Active Users:1292 Time:01/08/2026 02:28:46 PM
Impressive newyorkersedai Send a noteboard - 02/03/2010 07:24:09 PM
Most impressive.
This is definitely one to give a leisurely read-through and contemplate.
I'd still say that there's an unequivocal wrongness to grabbing men, women, and children, then feeding them to other creatures.

Yet, there are many real world examples of people who steep themselves in High Reason, overlooking various aspects of common sense - or becoming apathetic to violations of natural law (murder, rape, etc).

When Rand spoke with Moridin in TGS, I loved what he said: that, in essence, Ishy was driven mad by reason.
Reply to message
Ishamael's nature - 01/03/2010 05:27:48 PM 1969 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 01/03/2010 07:15:54 PM 991 Views
Sisyphus *NM* - 02/03/2010 02:27:06 AM 360 Views
Not a question of intelligence. Rather, a different way of thinking... - 01/03/2010 07:23:37 PM 1008 Views
I agree, except with your statement on what Ishamael's area of expertise is ... - 02/03/2010 03:17:13 PM 819 Views
Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil - 02/03/2010 04:38:06 PM 857 Views
Are you saying that philosophers are inherently more intelligent than other academics? - 02/03/2010 04:53:13 PM 739 Views
Maybe - 02/03/2010 06:00:20 PM 827 Views
Crap - 02/03/2010 08:58:12 PM 782 Views
I think the averages are averages. - 03/03/2010 01:14:41 AM 727 Views
Re: Crap - 05/03/2010 08:46:56 PM 732 Views
Re: Crap - 07/03/2010 11:36:16 PM 685 Views
I love IQ tests. - 08/03/2010 01:18:10 AM 660 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil - 02/03/2010 05:30:43 PM 794 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil - 07/03/2010 11:31:14 PM 720 Views
I'm not an expert on nihilism, but ... - 08/03/2010 05:22:33 PM 856 Views
I doubt that. - 08/03/2010 01:21:32 AM 683 Views
Re: I doubt that. - 08/03/2010 12:41:43 PM 663 Views
Yep, I agree. - 08/03/2010 05:58:03 PM 770 Views
This ties in with his parallel to Lucifer. - 03/03/2010 12:57:37 AM 769 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 01:49:19 AM 805 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 02:51:44 PM 763 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 07:31:32 PM 720 Views
Both of us are saying the same thing - 03/03/2010 01:46:57 PM 705 Views
sorry, took "evil" too literally and - 03/03/2010 07:02:01 PM 671 Views
Found a great theory about Ishamael and his logic on theoryland - 02/03/2010 02:48:02 PM 1222 Views
Nice - 02/03/2010 04:41:05 PM 737 Views
Impressive - 02/03/2010 07:24:09 PM 720 Views
I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least... - 08/03/2010 01:47:47 AM 733 Views
Re: I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least... - 08/03/2010 12:37:27 PM 677 Views
Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern. - 08/03/2010 06:23:19 PM 746 Views
Re: Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern. - 09/03/2010 01:54:26 PM 722 Views
Because there is a Creator. - 09/03/2010 05:57:16 PM 657 Views
faulty assumptions - 10/03/2010 05:05:23 AM 661 Views
Impossible. - 10/03/2010 06:22:43 AM 671 Views
maybe an analogy will help - 10/03/2010 12:55:37 PM 1069 Views
But therein lies the problem. - 10/03/2010 04:58:42 PM 643 Views
your own argument is self defeating - 11/03/2010 08:10:36 AM 688 Views
Anyway I just realized this point is irrelevant to the original theory - 11/03/2010 08:14:20 AM 666 Views
Yes, I said that at the very beginning: *NM* - 11/03/2010 05:44:19 PM 312 Views
Your reasons and mine for irrelevancy are different.. *NM* - 12/03/2010 05:12:52 AM 299 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 10:43:16 PM 761 Views
I don't know if this has any basis in fact... - 04/03/2010 02:44:26 AM 890 Views

Reply to Message