Active Users:343 Time:17/06/2025 12:36:38 PM
Impressive newyorkersedai Send a noteboard - 02/03/2010 07:24:09 PM
Most impressive.
This is definitely one to give a leisurely read-through and contemplate.
I'd still say that there's an unequivocal wrongness to grabbing men, women, and children, then feeding them to other creatures.

Yet, there are many real world examples of people who steep themselves in High Reason, overlooking various aspects of common sense - or becoming apathetic to violations of natural law (murder, rape, etc).

When Rand spoke with Moridin in TGS, I loved what he said: that, in essence, Ishy was driven mad by reason.
Reply to message
Ishamael's nature - 01/03/2010 05:27:48 PM 1786 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 01/03/2010 07:15:54 PM 807 Views
Sisyphus *NM* - 02/03/2010 02:27:06 AM 274 Views
Not a question of intelligence. Rather, a different way of thinking... - 01/03/2010 07:23:37 PM 824 Views
I agree, except with your statement on what Ishamael's area of expertise is ... - 02/03/2010 03:17:13 PM 653 Views
Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil - 02/03/2010 04:38:06 PM 677 Views
Are you saying that philosophers are inherently more intelligent than other academics? - 02/03/2010 04:53:13 PM 574 Views
Maybe - 02/03/2010 06:00:20 PM 643 Views
Crap - 02/03/2010 08:58:12 PM 634 Views
I think the averages are averages. - 03/03/2010 01:14:41 AM 561 Views
Re: Crap - 05/03/2010 08:46:56 PM 532 Views
Re: Crap - 07/03/2010 11:36:16 PM 501 Views
I love IQ tests. - 08/03/2010 01:18:10 AM 499 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil - 02/03/2010 05:30:43 PM 599 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil - 07/03/2010 11:31:14 PM 540 Views
I'm not an expert on nihilism, but ... - 08/03/2010 05:22:33 PM 690 Views
I doubt that. - 08/03/2010 01:21:32 AM 512 Views
Re: I doubt that. - 08/03/2010 12:41:43 PM 500 Views
Yep, I agree. - 08/03/2010 05:58:03 PM 596 Views
This ties in with his parallel to Lucifer. - 03/03/2010 12:57:37 AM 580 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 01:49:19 AM 628 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 02:51:44 PM 577 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 07:31:32 PM 553 Views
Both of us are saying the same thing - 03/03/2010 01:46:57 PM 520 Views
sorry, took "evil" too literally and - 03/03/2010 07:02:01 PM 498 Views
Found a great theory about Ishamael and his logic on theoryland - 02/03/2010 02:48:02 PM 950 Views
Nice - 02/03/2010 04:41:05 PM 565 Views
Impressive - 02/03/2010 07:24:09 PM 561 Views
I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least... - 08/03/2010 01:47:47 AM 560 Views
Re: I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least... - 08/03/2010 12:37:27 PM 506 Views
Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern. - 08/03/2010 06:23:19 PM 530 Views
Re: Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern. - 09/03/2010 01:54:26 PM 519 Views
Because there is a Creator. - 09/03/2010 05:57:16 PM 483 Views
faulty assumptions - 10/03/2010 05:05:23 AM 491 Views
Impossible. - 10/03/2010 06:22:43 AM 482 Views
maybe an analogy will help - 10/03/2010 12:55:37 PM 900 Views
But therein lies the problem. - 10/03/2010 04:58:42 PM 480 Views
your own argument is self defeating - 11/03/2010 08:10:36 AM 509 Views
Anyway I just realized this point is irrelevant to the original theory - 11/03/2010 08:14:20 AM 490 Views
Yes, I said that at the very beginning: *NM* - 11/03/2010 05:44:19 PM 225 Views
Your reasons and mine for irrelevancy are different.. *NM* - 12/03/2010 05:12:52 AM 216 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 10:43:16 PM 572 Views
I don't know if this has any basis in fact... - 04/03/2010 02:44:26 AM 644 Views

Reply to Message