I always took it to mean that like many philosophers, it is easier for Ishamael to be distracted by faulty logic because just because something makes sense on paper or when you think about it, doesn't mean it follows in the real world.
For example, you could go through many complex convolutions of thought and philosophy to conclude that 1 + 1 does not equal two, depending upon your manipulation of the numbers and the statements, so that the conclusion, while technically correct, may be wrong in the real world.
I think Ishamael/Moridin has always proven to be high with book or scholarly intelligence but exceptionally low with his understanding of people, which poisons how he thinks of the Pattern.
Basically, I think he's a very intelligent idiot who only made it as far as he did because of his strength in the One Power.
For example, you could go through many complex convolutions of thought and philosophy to conclude that 1 + 1 does not equal two, depending upon your manipulation of the numbers and the statements, so that the conclusion, while technically correct, may be wrong in the real world.
I think Ishamael/Moridin has always proven to be high with book or scholarly intelligence but exceptionally low with his understanding of people, which poisons how he thinks of the Pattern.
Basically, I think he's a very intelligent idiot who only made it as far as he did because of his strength in the One Power.
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
This message last edited by RugbyPlayingAshaman on 04/03/2010 at 04:47:34 PM
Ishamael's nature
- 01/03/2010 05:27:48 PM
1970 Views
Not a question of intelligence. Rather, a different way of thinking...
- 01/03/2010 07:23:37 PM
1010 Views
I'd go with this - he lost sight of the forest for enumerating the trees.
- 01/03/2010 08:21:39 PM
1075 Views
I agree, except with your statement on what Ishamael's area of expertise is ...
- 02/03/2010 03:17:13 PM
820 Views
Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil
- 02/03/2010 04:38:06 PM
858 Views
Are you saying that philosophers are inherently more intelligent than other academics?
- 02/03/2010 04:53:13 PM
741 Views
Crap
- 02/03/2010 08:58:12 PM
782 Views
That high IQ should make you realise that I am making the same point you are...
- 02/03/2010 09:53:59 PM
768 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil
- 02/03/2010 05:30:43 PM
795 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil
- 02/03/2010 06:01:41 PM
792 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil
- 07/03/2010 11:31:14 PM
721 Views
I doubt that.
- 08/03/2010 01:21:32 AM
684 Views
Re: Not a question of intelligence. Rather, a different way of thinking...
- 02/03/2010 07:22:58 PM
744 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature
- 02/03/2010 01:49:19 AM
806 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature
- 02/03/2010 02:51:44 PM
763 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature
- 02/03/2010 07:31:32 PM
722 Views
Found a great theory about Ishamael and his logic on theoryland
- 02/03/2010 02:48:02 PM
1223 Views
I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least...
- 08/03/2010 01:47:47 AM
733 Views
Re: I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least...
- 08/03/2010 12:37:27 PM
678 Views
Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern.
- 08/03/2010 06:23:19 PM
747 Views
Re: Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern.
- 09/03/2010 01:54:26 PM
723 Views
Because there is a Creator.
- 09/03/2010 05:57:16 PM
659 Views
faulty assumptions
- 10/03/2010 05:05:23 AM
662 Views
Impossible.
- 10/03/2010 06:22:43 AM
672 Views
maybe an analogy will help
- 10/03/2010 12:55:37 PM
1070 Views
- 10/03/2010 12:55:37 PM
1070 Views
But therein lies the problem.
- 10/03/2010 04:58:42 PM
644 Views
your own argument is self defeating
- 11/03/2010 08:10:36 AM
689 Views
No, that past was created after he was imprisoned.
- 11/03/2010 05:43:08 PM
704 Views
*sigh* I guess we will just have to agree to disagree then.... I still think your theory is flawed *NM*
- 12/03/2010 05:11:10 AM
320 Views
Anyway I just realized this point is irrelevant to the original theory
- 11/03/2010 08:14:20 AM
667 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature
- 02/03/2010 10:43:16 PM
762 Views
