I always took it to mean that like many philosophers, it is easier for Ishamael to be distracted by faulty logic because just because something makes sense on paper or when you think about it, doesn't mean it follows in the real world.
For example, you could go through many complex convolutions of thought and philosophy to conclude that 1 + 1 does not equal two, depending upon your manipulation of the numbers and the statements, so that the conclusion, while technically correct, may be wrong in the real world.
I think Ishamael/Moridin has always proven to be high with book or scholarly intelligence but exceptionally low with his understanding of people, which poisons how he thinks of the Pattern.
Basically, I think he's a very intelligent idiot who only made it as far as he did because of his strength in the One Power.
For example, you could go through many complex convolutions of thought and philosophy to conclude that 1 + 1 does not equal two, depending upon your manipulation of the numbers and the statements, so that the conclusion, while technically correct, may be wrong in the real world.
I think Ishamael/Moridin has always proven to be high with book or scholarly intelligence but exceptionally low with his understanding of people, which poisons how he thinks of the Pattern.
Basically, I think he's a very intelligent idiot who only made it as far as he did because of his strength in the One Power.
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
This message last edited by RugbyPlayingAshaman on 04/03/2010 at 04:47:34 PM
Ishamael's nature
- 01/03/2010 05:27:48 PM
2033 Views
Not a question of intelligence. Rather, a different way of thinking...
- 01/03/2010 07:23:37 PM
1065 Views
I'd go with this - he lost sight of the forest for enumerating the trees.
- 01/03/2010 08:21:39 PM
1132 Views
I agree, except with your statement on what Ishamael's area of expertise is ...
- 02/03/2010 03:17:13 PM
877 Views
Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil
- 02/03/2010 04:38:06 PM
916 Views
Are you saying that philosophers are inherently more intelligent than other academics?
- 02/03/2010 04:53:13 PM
790 Views
Crap
- 02/03/2010 08:58:12 PM
839 Views
That high IQ should make you realise that I am making the same point you are...
- 02/03/2010 09:53:59 PM
821 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil
- 02/03/2010 05:30:43 PM
848 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil
- 02/03/2010 06:01:41 PM
855 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil
- 07/03/2010 11:31:14 PM
789 Views
I doubt that.
- 08/03/2010 01:21:32 AM
735 Views
Re: Not a question of intelligence. Rather, a different way of thinking...
- 02/03/2010 07:22:58 PM
792 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature
- 02/03/2010 01:49:19 AM
869 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature
- 02/03/2010 02:51:44 PM
816 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature
- 02/03/2010 07:31:32 PM
772 Views
Found a great theory about Ishamael and his logic on theoryland
- 02/03/2010 02:48:02 PM
1281 Views
I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least...
- 08/03/2010 01:47:47 AM
792 Views
Re: I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least...
- 08/03/2010 12:37:27 PM
731 Views
Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern.
- 08/03/2010 06:23:19 PM
815 Views
Re: Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern.
- 09/03/2010 01:54:26 PM
776 Views
Because there is a Creator.
- 09/03/2010 05:57:16 PM
707 Views
faulty assumptions
- 10/03/2010 05:05:23 AM
718 Views
Impossible.
- 10/03/2010 06:22:43 AM
724 Views
maybe an analogy will help
- 10/03/2010 12:55:37 PM
1129 Views
- 10/03/2010 12:55:37 PM
1129 Views
But therein lies the problem.
- 10/03/2010 04:58:42 PM
693 Views
your own argument is self defeating
- 11/03/2010 08:10:36 AM
745 Views
No, that past was created after he was imprisoned.
- 11/03/2010 05:43:08 PM
765 Views
*sigh* I guess we will just have to agree to disagree then.... I still think your theory is flawed *NM*
- 12/03/2010 05:11:10 AM
350 Views
Anyway I just realized this point is irrelevant to the original theory
- 11/03/2010 08:14:20 AM
728 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature
- 02/03/2010 10:43:16 PM
815 Views
