Active Users:357 Time:17/06/2025 01:34:47 PM
This ties in with his parallel to Lucifer. Kieran Send a noteboard - 03/03/2010 12:57:37 AM
Ishamael is the ultimate villain and minion for the Dark One. He believes in pure evil, knows what it means to break the Wheel, and still supports it. This makes him unique among the Forsaken - the rest still think that they'll rule in hell.

In part, I therefore disagree with Shannow. I think Ishamael, like every great philosopher in our history, is a step higher in mental functioning. He is more intelligent than the other Forsaken, and probably every character we know. The fact that he chose the wrong side is curious, except for the fact that he thinks it is the right side. That's possibly why his peers think he's mad.


Ishamael has many similarities to the fallen angel Lucifer. In this case how absolute knowledge brings Pride and a Nihilistic PoV to life. As the Bible puts it: "Behold, thou art wiser than Daniel; there is no secret that they can hide from thee", and later, "Thine heart was lifted up because of thy beauty, thou hast corrupted thy wisdom by reason of thy brightness: I will cast thee to the ground, I will lay thee before kings, that they may behold thee." This tells of how he had ultimate wisdom and through his great reasoning fell.
Reply to message
Ishamael's nature - 01/03/2010 05:27:48 PM 1786 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 01/03/2010 07:15:54 PM 808 Views
Sisyphus *NM* - 02/03/2010 02:27:06 AM 274 Views
Not a question of intelligence. Rather, a different way of thinking... - 01/03/2010 07:23:37 PM 825 Views
I agree, except with your statement on what Ishamael's area of expertise is ... - 02/03/2010 03:17:13 PM 653 Views
Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil - 02/03/2010 04:38:06 PM 678 Views
Are you saying that philosophers are inherently more intelligent than other academics? - 02/03/2010 04:53:13 PM 575 Views
Maybe - 02/03/2010 06:00:20 PM 643 Views
Crap - 02/03/2010 08:58:12 PM 635 Views
I think the averages are averages. - 03/03/2010 01:14:41 AM 561 Views
Re: Crap - 05/03/2010 08:46:56 PM 533 Views
Re: Crap - 07/03/2010 11:36:16 PM 503 Views
I love IQ tests. - 08/03/2010 01:18:10 AM 499 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil - 02/03/2010 05:30:43 PM 599 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil - 07/03/2010 11:31:14 PM 540 Views
I'm not an expert on nihilism, but ... - 08/03/2010 05:22:33 PM 691 Views
I doubt that. - 08/03/2010 01:21:32 AM 512 Views
Re: I doubt that. - 08/03/2010 12:41:43 PM 500 Views
Yep, I agree. - 08/03/2010 05:58:03 PM 596 Views
This ties in with his parallel to Lucifer. - 03/03/2010 12:57:37 AM 582 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 01:49:19 AM 630 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 02:51:44 PM 577 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 07:31:32 PM 554 Views
Both of us are saying the same thing - 03/03/2010 01:46:57 PM 520 Views
sorry, took "evil" too literally and - 03/03/2010 07:02:01 PM 498 Views
Found a great theory about Ishamael and his logic on theoryland - 02/03/2010 02:48:02 PM 950 Views
Nice - 02/03/2010 04:41:05 PM 565 Views
Impressive - 02/03/2010 07:24:09 PM 562 Views
I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least... - 08/03/2010 01:47:47 AM 560 Views
Re: I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least... - 08/03/2010 12:37:27 PM 507 Views
Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern. - 08/03/2010 06:23:19 PM 531 Views
Re: Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern. - 09/03/2010 01:54:26 PM 520 Views
Because there is a Creator. - 09/03/2010 05:57:16 PM 484 Views
faulty assumptions - 10/03/2010 05:05:23 AM 491 Views
Impossible. - 10/03/2010 06:22:43 AM 483 Views
maybe an analogy will help - 10/03/2010 12:55:37 PM 901 Views
But therein lies the problem. - 10/03/2010 04:58:42 PM 482 Views
your own argument is self defeating - 11/03/2010 08:10:36 AM 511 Views
Anyway I just realized this point is irrelevant to the original theory - 11/03/2010 08:14:20 AM 491 Views
Yes, I said that at the very beginning: *NM* - 11/03/2010 05:44:19 PM 225 Views
Your reasons and mine for irrelevancy are different.. *NM* - 12/03/2010 05:12:52 AM 216 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 10:43:16 PM 573 Views
I don't know if this has any basis in fact... - 04/03/2010 02:44:26 AM 644 Views

Reply to Message