Active Users:412 Time:01/05/2025 11:02:02 PM
Both of us are saying the same thing car'a'aman Send a noteboard - 03/03/2010 01:46:57 PM
What I meant by "could not completely rid the world of evil" was that even if 'dark' Rand beat the Dark One, the world would still not be free of evil. Why would the Seanchan victory be bad? Because they are evil (or at least oppressive). Similarly Rand would cause so much turmoil and sacrifice so much, break the world to a million peices, all for the one goal of fighting the Dark One, that winning would be as bad as losing

Thank goodness he went to Dragonmount and had a major flashback...
Write drunk, revise sober.*MySmiley*
Reply to message
Ishamael's nature - 01/03/2010 05:27:48 PM 1771 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 01/03/2010 07:15:54 PM 794 Views
Sisyphus *NM* - 02/03/2010 02:27:06 AM 265 Views
Not a question of intelligence. Rather, a different way of thinking... - 01/03/2010 07:23:37 PM 809 Views
I agree, except with your statement on what Ishamael's area of expertise is ... - 02/03/2010 03:17:13 PM 638 Views
Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil - 02/03/2010 04:38:06 PM 660 Views
Are you saying that philosophers are inherently more intelligent than other academics? - 02/03/2010 04:53:13 PM 559 Views
Maybe - 02/03/2010 06:00:20 PM 624 Views
Crap - 02/03/2010 08:58:12 PM 615 Views
I think the averages are averages. - 03/03/2010 01:14:41 AM 540 Views
Re: Crap - 05/03/2010 08:46:56 PM 514 Views
Re: Crap - 07/03/2010 11:36:16 PM 484 Views
I love IQ tests. - 08/03/2010 01:18:10 AM 484 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil - 02/03/2010 05:30:43 PM 577 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil - 07/03/2010 11:31:14 PM 524 Views
I'm not an expert on nihilism, but ... - 08/03/2010 05:22:33 PM 676 Views
I doubt that. - 08/03/2010 01:21:32 AM 496 Views
Re: I doubt that. - 08/03/2010 12:41:43 PM 485 Views
Yep, I agree. - 08/03/2010 05:58:03 PM 576 Views
This ties in with his parallel to Lucifer. - 03/03/2010 12:57:37 AM 565 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 01:49:19 AM 615 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 02:51:44 PM 555 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 07:31:32 PM 538 Views
Both of us are saying the same thing - 03/03/2010 01:46:57 PM 502 Views
sorry, took "evil" too literally and - 03/03/2010 07:02:01 PM 482 Views
Found a great theory about Ishamael and his logic on theoryland - 02/03/2010 02:48:02 PM 886 Views
Nice - 02/03/2010 04:41:05 PM 550 Views
Impressive - 02/03/2010 07:24:09 PM 546 Views
I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least... - 08/03/2010 01:47:47 AM 545 Views
Re: I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least... - 08/03/2010 12:37:27 PM 491 Views
Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern. - 08/03/2010 06:23:19 PM 486 Views
Re: Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern. - 09/03/2010 01:54:26 PM 471 Views
Because there is a Creator. - 09/03/2010 05:57:16 PM 466 Views
faulty assumptions - 10/03/2010 05:05:23 AM 471 Views
Impossible. - 10/03/2010 06:22:43 AM 469 Views
maybe an analogy will help - 10/03/2010 12:55:37 PM 884 Views
But therein lies the problem. - 10/03/2010 04:58:42 PM 467 Views
your own argument is self defeating - 11/03/2010 08:10:36 AM 495 Views
Anyway I just realized this point is irrelevant to the original theory - 11/03/2010 08:14:20 AM 473 Views
Yes, I said that at the very beginning: *NM* - 11/03/2010 05:44:19 PM 218 Views
Your reasons and mine for irrelevancy are different.. *NM* - 12/03/2010 05:12:52 AM 208 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 10:43:16 PM 554 Views
I don't know if this has any basis in fact... - 04/03/2010 02:44:26 AM 618 Views

Reply to Message