Ishamael is the ultimate villain and minion for the Dark One. He believes in pure evil, knows what it means to break the Wheel, and still supports it. This makes him unique among the Forsaken - the rest still think that they'll rule in hell.
In part, I therefore disagree with Shannow. I think Ishamael, like every great philosopher in our history, is a step higher in mental functioning. He is more intelligent than the other Forsaken, and probably every character we know. The fact that he chose the wrong side is curious, except for the fact that he thinks it is the right side. That's possibly why his peers think he's mad.
In part, I therefore disagree with Shannow. I think Ishamael, like every great philosopher in our history, is a step higher in mental functioning. He is more intelligent than the other Forsaken, and probably every character we know. The fact that he chose the wrong side is curious, except for the fact that he thinks it is the right side. That's possibly why his peers think he's mad.
Ishamael has many similarities to the fallen angel Lucifer. In this case how absolute knowledge brings Pride and a Nihilistic PoV to life. As the Bible puts it: "Behold, thou art wiser than Daniel; there is no secret that they can hide from thee", and later, "Thine heart was lifted up because of thy beauty, thou hast corrupted thy wisdom by reason of thy brightness: I will cast thee to the ground, I will lay thee before kings, that they may behold thee." This tells of how he had ultimate wisdom and through his great reasoning fell.
Ishamael's nature
01/03/2010 05:27:48 PM
- 1770 Views
Not a question of intelligence. Rather, a different way of thinking...
01/03/2010 07:23:37 PM
- 808 Views
I'd go with this - he lost sight of the forest for enumerating the trees.
01/03/2010 08:21:39 PM
- 872 Views
I agree, except with your statement on what Ishamael's area of expertise is ...
02/03/2010 03:17:13 PM
- 638 Views
Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil
02/03/2010 04:38:06 PM
- 660 Views
Are you saying that philosophers are inherently more intelligent than other academics?
02/03/2010 04:53:13 PM
- 558 Views
Crap
02/03/2010 08:58:12 PM
- 615 Views
That high IQ should make you realise that I am making the same point you are...
02/03/2010 09:53:59 PM
- 573 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil
02/03/2010 05:30:43 PM
- 575 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil
02/03/2010 06:01:41 PM
- 580 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil
07/03/2010 11:31:14 PM
- 522 Views
I doubt that.
08/03/2010 01:21:32 AM
- 495 Views
This ties in with his parallel to Lucifer.
03/03/2010 12:57:37 AM
- 564 Views
Re: Not a question of intelligence. Rather, a different way of thinking...
02/03/2010 07:22:58 PM
- 542 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature
02/03/2010 01:49:19 AM
- 614 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature
02/03/2010 02:51:44 PM
- 554 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature
02/03/2010 07:31:32 PM
- 537 Views
Found a great theory about Ishamael and his logic on theoryland
02/03/2010 02:48:02 PM
- 885 Views
I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least...
08/03/2010 01:47:47 AM
- 545 Views
Re: I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least...
08/03/2010 12:37:27 PM
- 490 Views
Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern.
08/03/2010 06:23:19 PM
- 486 Views
Re: Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern.
09/03/2010 01:54:26 PM
- 471 Views
Because there is a Creator.
09/03/2010 05:57:16 PM
- 466 Views
faulty assumptions
10/03/2010 05:05:23 AM
- 470 Views
Impossible.
10/03/2010 06:22:43 AM
- 467 Views
maybe an analogy will help
10/03/2010 12:55:37 PM
- 884 Views

But therein lies the problem.
10/03/2010 04:58:42 PM
- 465 Views
your own argument is self defeating
11/03/2010 08:10:36 AM
- 495 Views
No, that past was created after he was imprisoned.
11/03/2010 05:43:08 PM
- 494 Views
*sigh* I guess we will just have to agree to disagree then.... I still think your theory is flawed *NM*
12/03/2010 05:11:10 AM
- 225 Views
Anyway I just realized this point is irrelevant to the original theory
11/03/2010 08:14:20 AM
- 472 Views