What I meant by "could not completely rid the world of evil" was that even if 'dark' Rand beat the Dark One, the world would still not be free of evil. Why would the Seanchan victory be bad? Because they are evil (or at least oppressive). Similarly Rand would cause so much turmoil and sacrifice so much, break the world to a million peices, all for the one goal of fighting the Dark One, that winning would be as bad as losing
Thank goodness he went to Dragonmount and had a major flashback...
Thank goodness he went to Dragonmount and had a major flashback...
Write drunk, revise sober.*MySmiley*
Ishamael's nature
01/03/2010 05:27:48 PM
- 1786 Views
Not a question of intelligence. Rather, a different way of thinking...
01/03/2010 07:23:37 PM
- 823 Views
I'd go with this - he lost sight of the forest for enumerating the trees.
01/03/2010 08:21:39 PM
- 893 Views
I agree, except with your statement on what Ishamael's area of expertise is ...
02/03/2010 03:17:13 PM
- 653 Views
Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil
02/03/2010 04:38:06 PM
- 676 Views
Are you saying that philosophers are inherently more intelligent than other academics?
02/03/2010 04:53:13 PM
- 573 Views
Crap
02/03/2010 08:58:12 PM
- 633 Views
That high IQ should make you realise that I am making the same point you are...
02/03/2010 09:53:59 PM
- 589 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil
02/03/2010 05:30:43 PM
- 599 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil
02/03/2010 06:01:41 PM
- 594 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil
07/03/2010 11:31:14 PM
- 539 Views
I doubt that.
08/03/2010 01:21:32 AM
- 512 Views
Re: Not a question of intelligence. Rather, a different way of thinking...
02/03/2010 07:22:58 PM
- 561 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature
02/03/2010 01:49:19 AM
- 628 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature
02/03/2010 02:51:44 PM
- 577 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature
02/03/2010 07:31:32 PM
- 552 Views
Both of us are saying the same thing
03/03/2010 01:46:57 PM
- 520 Views
Found a great theory about Ishamael and his logic on theoryland
02/03/2010 02:48:02 PM
- 950 Views
I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least...
08/03/2010 01:47:47 AM
- 560 Views
Re: I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least...
08/03/2010 12:37:27 PM
- 505 Views
Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern.
08/03/2010 06:23:19 PM
- 530 Views
Re: Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern.
09/03/2010 01:54:26 PM
- 519 Views
Because there is a Creator.
09/03/2010 05:57:16 PM
- 483 Views
faulty assumptions
10/03/2010 05:05:23 AM
- 491 Views
Impossible.
10/03/2010 06:22:43 AM
- 482 Views
maybe an analogy will help
10/03/2010 12:55:37 PM
- 900 Views

But therein lies the problem.
10/03/2010 04:58:42 PM
- 480 Views
your own argument is self defeating
11/03/2010 08:10:36 AM
- 509 Views
No, that past was created after he was imprisoned.
11/03/2010 05:43:08 PM
- 515 Views
*sigh* I guess we will just have to agree to disagree then.... I still think your theory is flawed *NM*
12/03/2010 05:11:10 AM
- 232 Views
Anyway I just realized this point is irrelevant to the original theory
11/03/2010 08:14:20 AM
- 489 Views