on theoryland - 02/03/2010 02:48:02 PM 745 Views
Nice - 02/03/2010 04:41:05 PM 443 Views
Impressive - 02/03/2010 07:24:09 PM 432 Views
I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least... - 08/03/2010 01:47:47 AM 423 Views
Re: I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least... - 08/03/2010 12:37:27 PM 378 Views
Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern. - 08/03/2010 06:23:19 PM 370 Views
Re: Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern. - 09/03/2010 01:54:26 PM 358 Views
Because there is a Creator. - 09/03/2010 05:57:16 PM 348 Views
faulty assumptions - 10/03/2010 05:05:23 AM 354 Views
Impossible. - 10/03/2010 06:22:43 AM 349 Views
maybe an analogy will help - 10/03/2010 12:55:37 PM 763 Views
But therein lies the problem. - 10/03/2010 04:58:42 PM 353 Views
your own argument is self defeating - 11/03/2010 08:10:36 AM 376 Views
Anyway I just realized this point is irrelevant to the original theory - 11/03/2010 08:14:20 AM 354 Views
Yes, I said that at the very beginning: *NM* - 11/03/2010 05:44:19 PM 173 Views
Your reasons and mine for irrelevancy are different.. *NM* - 12/03/2010 05:12:52 AM 162 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 10:43:16 PM 433 Views
I don't know if this has any basis in fact... - 04/03/2010 02:44:26 AM 498 Views

Reply to Message