I always took it to mean that like many philosophers, it is easier for Ishamael to be distracted by faulty logic because just because something makes sense on paper or when you think about it, doesn't mean it follows in the real world.
For example, you could go through many complex convolutions of thought and philosophy to conclude that 1 + 1 does not equal two, depending upon your manipulation of the numbers and the statements, so that the conclusion, while technically correct, may be wrong in the real world.
I think Ishamael/Moridin has always proven to be high with book or scholarly intelligence but exceptionally low with his understanding of people, which poisons how he thinks of the Pattern.
Basically, I think he's a very intelligent idiot who only made it as far as he did because of his strength in the One Power.
For example, you could go through many complex convolutions of thought and philosophy to conclude that 1 + 1 does not equal two, depending upon your manipulation of the numbers and the statements, so that the conclusion, while technically correct, may be wrong in the real world.
I think Ishamael/Moridin has always proven to be high with book or scholarly intelligence but exceptionally low with his understanding of people, which poisons how he thinks of the Pattern.
Basically, I think he's a very intelligent idiot who only made it as far as he did because of his strength in the One Power.
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
This message last edited by RugbyPlayingAshaman on 04/03/2010 at 04:47:34 PM
Ishamael's nature
- 01/03/2010 05:27:48 PM
1877 Views
Not a question of intelligence. Rather, a different way of thinking...
- 01/03/2010 07:23:37 PM
920 Views
I'd go with this - he lost sight of the forest for enumerating the trees.
- 01/03/2010 08:21:39 PM
998 Views
I agree, except with your statement on what Ishamael's area of expertise is ...
- 02/03/2010 03:17:13 PM
731 Views
Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil
- 02/03/2010 04:38:06 PM
769 Views
Are you saying that philosophers are inherently more intelligent than other academics?
- 02/03/2010 04:53:13 PM
661 Views
Crap
- 02/03/2010 08:58:12 PM
705 Views
That high IQ should make you realise that I am making the same point you are...
- 02/03/2010 09:53:59 PM
679 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil
- 02/03/2010 05:30:43 PM
700 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil
- 02/03/2010 06:01:41 PM
685 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil
- 07/03/2010 11:31:14 PM
626 Views
I doubt that.
- 08/03/2010 01:21:32 AM
597 Views
Re: Not a question of intelligence. Rather, a different way of thinking...
- 02/03/2010 07:22:58 PM
640 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature
- 02/03/2010 01:49:19 AM
708 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature
- 02/03/2010 02:51:44 PM
676 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature
- 02/03/2010 07:31:32 PM
632 Views
Found a great theory about Ishamael and his logic on theoryland
- 02/03/2010 02:48:02 PM
1095 Views
I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least...
- 08/03/2010 01:47:47 AM
642 Views
Re: I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least...
- 08/03/2010 12:37:27 PM
596 Views
Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern.
- 08/03/2010 06:23:19 PM
636 Views
Re: Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern.
- 09/03/2010 01:54:26 PM
630 Views
Because there is a Creator.
- 09/03/2010 05:57:16 PM
574 Views
faulty assumptions
- 10/03/2010 05:05:23 AM
579 Views
Impossible.
- 10/03/2010 06:22:43 AM
586 Views
maybe an analogy will help
- 10/03/2010 12:55:37 PM
986 Views
- 10/03/2010 12:55:37 PM
986 Views
But therein lies the problem.
- 10/03/2010 04:58:42 PM
559 Views
your own argument is self defeating
- 11/03/2010 08:10:36 AM
594 Views
No, that past was created after he was imprisoned.
- 11/03/2010 05:43:08 PM
605 Views
*sigh* I guess we will just have to agree to disagree then.... I still think your theory is flawed *NM*
- 12/03/2010 05:11:10 AM
265 Views
Anyway I just realized this point is irrelevant to the original theory
- 11/03/2010 08:14:20 AM
563 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature
- 02/03/2010 10:43:16 PM
657 Views
