Active Users:1640 Time:02/05/2026 08:03:56 AM
Re: Ishamael's nature RugbyPlayingAshaman Send a noteboard - 02/03/2010 10:43:16 PM
I always took it to mean that like many philosophers, it is easier for Ishamael to be distracted by faulty logic because just because something makes sense on paper or when you think about it, doesn't mean it follows in the real world.

For example, you could go through many complex convolutions of thought and philosophy to conclude that 1 + 1 does not equal two, depending upon your manipulation of the numbers and the statements, so that the conclusion, while technically correct, may be wrong in the real world.

I think Ishamael/Moridin has always proven to be high with book or scholarly intelligence but exceptionally low with his understanding of people, which poisons how he thinks of the Pattern.

Basically, I think he's a very intelligent idiot who only made it as far as he did because of his strength in the One Power.
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
This message last edited by RugbyPlayingAshaman on 04/03/2010 at 04:47:34 PM
Reply to message
Ishamael's nature - 01/03/2010 05:27:48 PM 1909 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 01/03/2010 07:15:54 PM 924 Views
Sisyphus *NM* - 02/03/2010 02:27:06 AM 328 Views
Not a question of intelligence. Rather, a different way of thinking... - 01/03/2010 07:23:37 PM 952 Views
I agree, except with your statement on what Ishamael's area of expertise is ... - 02/03/2010 03:17:13 PM 764 Views
Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil - 02/03/2010 04:38:06 PM 802 Views
Are you saying that philosophers are inherently more intelligent than other academics? - 02/03/2010 04:53:13 PM 693 Views
Maybe - 02/03/2010 06:00:20 PM 769 Views
Crap - 02/03/2010 08:58:12 PM 736 Views
I think the averages are averages. - 03/03/2010 01:14:41 AM 669 Views
Re: Crap - 05/03/2010 08:46:56 PM 658 Views
Re: Crap - 07/03/2010 11:36:16 PM 641 Views
I love IQ tests. - 08/03/2010 01:18:10 AM 614 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil - 02/03/2010 05:30:43 PM 739 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil - 07/03/2010 11:31:14 PM 656 Views
I'm not an expert on nihilism, but ... - 08/03/2010 05:22:33 PM 805 Views
I doubt that. - 08/03/2010 01:21:32 AM 634 Views
Re: I doubt that. - 08/03/2010 12:41:43 PM 613 Views
Yep, I agree. - 08/03/2010 05:58:03 PM 717 Views
This ties in with his parallel to Lucifer. - 03/03/2010 12:57:37 AM 714 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 01:49:19 AM 742 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 02:51:44 PM 711 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 07:31:32 PM 662 Views
Both of us are saying the same thing - 03/03/2010 01:46:57 PM 650 Views
sorry, took "evil" too literally and - 03/03/2010 07:02:01 PM 611 Views
Found a great theory about Ishamael and his logic on theoryland - 02/03/2010 02:48:02 PM 1169 Views
Nice - 02/03/2010 04:41:05 PM 679 Views
Impressive - 02/03/2010 07:24:09 PM 675 Views
I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least... - 08/03/2010 01:47:47 AM 671 Views
Re: I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least... - 08/03/2010 12:37:27 PM 625 Views
Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern. - 08/03/2010 06:23:19 PM 680 Views
Re: Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern. - 09/03/2010 01:54:26 PM 679 Views
Because there is a Creator. - 09/03/2010 05:57:16 PM 606 Views
faulty assumptions - 10/03/2010 05:05:23 AM 614 Views
Impossible. - 10/03/2010 06:22:43 AM 620 Views
maybe an analogy will help - 10/03/2010 12:55:37 PM 1025 Views
But therein lies the problem. - 10/03/2010 04:58:42 PM 589 Views
your own argument is self defeating - 11/03/2010 08:10:36 AM 632 Views
Anyway I just realized this point is irrelevant to the original theory - 11/03/2010 08:14:20 AM 596 Views
Yes, I said that at the very beginning: *NM* - 11/03/2010 05:44:19 PM 284 Views
Your reasons and mine for irrelevancy are different.. *NM* - 12/03/2010 05:12:52 AM 271 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 10:43:16 PM 699 Views
I don't know if this has any basis in fact... - 04/03/2010 02:44:26 AM 832 Views

Reply to Message